public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com,
	John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, ltp@lists.linux.it,
	Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>,
	Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com>,
	David Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] [block/bdev]  3c20917120: BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_mm/util.c
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 12:16:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9sYGccL4TocoITf@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z9r27eUk993BNWTX@bombadil.infradead.org>

On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 09:55:11AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> FWIW, I'm not seeing this crash or any kernel splat within the
> same time (I'll let this run the full 2.5 hours now to verify) on
> vanilla 6.14.0-rc3 + the 64k-sector-size patches, which would explain why I
> hadn't seen this in my earlier testing over 10 ext4 profiles on fstests. This
> particular crash seems likely to be an artifact on the development cycle on
> next-20250317.

I confirm that with a vanilla 6.14.0-rc3 + the 64k-sector-size patches a 2.5
hour run generic/750 doesn't crash at all. So indeed something on the
development cycle leads to this particular crash.

  Luis

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-19 19:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-10  7:43 [linux-next:master] [block/bdev] 3c20917120: BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_mm/util.c kernel test robot
2025-03-11 12:10 ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-12  5:02   ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-03-18  5:28   ` Oliver Sang
2025-03-18  8:15     ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-03-18 14:37       ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-03-18 23:17         ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-03-19  2:58           ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-03-19 16:55             ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-03-19 19:16               ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2025-03-19 19:24                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-03-20 12:11                   ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-03-20 12:18                     ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-03-22 23:14                     ` Johannes Weiner
2025-03-23  1:02                       ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-03-23  7:07                         ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-03-25  6:52                           ` Oliver Sang
2025-03-28  1:44                             ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-03-28  4:21                               ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-03-28  9:47                                 ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-03-28 19:09                                   ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-03-29  0:08                                     ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-03-29  1:06                                       ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-03-31  7:45                                       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-08 16:43                                         ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-08 17:06                                           ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-04-08 17:24                                             ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-04-08 17:48                                               ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-08 17:51                                                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-04-08 18:02                                                   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-08 18:51                                                     ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-04-08 19:13                                                       ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-04-08 19:13                                                       ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-04-08 18:06                                                 ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-03-20  1:24       ` Lai, Yi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z9sYGccL4TocoITf@bombadil.infradead.org \
    --to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=da.gomez@samsung.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox