From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C14FA20E704; Wed, 19 Mar 2025 19:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742411803; cv=none; b=QkTTQIRENjuYvk7mgYXDMQMOThMz++ilIlOqEhprH/gpaDI68PnzbnQMHtX0y8TJoKaW1lMRAbGl6+SPl57aYTpQFH7kVC/noew0dqETXwOxQHfQN7r3j8K5Jn+nqBnm+DwusslA1X6gm0CUqB+OYwN62SkrFxWjoljbE2in7FU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742411803; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qjx1B59hoS6fWrjlxV8KqXGYvk4wKJyBCj4Y5hG4/gY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=E/+ViLjgudEYh0LEd3wwoBOWYsj43DB6RQX8GnuKrdH3IrL5wWPbughxIhPxzBu0AKoTWhkGVVnoMsQiQZzRQhyM9tyIOw9oHsGCTcbUvMFLNUIVlciqRgZfP8CPMlzVRLm9EGZvk3JMPnESlxkLEw31uVFmk+jBhxISUFlO1DU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Nf0MV1S+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Nf0MV1S+" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC98BC4CEE4; Wed, 19 Mar 2025 19:16:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1742411803; bh=qjx1B59hoS6fWrjlxV8KqXGYvk4wKJyBCj4Y5hG4/gY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Nf0MV1S+x03uJtoprF9Fu0OaQNr/sJO0Rg5YAsotBru3nXsJF4F3E97Lp2oJbgjb9 jla4voX6Eq03V7rGcCpnvD9/0HTbaYePcLmYqF/iqF8mHXtVdfmQrzpMFyh7xsE+IJ HiECSRS8lBou0qWgPpfAc7lY9b430yWTzqA1a2MI6KgP9v/IlxXav6cnTp3enchzMx Kx4PAUYV53+vkrerfG+TVPWTnqF9Vc2hCktYsleh0rlotzUFBBctIjC6Z7w5fkSmLa Jf5Srmo1CSlnmZfSBa/rzHybpVDwwegNY8KA5+4TFSJfeMbZevQUVJwgDiOZCrBWrc hvU5+P+HcSreA== Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 12:16:41 -0700 From: Luis Chamberlain To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Jan Kara , Oliver Sang , David Hildenbrand , Alistair Popple , linux-mm@kvack.org, Christian Brauner , Hannes Reinecke , oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com, John Garry , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, ltp@lists.linux.it, Pankaj Raghav , Daniel Gomez , David Bueso Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] [block/bdev] 3c20917120: BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_mm/util.c Message-ID: References: <202503101536.27099c77-lkp@intel.com> <20250311-testphasen-behelfen-09b950bbecbf@brauner> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 09:55:11AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > FWIW, I'm not seeing this crash or any kernel splat within the > same time (I'll let this run the full 2.5 hours now to verify) on > vanilla 6.14.0-rc3 + the 64k-sector-size patches, which would explain why I > hadn't seen this in my earlier testing over 10 ext4 profiles on fstests. This > particular crash seems likely to be an artifact on the development cycle on > next-20250317. I confirm that with a vanilla 6.14.0-rc3 + the 64k-sector-size patches a 2.5 hour run generic/750 doesn't crash at all. So indeed something on the development cycle leads to this particular crash. Luis