linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
	kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] blk-mq: enforce op-specific segment limits in blk_insert_cloned_request
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 09:57:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZAACeb0/Pfw8XN3a@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230301000655.48112-1-ushankar@purestorage.com>

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 05:06:55PM -0700, Uday Shankar wrote:
> The block layer might merge together discard requests up until the
> max_discard_segments limit is hit, but blk_insert_cloned_request checks
> the segment count against max_segments regardless of the req op. This
> can result in errors like the following when discards are issued through
> a DM device and max_discard_segments exceeds max_segments for the queue
> of the chosen underlying device.
> 
> blk_insert_cloned_request: over max segments limit. (256 > 129)
> 
> Fix this by looking at the req_op and enforcing the appropriate segment
> limit - max_discard_segments for REQ_OP_DISCARDs and max_segments for
> everything else.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>

Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>

Thanks,
Ming


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-02  1:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-01  0:06 [PATCH v3] blk-mq: enforce op-specific segment limits in blk_insert_cloned_request Uday Shankar
2023-03-01  0:33 ` Keith Busch
2023-03-02  1:57 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2023-03-03  4:00 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZAACeb0/Pfw8XN3a@T590 \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    --cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).