* [PATCH v3] blk-mq: enforce op-specific segment limits in blk_insert_cloned_request
@ 2023-03-01 0:06 Uday Shankar
2023-03-01 0:33 ` Keith Busch
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Uday Shankar @ 2023-03-01 0:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe, Alasdair Kergon, Mike Snitzer, Christoph Hellwig,
Keith Busch
Cc: linux-block, dm-devel, Uday Shankar, kernel test robot
The block layer might merge together discard requests up until the
max_discard_segments limit is hit, but blk_insert_cloned_request checks
the segment count against max_segments regardless of the req op. This
can result in errors like the following when discards are issued through
a DM device and max_discard_segments exceeds max_segments for the queue
of the chosen underlying device.
blk_insert_cloned_request: over max segments limit. (256 > 129)
Fix this by looking at the req_op and enforcing the appropriate segment
limit - max_discard_segments for REQ_OP_DISCARDs and max_segments for
everything else.
Signed-off-by: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
---
Changes v1-v2:
- Fixed format specifier type mismatch
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202302162040.FaI25ul2-lkp@intel.com/
Changes v2-v3:
- Refactor: move pre-existing blk_rq_get_max_segments to blk.h and use
it instead of introducing a new function
block/blk-merge.c | 7 -------
block/blk-mq.c | 7 ++++---
block/blk.h | 7 +++++++
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
index 1ac782fdc..6460abdb2 100644
--- a/block/blk-merge.c
+++ b/block/blk-merge.c
@@ -587,13 +587,6 @@ int __blk_rq_map_sg(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__blk_rq_map_sg);
-static inline unsigned int blk_rq_get_max_segments(struct request *rq)
-{
- if (req_op(rq) == REQ_OP_DISCARD)
- return queue_max_discard_segments(rq->q);
- return queue_max_segments(rq->q);
-}
-
static inline unsigned int blk_rq_get_max_sectors(struct request *rq,
sector_t offset)
{
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index d3494a796..d0cb2ef18 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -3000,6 +3000,7 @@ blk_status_t blk_insert_cloned_request(struct request *rq)
{
struct request_queue *q = rq->q;
unsigned int max_sectors = blk_queue_get_max_sectors(q, req_op(rq));
+ unsigned int max_segments = blk_rq_get_max_segments(rq);
blk_status_t ret;
if (blk_rq_sectors(rq) > max_sectors) {
@@ -3026,9 +3027,9 @@ blk_status_t blk_insert_cloned_request(struct request *rq)
* original queue.
*/
rq->nr_phys_segments = blk_recalc_rq_segments(rq);
- if (rq->nr_phys_segments > queue_max_segments(q)) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "%s: over max segments limit. (%hu > %hu)\n",
- __func__, rq->nr_phys_segments, queue_max_segments(q));
+ if (rq->nr_phys_segments > max_segments) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "%s: over max segments limit. (%u > %u)\n",
+ __func__, rq->nr_phys_segments, max_segments);
return BLK_STS_IOERR;
}
diff --git a/block/blk.h b/block/blk.h
index e835f21d4..cc4e8873d 100644
--- a/block/blk.h
+++ b/block/blk.h
@@ -156,6 +156,13 @@ static inline bool blk_discard_mergable(struct request *req)
return false;
}
+static inline unsigned int blk_rq_get_max_segments(struct request *rq)
+{
+ if (req_op(rq) == REQ_OP_DISCARD)
+ return queue_max_discard_segments(rq->q);
+ return queue_max_segments(rq->q);
+}
+
static inline unsigned int blk_queue_get_max_sectors(struct request_queue *q,
enum req_op op)
{
base-commit: bdc9c96cfce220e972136493f4c031f28ecb9f36
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] blk-mq: enforce op-specific segment limits in blk_insert_cloned_request
2023-03-01 0:06 [PATCH v3] blk-mq: enforce op-specific segment limits in blk_insert_cloned_request Uday Shankar
@ 2023-03-01 0:33 ` Keith Busch
2023-03-02 1:57 ` Ming Lei
2023-03-03 4:00 ` Jens Axboe
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Keith Busch @ 2023-03-01 0:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Uday Shankar
Cc: Jens Axboe, Alasdair Kergon, Mike Snitzer, Christoph Hellwig,
linux-block, dm-devel, kernel test robot
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 05:06:55PM -0700, Uday Shankar wrote:
> The block layer might merge together discard requests up until the
> max_discard_segments limit is hit, but blk_insert_cloned_request checks
> the segment count against max_segments regardless of the req op. This
> can result in errors like the following when discards are issued through
> a DM device and max_discard_segments exceeds max_segments for the queue
> of the chosen underlying device.
>
> blk_insert_cloned_request: over max segments limit. (256 > 129)
>
> Fix this by looking at the req_op and enforcing the appropriate segment
> limit - max_discard_segments for REQ_OP_DISCARDs and max_segments for
> everything else.
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] blk-mq: enforce op-specific segment limits in blk_insert_cloned_request
2023-03-01 0:06 [PATCH v3] blk-mq: enforce op-specific segment limits in blk_insert_cloned_request Uday Shankar
2023-03-01 0:33 ` Keith Busch
@ 2023-03-02 1:57 ` Ming Lei
2023-03-03 4:00 ` Jens Axboe
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2023-03-02 1:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Uday Shankar
Cc: Jens Axboe, Alasdair Kergon, Mike Snitzer, Christoph Hellwig,
Keith Busch, linux-block, dm-devel, kernel test robot
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 05:06:55PM -0700, Uday Shankar wrote:
> The block layer might merge together discard requests up until the
> max_discard_segments limit is hit, but blk_insert_cloned_request checks
> the segment count against max_segments regardless of the req op. This
> can result in errors like the following when discards are issued through
> a DM device and max_discard_segments exceeds max_segments for the queue
> of the chosen underlying device.
>
> blk_insert_cloned_request: over max segments limit. (256 > 129)
>
> Fix this by looking at the req_op and enforcing the appropriate segment
> limit - max_discard_segments for REQ_OP_DISCARDs and max_segments for
> everything else.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Ming
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] blk-mq: enforce op-specific segment limits in blk_insert_cloned_request
2023-03-01 0:06 [PATCH v3] blk-mq: enforce op-specific segment limits in blk_insert_cloned_request Uday Shankar
2023-03-01 0:33 ` Keith Busch
2023-03-02 1:57 ` Ming Lei
@ 2023-03-03 4:00 ` Jens Axboe
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2023-03-03 4:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alasdair Kergon, Mike Snitzer, Christoph Hellwig, Keith Busch,
Uday Shankar
Cc: linux-block, dm-devel, kernel test robot
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 17:06:55 -0700, Uday Shankar wrote:
> The block layer might merge together discard requests up until the
> max_discard_segments limit is hit, but blk_insert_cloned_request checks
> the segment count against max_segments regardless of the req op. This
> can result in errors like the following when discards are issued through
> a DM device and max_discard_segments exceeds max_segments for the queue
> of the chosen underlying device.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] blk-mq: enforce op-specific segment limits in blk_insert_cloned_request
commit: 49d24398327e32265eccdeec4baeb5a6a609c0bd
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-03-03 4:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-03-01 0:06 [PATCH v3] blk-mq: enforce op-specific segment limits in blk_insert_cloned_request Uday Shankar
2023-03-01 0:33 ` Keith Busch
2023-03-02 1:57 ` Ming Lei
2023-03-03 4:00 ` Jens Axboe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).