linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: syzbot <syzbot+4a08ffdf3667b36650a1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, djwong@kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	song@kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, tytso@mit.edu,
	yukuai3@huawei.com, zhang_shurong@foxmail.com,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [xfs?] [ext4?] kernel BUG in __block_write_begin_int
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 18:33:41 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZPWWZeWliX7RhOAZ@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000000000000e76944060483798d@google.com>

[cc linux-block, Christoph]

On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 12:29:52AM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> syzbot found the following issue on:
> 
> HEAD commit:    0468be89b3fa Merge tag 'iommu-updates-v6.6' of git://git.k..
> git tree:       upstream
> console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=11145910680000
> kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=3d78b3780d210e21
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=4a08ffdf3667b36650a1
> compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
> syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=164f7a57a80000
> C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=143b0298680000
> 
> Downloadable assets:
> disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/f3914b539822/disk-0468be89.raw.xz
> vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/6128b0644784/vmlinux-0468be89.xz
> kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/349d98668c3a/bzImage-0468be89.xz
> mounted in repro: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/75bd68910fd4/mount_0.gz
> 
> The issue was bisected to:
> 
> commit 8b0472b50bcf0f19a5119b00a53b63579c8e1e4d
> Author: Zhang Shurong <zhang_shurong@foxmail.com>
> Date:   Sat Jul 22 07:53:53 2023 +0000
> 
>     md: raid1: fix potential OOB in raid1_remove_disk()

Bisect is broken. That has nothing to do with the block device
conversion to use iomap that triggered this.

The commit that made this change was 487c607df790 ("block: use iomap
for writes to block devices"), and that's why we're getting a
BUG_ON() being triggered in iomap_to_bh()....

> bisection log:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=16e52577a80000
> final oops:     https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=15e52577a80000
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=11e52577a80000
> 
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+4a08ffdf3667b36650a1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: 8b0472b50bcf ("md: raid1: fix potential OOB in raid1_remove_disk()")
> 
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:2028!
> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
> CPU: 0 PID: 5187 Comm: syz-executor424 Not tainted 6.5.0-syzkaller-10885-g0468be89b3fa #0
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/26/2023
> RIP: 0010:iomap_to_bh fs/buffer.c:2028 [inline]
> RIP: 0010:__block_write_begin_int+0x18f7/0x1a40 fs/buffer.c:2111
> Code: af 0d 85 ff 48 8b 7c 24 08 48 c7 c6 20 22 18 8b e8 6e 8b c6 ff 0f 0b e8 97 0d 85 ff eb 13 e8 90 0d 85 ff eb c7 e8 89 0d 85 ff <0f> 0b e8 82 0d 85 ff 48 8b 7c 24 08 48 c7 c6 20 22 18 8b e8 41 8b
> RSP: 0018:ffffc9000418f520 EFLAGS: 00010293
> RAX: ffffffff82087b37 RBX: 0000000000040000 RCX: ffff888078093b80
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000040000 RDI: 00000000000d0000
> RBP: ffffc9000418f6b0 R08: ffffffff82086ba2 R09: 1ffff1100f27203a
> R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed100f27203b R12: 00000000000d0000
> R13: 0000000000000400 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff8880793901d0
> FS:  00007f0623ec56c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 0000000020040000 CR3: 0000000067478000 CR4: 00000000003506f0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Call Trace:
>  <TASK>
>  iomap_write_begin+0xaf6/0x1f00 fs/iomap/buffered-io.c:772
>  iomap_write_iter fs/iomap/buffered-io.c:907 [inline]
>  iomap_file_buffered_write+0x587/0x1020 fs/iomap/buffered-io.c:968
>  blkdev_buffered_write block/fops.c:634 [inline]
>  blkdev_write_iter+0x41d/0x5c0 block/fops.c:688
>  call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:1985 [inline]
>  new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:491 [inline]
>  vfs_write+0x782/0xaf0 fs/read_write.c:584
>  ksys_write+0x1a0/0x2c0 fs/read_write.c:637
>  do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
>  do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

It appears that 0010:__block_write_begin_int() has iterated beyond
the iomap that was passed in, triggering the BUG_ON() check in
iomap_to_bh().

Definitely not an XFS problem. Most likely not an ext4 problem.
It appears to be related to syzbot trying to modify the block device
under a mounted ext4 filesystem given the reproducer involves
mounting an ext4 filesystem, then the process that mounted the ext4
filesystem hits a BUG_ON trying to write to a block device.

Certainly seems like a block device problem, though, given
the new iomap write path in the block device merged in the 6.6-rc1 window.

#syz set subsystems: block

-Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

       reply	other threads:[~2023-09-04  8:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <000000000000e76944060483798d@google.com>
2023-09-04  8:33 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2023-09-04 13:26   ` [syzbot] [xfs?] [ext4?] kernel BUG in __block_write_begin_int Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZPWWZeWliX7RhOAZ@dread.disaster.area \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+4a08ffdf3667b36650a1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhang_shurong@foxmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).