linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Theurer <atheurer@redhat.com>,
	Joe Mario <jmario@redhat.com>, Sebastian Jug <sejug@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: add module parameter to not run block kworker on isolated CPUs
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 20:23:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZSk2wNH4KIR4rR+N@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZSkpUFlw8FINofLG@lothringen>

On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 01:26:08PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 08:45:44AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > +static bool respect_cpu_isolation;
> > > +module_param(respect_cpu_isolation, bool, 0444);
> > > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(respect_cpu_isolation,
> > > +		"Don't schedule blk-mq worker on isolated CPUs passed in "
> > > +		"isolcpus= or nohz_full=. User need to guarantee to not run "
> > > +		"block IO on isolated CPUs (default: false)");
> > 
> > Any chance we can centralize these? It's no fun to try to hunt down module
> > params to opt in different subsystems and the housekeeping interface does
> > have some provisions for selecting different parts. I'd much prefer to see
> > these settings to be collected into a central place.
> 
> Do we need this parameter in the first place? Shouldn't we avoid scheduling
> blk-mq worker on isolated CPUs in any case?

Yeah, I think this parameter isn't necessary, will remove it in V2.


Thanks,
Ming


      reply	other threads:[~2023-10-13 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-10 14:22 [PATCH] blk-mq: add module parameter to not run block kworker on isolated CPUs Ming Lei
2023-10-10 18:45 ` Tejun Heo
2023-10-11  0:39   ` Ming Lei
2023-10-12 19:55     ` Tejun Heo
2023-10-13  2:01       ` Ming Lei
2023-10-13 11:26   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 12:23     ` Ming Lei [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZSk2wNH4KIR4rR+N@fedora \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=atheurer@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jmario@redhat.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sejug@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).