From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>,
ming.lei@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: make sure active queue usage is held for bio_integrity_prep()
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 16:11:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZUyUSBrp+K5pPLPy@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZUyKggKLWnaZMRr7@infradead.org>
On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 11:30:10PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> > @@ -2858,11 +2858,8 @@ static struct request *blk_mq_get_new_requests(struct request_queue *q,
> > };
> > struct request *rq;
> >
> > - if (unlikely(bio_queue_enter(bio)))
> > - return NULL;
> > -
> > if (blk_mq_attempt_bio_merge(q, bio, nsegs))
> > - goto queue_exit;
> > + return NULL;
> >
> > rq_qos_throttle(q, bio);
>
> For clarity splitting this out might be a bit more readable.
I'd rather not do too many things in single fix, which need backport,
but I am fine to do it in following cleanup.
>
> > +static inline struct request *blk_mq_cached_req(const struct request_queue *q,
> > + const struct blk_plug *plug)
> > +{
> > + if (plug) {
> > + struct request *rq = rq_list_peek(&plug->cached_rq);
> > +
> > + if (rq && rq->q == q)
> > + return rq;
> > + }
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
>
> Not sure this helper adds much value over just open coding it.
I am fine with either way, but the function name actually
has document benefit.
>
> > +/* return true if this bio needs to handle by allocating new request */
> > +static inline bool blk_mq_try_cached_rq(struct request *rq,
> > struct blk_plug *plug, struct bio **bio, unsigned int nsegs)
>
> The polarity here is a bit weird, I'd expect a true return if the
> request can be used and a naming implying that.
Fine, my original local version actually returns false if cached req can
be used, and it is changed just for not checking
!blk_mq_try_cached_rq().
>
> > + rq = blk_mq_cached_req(q, plug);
> > + if (rq) {
> > + /* cached request held queue usage counter */
> > + if (!bio_integrity_prep(bio))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + need_alloc = blk_mq_try_cached_rq(rq, plug, &bio, nr_segs);
> > if (!bio)
> > return;
>
> If you take the blk_mq_attempt_bio_merge merge out of the helper,
> the calling convention becomes much saner.
IMO we shouldn't mix cleanup with fix and it is friendly to take
stable backport into account.
>
> > + /* cached request held queue usage counter */
> > + percpu_ref_get(&q->q_usage_counter);
>
> I don't think we can just do the percpu_ref_get here. While getting
> the counter obviosuly can't fail, we still need to do the queue
> pm only check.
blk_pre_runtime_suspend() can't succeed if any active queue usage
counter is held, so it is fine to call percpu_ref_get() here.
>
> Below is the untested version of how I'd do this that I hacked while
> reviewing it:
>
> ---
> commit 1134ce39504c30a9804ed8147027e66bf7d3157e
> Author: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> Date: Wed Nov 8 16:05:04 2023 +0800
>
> blk-mq: make sure active queue usage is held for bio_integrity_prep()
>
> blk_integrity_unregister() can come if queue usage counter isn't held
> for one bio with integrity prepared, so this request may be completed with
> calling profile->complete_fn, then kernel panic.
>
> Another constraint is that bio_integrity_prep() needs to be called
> before bio merge.
>
> Fix the issue by:
>
> - call bio_integrity_prep() with one queue usage counter grabbed reliably
>
> - call bio_integrity_prep() before bio merge
>
> Fixes: 900e080752025f00 ("block: move queue enter logic into blk_mq_submit_bio()")
> Reported-by: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index e2d11183f62e37..b758dc8ed10957 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -2858,11 +2858,8 @@ static struct request *blk_mq_get_new_requests(struct request_queue *q,
> };
> struct request *rq;
>
> - if (unlikely(bio_queue_enter(bio)))
> - return NULL;
> -
> if (blk_mq_attempt_bio_merge(q, bio, nsegs))
> - goto queue_exit;
> + return NULL;
>
> rq_qos_throttle(q, bio);
>
> @@ -2878,35 +2875,24 @@ static struct request *blk_mq_get_new_requests(struct request_queue *q,
> rq_qos_cleanup(q, bio);
> if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT)
> bio_wouldblock_error(bio);
> -queue_exit:
> - blk_queue_exit(q);
> return NULL;
> }
>
> -static inline struct request *blk_mq_get_cached_request(struct request_queue *q,
> - struct blk_plug *plug, struct bio **bio, unsigned int nsegs)
> +/* return true if this @rq can be used for @bio */
> +static bool blk_mq_can_use_cached_rq(struct request *rq, struct blk_plug *plug,
> + struct bio *bio)
Switching to "*bio" is in my todo cleanup list too, and I will make it
standalone patch.
> {
> - struct request *rq;
> - enum hctx_type type, hctx_type;
> + struct request_queue *q = rq->q;
> + enum hctx_type type = blk_mq_get_hctx_type(bio->bi_opf);
> + enum hctx_type hctx_type = rq->mq_hctx->type;
>
> - if (!plug)
> - return NULL;
> - rq = rq_list_peek(&plug->cached_rq);
> - if (!rq || rq->q != q)
> - return NULL;
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(rq_list_peek(&plug->cached_rq) != rq);
>
> - if (blk_mq_attempt_bio_merge(q, *bio, nsegs)) {
> - *bio = NULL;
> - return NULL;
> - }
> -
> - type = blk_mq_get_hctx_type((*bio)->bi_opf);
> - hctx_type = rq->mq_hctx->type;
> if (type != hctx_type &&
> !(type == HCTX_TYPE_READ && hctx_type == HCTX_TYPE_DEFAULT))
> - return NULL;
> - if (op_is_flush(rq->cmd_flags) != op_is_flush((*bio)->bi_opf))
> - return NULL;
> + return false;
> + if (op_is_flush(rq->cmd_flags) != op_is_flush(bio->bi_opf))
> + return false;
>
> /*
> * If any qos ->throttle() end up blocking, we will have flushed the
> @@ -2914,12 +2900,12 @@ static inline struct request *blk_mq_get_cached_request(struct request_queue *q,
> * before we throttle.
> */
> plug->cached_rq = rq_list_next(rq);
> - rq_qos_throttle(q, *bio);
> + rq_qos_throttle(q, bio);
>
> blk_mq_rq_time_init(rq, 0);
> - rq->cmd_flags = (*bio)->bi_opf;
> + rq->cmd_flags = bio->bi_opf;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->queuelist);
> - return rq;
> + return true;
> }
>
> static void bio_set_ioprio(struct bio *bio)
> @@ -2949,7 +2935,7 @@ void blk_mq_submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
> struct blk_plug *plug = blk_mq_plug(bio);
> const int is_sync = op_is_sync(bio->bi_opf);
> struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
> - struct request *rq;
> + struct request *rq = NULL;
> unsigned int nr_segs = 1;
> blk_status_t ret;
>
> @@ -2960,20 +2946,39 @@ void blk_mq_submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
> return;
> }
>
> - if (!bio_integrity_prep(bio))
> - return;
> -
> bio_set_ioprio(bio);
>
> - rq = blk_mq_get_cached_request(q, plug, &bio, nr_segs);
> - if (!rq) {
> - if (!bio)
> + if (plug) {
> + rq = rq_list_peek(&plug->cached_rq);
> + if (rq && rq->q != q)
> + rq = NULL;
> + }
> + if (rq) {
> + /* rq already holds a q_usage_counter reference */
> + if (!bio_integrity_prep(bio))
> return;
> - rq = blk_mq_get_new_requests(q, plug, bio, nr_segs);
> - if (unlikely(!rq))
> + if (blk_mq_attempt_bio_merge(q, bio, nr_segs))
> + return;
> +
> + if (blk_mq_can_use_cached_rq(rq, plug, bio))
> + goto done;
> +
> + percpu_ref_get(&q->q_usage_counter);
> + } else {
> + if (unlikely(bio_queue_enter(bio)))
> + return;
> +
> + if (!bio_integrity_prep(bio))
> return;
blk_queue_exit() is needed if bio_integrity_prep() fails.
I will try to make one easy fix first, then follows cleanup.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-09 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-08 8:05 [PATCH] blk-mq: make sure active queue usage is held for bio_integrity_prep() Ming Lei
2023-11-09 7:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-09 8:11 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2023-11-09 14:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZUyUSBrp+K5pPLPy@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox