From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Phillip Lougher <phillip@squashfs.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] block: Rework bio_for_each_segment_all()
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 17:20:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZXGOc8HnUV2Q58SE@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231122232818.178256-1-kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 06:28:13PM -0500, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> This patch reworks bio_for_each_segment_all() to be more inline with how
> the other bio iterators work:
>
> - bio_iter_all_peek() now returns a synthesized bio_vec; we don't stash
> one in the iterator and pass a pointer to it - bad. This way makes it
> clearer what's a constructed value vs. a reference to something
> pre-existing, and it also will help with cleaning up and
> consolidating code with bio_for_each_folio_all().
>
> - We now provide bio_for_each_segment_all_continue(), for squashfs:
> this makes their code clearer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> Cc: Phillip Lougher <phillip@squashfs.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
The original way was just for avoiding tree-wide change and keep bvec
pointer, and peek & advance is more cleaner, for the block layer change:
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
thanks,
Ming
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-07 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-22 23:28 [PATCH 1/3] block: Rework bio_for_each_segment_all() Kent Overstreet
2023-11-22 23:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] block: Rework bio_for_each_folio_all(), add bio_for_each_folio() Kent Overstreet
2023-12-07 19:02 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-12-07 20:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-12-07 20:45 ` Keith Busch
2023-12-07 22:11 ` Eric Biggers
2023-11-22 23:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: Add documentation for bio iterator macros Kent Overstreet
2023-12-07 9:21 ` Ming Lei
2023-12-06 21:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: Rework bio_for_each_segment_all() Kent Overstreet
2023-12-06 22:40 ` Jens Axboe
2023-12-06 23:27 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-12-07 17:57 ` Jens Axboe
2023-12-07 18:06 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-12-07 18:26 ` Jens Axboe
2023-12-07 20:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-12-07 21:01 ` Jens Axboe
2023-12-07 21:04 ` Jens Axboe
2023-12-07 9:20 ` Ming Lei [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZXGOc8HnUV2Q58SE@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phillip@squashfs.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox