From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
"Shinichiro Kawasaki" <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/15] block: move debugfs/sysfs register out of freezing queue
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 20:41:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_5UDa_d5Fubx2_j@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43325beb-6147-4f51-8e79-0c31db2ef742@linux.ibm.com>
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 05:51:07PM +0530, Nilay Shroff wrote:
>
>
> On 4/15/25 5:24 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Why is updating nr_requests related with removing hctx attributes?
> >>>
> >>> Can you explain the side effect in details?
> >> Thread 1:
> >> writing-to-blk-mq-sysfs-attribute-nr_requests
> >> -> queue_requests_store ==> freezes queue and acquires ->elevator_lock
> >> -> blk_mq_update_nr_requests
> >> -> blk_mq_tag_update_depth
> >> -> blk_mq_alloc_map_and_rqs
> >> -> blk_mq_alloc_rq_map
> >> -> blk_mq_init_tags ==> updates ->nr_tags and ->nr_reserved_tags
> >>
> >> Thread2:
> >> blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues
> >> -> __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues
> >> -> blk_mq_realloc_tag_set_tags
> >> -> __blk_mq_alloc_map_and_rqs
> >> -> blk_mq_alloc_map_and_rqs
> >> -> blk_mq_alloc_rq_map
> >> -> blk_mq_init_tags ==> updates ->nr_tags and ->nr_reserved_tags
> >>
> >> Thread 3:
> >> reading-hctx-sysfs-attribute-nr_tags
> >> -> blk_mq_hw_sysfs_show ==> acquires ->elevaor_lock
> >> -> blk_mq_hw_sysfs_nr_tags_show ==> access nr_tags
> >>
> >> Thread 4:
> >> reading-hctx-sysfs-attribute-nr_reserved_tags
> >> -> blk_mq_hw_sysfs_show ==> acquires ->elevaor_lock
> >> -> blk_mq_hw_sysfs_nr_reserved_tags_show ==> access nr_reserved_tags
> >
> > `hctx->tags` is guaranteed to be live if above ->show() method, and the
> > elevator lock is actually not needed, which isn't supposed to protect
> > hctx->tags too.
> >
> I think, the ->elavtor_lock would still be needed for protecting updates to
> hctx->tags from thread # 1 above and simultaneously reading the hctx->tags from
> thread #3 and #4 above.
update_nr_requests() can just reduce ->tags.sbitmap size, please see
blk_mq_tag_update_depth(), even it won't change hctx->tags->nr_tags, so there
isn't race.
More importantly ->elevator_lock shouldn't cover ->tags which isn't related
with scheduler, one exception is blk-mq debugfs, in which request may be
allocated from ->sched_tags, even ->tags is visiting.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-15 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-10 13:30 [PATCH 00/15] block: unify elevator changing and fix lockdep warning Ming Lei
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 01/15] block: don't call freeze queue in elevator_switch() and elevator_disable() Ming Lei
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 02/15] block: add two helpers for registering/un-registering sched debugfs Ming Lei
2025-04-10 14:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 03/15] block: move sched debugfs register into elvevator_register_queue Ming Lei
2025-04-10 14:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-14 0:42 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 04/15] block: prevent elevator switch during updating nr_hw_queues Ming Lei
2025-04-10 14:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-14 0:54 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-14 6:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-15 2:03 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-11 19:13 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-14 0:55 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 05/15] block: simplify elevator reset for " Ming Lei
2025-04-10 14:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-10 15:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-14 0:58 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-14 6:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-15 2:05 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 06/15] block: add helper of elevator_change() Ming Lei
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 07/15] block: move blk_unregister_queue() & device_del() after freeze wait Ming Lei
2025-04-14 6:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-15 2:26 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 08/15] block: add `struct elev_change_ctx` for unifying elevator change Ming Lei
2025-04-14 6:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 09/15] block: " Ming Lei
2025-04-10 18:37 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-14 1:22 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-15 12:30 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-16 1:49 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 10/15] block: pass elevator_queue to elv_register_queue & unregister_queue Ming Lei
2025-04-14 6:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-15 2:31 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-16 4:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 11/15] block: move elv_register[unregister]_queue out of elevator_lock Ming Lei
2025-04-11 19:20 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-14 1:24 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-15 9:39 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-15 10:32 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 12/15] block: move debugfs/sysfs register out of freezing queue Ming Lei
2025-04-10 18:57 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-14 1:42 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-15 9:37 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-15 10:06 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-15 11:15 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-15 11:54 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-15 12:21 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-15 12:41 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 13/15] block: remove several ->elevator_lock Ming Lei
2025-04-10 19:07 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-14 1:46 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 14/15] block: move hctx cpuhp add/del out of queue freezing Ming Lei
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 15/15] block: move wbt_enable_default() out of queue freezing from scheduler's ->exit() Ming Lei
2025-04-10 19:20 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-14 1:55 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z_5UDa_d5Fubx2_j@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).