linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, djwong@kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loop: stop using vfs_iter_{read,write} for buffered I/O
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 21:44:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_Z5ydIl7UGkFrz6@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250409130940.3685677-1-hch@lst.de>

On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 03:09:40PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> vfs_iter_{read,write} always perform direct I/O when the file has the
> O_DIRECT flag set, which breaks disabling direct I/O using the
> LOOP_SET_STATUS / LOOP_SET_STATUS64 ioctls.

So dio is disabled automatically because lo_offset is changed in
LOOP_SET_STATUS, but backing file is still opened with O_DIRECT,
then dio fails?

But Darrick reports it is caused by changing sector size, instead of
LOOP_SET_STATUS.

> 
> This was recenly reported as a regression, but as far as I can tell
> was only uncovered by better checking for block sizes and has been
> around since the direct I/O support was added.

What is the 1st real bad commit for this regression? I think it is useful
for backporting. Or it is new test case?

> 
> Fix this by using the existing aio code that calls the raw read/write
> iter methods instead.  Note that despite the comments there is no need
> for block drivers to ever call flush_dcache_page themselves, and the
> call is a left-over from prehistoric times.
> 
> Fixes: ab1cb278bc70 ("block: loop: introduce ioctl command of LOOP_SET_DIRECT_IO")

Why is the issue related with ioctl(LOOP_SET_DIRECT_IO)?


Thanks, 
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-09 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-09 13:09 [PATCH] loop: stop using vfs_iter_{read,write} for buffered I/O Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-09 13:44 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-04-10  7:34   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-10 22:07     ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-15  3:33     ` Ming Lei
2025-04-15  3:41 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-16  0:47   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-16  0:59 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z_Z5ydIl7UGkFrz6@fedora \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).