public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, hongyu.jin.cn@gmail.com, ebiggers@kernel.org,
	dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Hongyu Jin <hongyu.jin@unisoc.com>,
	Yibin Ding <yibin.ding@unisoc.com>,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/5] block: Fix where bio IO priority gets set
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 11:19:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZbsNytjvvPLNNwx4@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240130202638.62600-2-snitzer@kernel.org>

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 03:26:34PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> From: Hongyu Jin <hongyu.jin@unisoc.com>
> 
> Commit 82b74cac2849 ("blk-ioprio: Convert from rqos policy to direct
> call") pushed setting bio I/O priority down into blk_mq_submit_bio()
> -- which is too low within block core's submit_bio() because it
> skips setting I/O priority for block drivers that implement
> fops->submit_bio() (e.g. DM, MD, etc).
> 
> Fix this by moving bio_set_ioprio() up from blk-mq.c to blk-core.c and
> call it from submit_bio().  This ensures all block drivers call
> bio_set_ioprio() during initial bio submission.
> 
> Fixes: a78418e6a04c ("block: Always initialize bio IO priority on submit")
> Co-developed-by: Yibin Ding <yibin.ding@unisoc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yibin Ding <yibin.ding@unisoc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hongyu Jin <hongyu.jin@unisoc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
> [snitzer: revised commit header]
> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>

Looks fine,

Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>


Thanks,
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-01  3:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-30 20:26 [PATCH v9 0/5] Fix I/O priority lost in device-mapper Mike Snitzer
2024-01-30 20:26 ` [PATCH v9 1/5] block: Fix where bio IO priority gets set Mike Snitzer
2024-02-01  3:19   ` Ming Lei [this message]
2024-01-30 20:26 ` [PATCH v9 2/5] dm io: Support IO priority Mike Snitzer
2024-01-30 20:26 ` [PATCH v9 3/5] dm bufio: " Mike Snitzer
2024-01-30 20:26 ` [PATCH v9 4/5] dm verity: Fix IO priority lost when reading FEC and hash Mike Snitzer
2024-01-30 20:26 ` [PATCH v9 5/5] dm crypt: Fix IO priority lost when queuing write bios Mike Snitzer
2024-02-01 18:00 ` (subset) [PATCH v9 0/5] Fix I/O priority lost in device-mapper Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZbsNytjvvPLNNwx4@fedora \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ebiggers@google.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=hongyu.jin.cn@gmail.com \
    --cc=hongyu.jin@unisoc.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    --cc=yibin.ding@unisoc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox