From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: djwong@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, chandan.babu@oracle.com,
axboe@kernel.dk, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, jbongio@google.com,
ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/14] fs: xfs: Support atomic write for statx
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 08:31:14 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZejgovFe/pWCQ4uM@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240304130428.13026-13-john.g.garry@oracle.com>
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 01:04:26PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> Support providing info on atomic write unit min and max for an inode.
>
> For simplicity, currently we limit the min at the FS block size, but a
> lower limit could be supported in future. This is required by iomap
> DIO.
>
> The atomic write unit min and max is limited by the guaranteed extent
> alignment for the inode.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> index a0d77f5f512e..6316448083d2 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> @@ -546,6 +546,37 @@ xfs_stat_blksize(
> return PAGE_SIZE;
> }
>
> +static void
> +xfs_get_atomic_write_attr(
> + struct xfs_inode *ip,
> + unsigned int *unit_min,
> + unsigned int *unit_max)
> +{
> + xfs_extlen_t extsz = xfs_get_extsz(ip);
> + struct xfs_buftarg *target = xfs_inode_buftarg(ip);
> + struct block_device *bdev = target->bt_bdev;
> + struct request_queue *q = bdev->bd_queue;
> + struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
> + struct xfs_sb *sbp = &mp->m_sb;
> + unsigned int awu_min, awu_max;
> + unsigned int extsz_bytes = XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, extsz);
> +
> + awu_min = queue_atomic_write_unit_min_bytes(q);
> + awu_max = queue_atomic_write_unit_max_bytes(q);
We really should be storing these in the xfs_buftarg at mount time,
like we do logical and physical sector sizes. Similar to sector
sizes, they *must not change* once the filesystem has been created
on the device, let alone during an active mount. The whole point of
the xfs_buftarg is to store the information the filesystem
needs to do IO to the underlying block device so we don't have to
chase pointers deep into the block device whenever we need to use
static geometry information.....
> + if (sbp->sb_blocksize > awu_max || awu_min > sbp->sb_blocksize ||
> + !xfs_inode_atomicwrites(ip)) {
> + *unit_min = 0;
> + *unit_max = 0;
> + return;
> + }
Again, this is comparing static geometry - if the block size doesn't
allow atomic writes, then the inode flag should never be set. i.e.
geometry is checked when configuring atomic writes, not in every
place we need to check if atomic writes are supported. Hence this
should simply be:
if (!xfs_inode_has_atomic_writes(ip)) {
*unit_min = 0;
*unit_max = 0;
return;
}
before we even look at the xfs_buftarg to get the supported min/max
values for the given device.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-06 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-04 13:04 [PATCH v2 00/14] block atomic writes for XFS John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] block: Add blk_validate_atomic_write_op_size() John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] fs: xfs: Don't use low-space allocator for alignment > 1 John Garry
2024-03-04 22:15 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-05 13:36 ` John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] fs: xfs: Introduce FORCEALIGN inode flag John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] fs: xfs: Make file data allocations observe the 'forcealign' flag John Garry
2024-03-05 0:44 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-05 15:22 ` John Garry
2024-03-05 22:18 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-06 9:41 ` John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] fs: xfs: Enable file data forcealign feature John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] fs: xfs: Do not free EOF blocks for forcealign John Garry
2024-03-06 21:07 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-07 11:38 ` John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] fs: iomap: Sub-extent zeroing John Garry
2024-03-06 21:14 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-07 11:51 ` John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] fs: xfs: " John Garry
2024-03-06 22:00 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-07 12:57 ` John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] fs: Add FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES flag John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] fs: iomap: Atomic write support John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] fs: xfs: Support FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES for forcealign John Garry
2024-03-06 21:43 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-07 12:42 ` John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] fs: xfs: Support atomic write for statx John Garry
2024-03-06 21:31 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2024-03-07 10:35 ` John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] fs: xfs: Validate atomic writes John Garry
2024-03-06 21:22 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-07 10:19 ` John Garry
2024-03-04 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] fs: xfs: Support setting FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE John Garry
2024-03-06 21:33 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-07 11:55 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZejgovFe/pWCQ4uM@dread.disaster.area \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jbongio@google.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).