From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Chandan Babu R <chandanbabu@kernel.org>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] block: move discard checks into the ioctl handler
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 08:33:08 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZeoylEeVMt2fXT2R@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240307151157.466013-3-hch@lst.de>
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 08:11:49AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Most bio operations get basic sanity checking in submit_bio and anything
> more complicated than that is done in the callers. Discards are a bit
> different from that in that a lot of checking is done in
> __blkdev_issue_discard, and the specific errnos for that are returned
> to userspace. Move the checks that require specific errnos to the ioctl
> handler instead, and just leave the basic sanity checking in submit_bio
> for the other handlers. This introduces two changes in behavior:
>
> 1) the logical block size alignment check of the start and len is lost
> for non-ioctl callers.
> This matches what is done for other operations including reads and
> writes. We should probably verify this for all bios, but for now
> make discards match the normal flow.
> 2) for non-ioctl callers all errors are reported on I/O completion now
> instead of synchronously. Callers in general mostly ignore or log
> errors so this will actually simplify the code once cleaned up
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
OK.
> ---
> block/blk-lib.c | 13 -------------
> block/ioctl.c | 13 +++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-lib.c b/block/blk-lib.c
> index f873eb9a886f63..50923508a32466 100644
> --- a/block/blk-lib.c
> +++ b/block/blk-lib.c
> @@ -59,19 +59,6 @@ int __blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
> sector_t nr_sects, gfp_t gfp_mask, struct bio **biop)
> {
> struct bio *bio = *biop;
> - sector_t bs_mask;
> -
> - if (bdev_read_only(bdev))
> - return -EPERM;
> - if (!bdev_max_discard_sectors(bdev))
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -
> - bs_mask = (bdev_logical_block_size(bdev) >> 9) - 1;
> - if ((sector | nr_sects) & bs_mask)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - if (!nr_sects)
> - return -EINVAL;
>
> while (nr_sects) {
> sector_t req_sects =
> diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c
> index de0cc0d215c633..1d5de0a890c5e8 100644
> --- a/block/ioctl.c
> +++ b/block/ioctl.c
> @@ -95,6 +95,8 @@ static int compat_blkpg_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev,
> static int blk_ioctl_discard(struct block_device *bdev, blk_mode_t mode,
> unsigned long arg)
> {
> + sector_t bs_mask = (bdev_logical_block_size(bdev) >> SECTOR_SHIFT) - 1;
> + sector_t sector, nr_sects;
This changes the alignment checks from a hard coded 512 byte sector
to the logical block size of the device. I don't see a problem with
this (it fixes a bug) but it should at least be mentioned in the
commit message.
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-07 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-07 15:11 RFC: untangle and fix __blkdev_issue_discard Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-07 15:11 ` [PATCH 01/10] block: remove the discard_granularity check in __blkdev_issue_discard Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-07 15:11 ` [PATCH 02/10] block: move discard checks into the ioctl handler Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-07 21:33 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2024-03-08 15:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-08 21:16 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-07 15:11 ` [PATCH 03/10] block: add a blk_next_discard_bio helper Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-07 15:11 ` [PATCH 04/10] xfs: switch to using blk_next_discard_bio directly Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-07 15:11 ` [PATCH 05/10] f2fs: " Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-07 15:11 ` [PATCH 06/10] ext4: " Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-07 16:13 ` Keith Busch
2024-03-08 15:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-07 15:11 ` [PATCH 07/10] nvmet: " Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-07 15:11 ` [PATCH 08/10] md: " Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-07 15:11 ` [PATCH 09/10] dm-thin: " Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-07 15:11 ` [PATCH 10/10] block: remove __blkdev_issue_discard Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-07 21:05 ` RFC: untangle and fix __blkdev_issue_discard Keith Busch
2024-03-08 15:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZeoylEeVMt2fXT2R@dread.disaster.area \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=chandanbabu@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).