linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Chandan Babu R <chandanbabu@kernel.org>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] block: move discard checks into the ioctl handler
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 08:33:08 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZeoylEeVMt2fXT2R@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240307151157.466013-3-hch@lst.de>

On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 08:11:49AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Most bio operations get basic sanity checking in submit_bio and anything
> more complicated than that is done in the callers.  Discards are a bit
> different from that in that a lot of checking is done in
> __blkdev_issue_discard, and the specific errnos for that are returned
> to userspace.  Move the checks that require specific errnos to the ioctl
> handler instead, and just leave the basic sanity checking in submit_bio
> for the other handlers.  This introduces two changes in behavior:
> 
>  1) the logical block size alignment check of the start and len is lost
>     for non-ioctl callers.
>     This matches what is done for other operations including reads and
>     writes.  We should probably verify this for all bios, but for now
>     make discards match the normal flow.
>  2) for non-ioctl callers all errors are reported on I/O completion now
>     instead of synchronously.  Callers in general mostly ignore or log
>     errors so this will actually simplify the code once cleaned up
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

OK.

> ---
>  block/blk-lib.c | 13 -------------
>  block/ioctl.c   | 13 +++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-lib.c b/block/blk-lib.c
> index f873eb9a886f63..50923508a32466 100644
> --- a/block/blk-lib.c
> +++ b/block/blk-lib.c
> @@ -59,19 +59,6 @@ int __blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
>  		sector_t nr_sects, gfp_t gfp_mask, struct bio **biop)
>  {
>  	struct bio *bio = *biop;
> -	sector_t bs_mask;
> -
> -	if (bdev_read_only(bdev))
> -		return -EPERM;
> -	if (!bdev_max_discard_sectors(bdev))
> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -
> -	bs_mask = (bdev_logical_block_size(bdev) >> 9) - 1;
> -	if ((sector | nr_sects) & bs_mask)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
> -	if (!nr_sects)
> -		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	while (nr_sects) {
>  		sector_t req_sects =
> diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c
> index de0cc0d215c633..1d5de0a890c5e8 100644
> --- a/block/ioctl.c
> +++ b/block/ioctl.c
> @@ -95,6 +95,8 @@ static int compat_blkpg_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev,
>  static int blk_ioctl_discard(struct block_device *bdev, blk_mode_t mode,
>  		unsigned long arg)
>  {
> +	sector_t bs_mask = (bdev_logical_block_size(bdev) >> SECTOR_SHIFT) - 1;
> +	sector_t sector, nr_sects;

This changes the alignment checks from a hard coded 512 byte sector
to the logical block size of the device. I don't see a problem with
this (it fixes a bug) but it should at least be mentioned in the
commit message.

-Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-07 21:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-07 15:11 RFC: untangle and fix __blkdev_issue_discard Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-07 15:11 ` [PATCH 01/10] block: remove the discard_granularity check in __blkdev_issue_discard Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-07 15:11 ` [PATCH 02/10] block: move discard checks into the ioctl handler Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-07 21:33   ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2024-03-08 15:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-08 21:16       ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-07 15:11 ` [PATCH 03/10] block: add a blk_next_discard_bio helper Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-07 15:11 ` [PATCH 04/10] xfs: switch to using blk_next_discard_bio directly Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-07 15:11 ` [PATCH 05/10] f2fs: " Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-07 15:11 ` [PATCH 06/10] ext4: " Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-07 16:13   ` Keith Busch
2024-03-08 15:21     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-07 15:11 ` [PATCH 07/10] nvmet: " Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-07 15:11 ` [PATCH 08/10] md: " Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-07 15:11 ` [PATCH 09/10] dm-thin: " Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-07 15:11 ` [PATCH 10/10] block: remove __blkdev_issue_discard Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-07 21:05 ` RFC: untangle and fix __blkdev_issue_discard Keith Busch
2024-03-08 15:21   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZeoylEeVMt2fXT2R@dread.disaster.area \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=chandanbabu@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).