From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
ming.lei@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Improve IOPS by removing the fairness code
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:25:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZfzsMIGnaGhWCw80@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240321224605.107783-1-bvanassche@acm.org>
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 03:46:05PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> There is an algorithm in the block layer for maintaining fairness
> across queues that share a tag set. The sbitmap implementation has
> improved so much that we don't need the block layer fairness algorithm
> anymore and that we can rely on the sbitmap implementation to guarantee
> fairness.
>
> This patch removes the following code and structure members:
> - The function hctx_may_queue().
> - blk_mq_hw_ctx.nr_active and request_queue.nr_active_requests_shared_tags
> and also all the code that modifies these two member variables.
>
> On my test setup (x86 VM with 72 CPU cores) this patch results in 2.9% more
> IOPS. IOPS have been measured as follows:
>
> $ modprobe null_blk nr_devices=1 completion_nsec=0
> $ fio --bs=4096 --disable_clat=1 --disable_slat=1 --group_reporting=1 \
> --gtod_reduce=1 --invalidate=1 --ioengine=psync --ioscheduler=none \
> --norandommap --runtime=60 --rw=randread --thread --time_based=1 \
> --buffered=0 --numjobs=64 --name=/dev/nullb0 --filename=/dev/nullb0
The above test just covers single LUN test.
But the code you removed is actually for providing fairness over multi-LUN,
do you have multi-LUN test result for supporting the change?
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-22 2:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-21 22:46 [PATCH] block: Improve IOPS by removing the fairness code Bart Van Assche
2024-03-21 22:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-21 23:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-03-22 1:14 ` Yu Kuai
2024-03-22 16:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-03-21 22:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-03-22 2:25 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2024-03-22 16:11 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZfzsMIGnaGhWCw80@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox