linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] block: fail unaligned bio from submit_bio_noacct()
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 16:25:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZgC2UPEBOSLW9Xdz@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240324133702.1328237-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 09:37:02PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> +static bool bio_check_alignment(struct bio *bio, struct request_queue *q)
> +{
> +	unsigned int bs = q->limits.logical_block_size;
> +
> +	if (bio->bi_iter.bi_size & (bs - 1))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (bio->bi_iter.bi_sector & ((bs >> SECTOR_SHIFT) - 1))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return true;
> +}


This should still use bdev_logic_block_size.  And maybe it's just me,
but I think dropping thelines after the false returns would actually
make it more readle.

> diff --git a/block/fops.c b/block/fops.c
> index 679d9b752fe8..75595c728190 100644
> --- a/block/fops.c
> +++ b/block/fops.c
> @@ -37,8 +37,7 @@ static blk_opf_t dio_bio_write_op(struct kiocb *iocb)
>  static bool blkdev_dio_unaligned(struct block_device *bdev, loff_t pos,
>  			      struct iov_iter *iter)
>  {
> -	return pos & (bdev_logical_block_size(bdev) - 1) ||
> -		!bdev_iter_is_aligned(bdev, iter);
> +	return !bdev_iter_is_aligned(bdev, iter);

If you drop this:

 - we now actually go all the way down to building and submiting a
   bio for a trivial bounds check.
 - your get a trivial to trigger WARN_ON.

I'd strongly advise against dropping this check.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-24 23:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-24 13:37 [PATCH V2] block: fail unaligned bio from submit_bio_noacct() Ming Lei
2024-03-24 21:48 ` Mike Snitzer
2024-03-24 23:25 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-03-25  3:03   ` Ming Lei
2024-03-25  3:12     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-25  3:50       ` Ming Lei
2024-03-25 18:53 ` Keith Busch
2024-03-26  1:19   ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZgC2UPEBOSLW9Xdz@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).