From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, fstests@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: dm: use queue_limits_set
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 18:03:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZkvIn73jAqz94LjI@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240520201237.GA6235@lst.de>
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 10:12:37PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 01:17:46PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > Doubt there was anything in fstests setting max discard user limit
> > (max_user_discard_sectors) in Ted's case. blk_set_stacking_limits()
> > sets max_user_discard_sectors to UINT_MAX, so given the use of
> > min(lim->max_hw_discard_sectors, lim->max_user_discard_sectors) I
> > suspect blk_stack_limits() stacks up max_discard_sectors to match the
> > underlying storage's max_hw_discard_sectors.
> >
> > And max_hw_discard_sectors exceeds BIO_PRISON_MAX_RANGE, resulting in
> > dm_cell_key_has_valid_range() triggering on:
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(key->block_end - key->block_begin > BIO_PRISON_MAX_RANGE)
>
> Oh, that makes more sense.
>
> I think you just want to set the max_hw_discard_sectors limit before
> stacking in the lower device limits so that they can only lower it.
>
> (and in the long run we should just stop stacking the limits except
> for request based dm which really needs it)
This is what I staged, I cannot send a patch out right now..
Ted if you need the patch in email (rather than from linux-dm.git) I
can send it later tonight. Please see:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/commit/?h=dm-6.10&id=825d8bbd2f32cb229c3b6653bd454832c3c20acb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-20 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20240518022646.GA450709@mit.edu>
2024-05-19 5:05 ` dm: use queue_limits_set Mike Snitzer
2024-05-19 5:42 ` Mike Snitzer
2024-05-20 15:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-20 15:39 ` Mike Snitzer
2024-05-20 15:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-20 15:54 ` Mike Snitzer
2024-05-20 17:17 ` Mike Snitzer
2024-05-20 20:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-20 22:03 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2024-05-21 0:45 ` Mike Snitzer
2024-05-21 15:29 ` Mike Snitzer
2024-05-20 15:47 ` Mike Snitzer
2024-05-20 15:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZkvIn73jAqz94LjI@kernel.org \
--to=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).