From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: check bio alignment in blk_mq_submit_bio
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 16:02:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZnKQnQDTa6PNDWkL@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69d3bca7-0bdb-43cc-9181-a733ec495810@suse.de>
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 09:50:38AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 6/19/24 05:34, Ming Lei wrote:
> > IO logical block size is one fundamental queue limit, and every IO has
> > to be aligned with logical block size because our bio split can't deal
> > with unaligned bio.
> >
> > The check has to be done with queue usage counter grabbed because device
> > reconfiguration may change logical block size, and we can prevent the
> > reconfiguration from happening by holding queue usage counter.
> >
> > logical_block_size stays in the 1st cache line of queue_limits, and this
> > cache line is always fetched in fast path via bio_may_exceed_limits(),
> > so IO perf won't be affected by this check.
> >
> > Cc: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
> > Cc: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > block/blk-mq.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> >
> Is this still an issue after the atomic queue limits patchset from
> Christoph?
> One of the changes there is that we now always freeze the queue before
> changing any limits.
> So really this check should never trigger.
submit_bio() just blocks on queue freezing, and once queue is unfrozen,
submit_bio() still moves on, then unaligned bio is issued to
driver/hardware, please see:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/ZnDmXsFIPmPlT6Si@fedora/T/#m48c098e6d2df142da97ee3992b47d2b7e942a161
Thanks,
Ming
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-19 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-19 3:34 [PATCH] block: check bio alignment in blk_mq_submit_bio Ming Lei
2024-06-19 4:14 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-06-19 4:22 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-06-19 7:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-19 7:58 ` Ming Lei
2024-06-19 8:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-19 8:29 ` Ming Lei
2024-06-19 7:56 ` Ming Lei
2024-06-19 8:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-19 8:37 ` Ming Lei
2024-06-19 7:50 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-06-19 8:02 ` Ming Lei [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZnKQnQDTa6PNDWkL@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yebin10@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox