linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@quicinc.com>,
	Israel Rukshin <israelr@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] dm-inlinecrypt: add target for inline block device encryption
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 22:44:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zv-Ap9E2r1bRT2Wm@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241004004152.8845-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>

On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 05:41:52PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> 
> Add a new device-mapper target "dm-inlinecrypt" that is similar to
> dm-crypt but uses the blk-crypto API instead of the regular crypto API.
> This allows it to take advantage of inline encryption hardware such as
> that commonly built into UFS host controllers.
> 
> The table syntax matches dm-crypt's, but for now only a stripped-down
> set of parameters is supported.  For example, for now AES-256-XTS is the
> only supported cipher.

Maybe I'm stepping into a mine-field here, but if this simply uses
blk-crypto to accellerate a subset of dm-crypt, why isn't dm-crypt
simply enhanced to use blk-crypto when available?
compatible,

> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bio_crypt_set_ctx);

Please split the exports in a separate subsystem into a separate prep
patch, documenting why it makes sense to have these as exported APIs.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-04  5:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-04  0:41 [RFC PATCH] dm-inlinecrypt: add target for inline block device encryption Eric Biggers
2024-10-04  5:44 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-10-04 18:48   ` Eric Biggers
2024-10-04 19:21     ` Milan Broz
2024-10-07  5:45       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-07  8:25         ` Milan Broz
2024-10-08  9:20           ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-04 20:17 ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zv-Ap9E2r1bRT2Wm@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=israelr@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_mdalam@quicinc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).