From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
yangerkun@huawei.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] block: fix uaf for flush rq while iterating tags
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 11:11:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyreVTWn2no-WCC3@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <217f242b-b4e2-89f7-3b0f-3337c251a603@huaweicloud.com>
On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 10:58:40AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> Hi,Ming and Christoph
>
> 在 2024/11/05 19:19, Christoph Hellwig 写道:
> > On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 07:00:05PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> > > From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> > >
> > > blk_mq_clear_flush_rq_mapping() is not called during scsi probe, by
> > > checking blk_queue_init_done(). However, QUEUE_FLAG_INIT_DONE is cleared
> > > in del_gendisk by commit aec89dc5d421 ("block: keep q_usage_counter in
> > > atomic mode after del_gendisk"), hence for disk like scsi, following
> > > blk_mq_destroy_queue() will not clear flush rq from tags->rqs[] as well,
> > > cause following uaf that is found by our syzkaller for v6.6:
> >
> > Which means we leave the flush request lingering after del_gendisk,
> > which sounds like the real bug. I suspect we just need to move the
> > call to blk_mq_clear_flush_rq_mapping so that it is called from
> > del_gendisk and doesn't leave the flush tag lingering around.
> >
>
> This remind me that del_gendisk is still too late to do that. Noted that
> flush_rq can acquire different tags, so if the multiple flush_rq is done
> and those tags are not reused, the flush_rq can exist in multiple
> entries in tags->rqs[]. The consequence I can think of is that iterating
> tags can found the same flush_rq multiple times, and the flush_rq can be
> inflight.
How can that be one problem?
Please look at
commit 364b61818f65 ("blk-mq: clearing flush request reference in tags->rqs[]")
commit bd63141d585b ("blk-mq: clear stale request in tags->rq[] before freeing one request pool")
and understand the motivation.
That also means it is just fine to delay blk_mq_clear_flush_rq_mapping()
after disk is deleted.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-06 3:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-04 11:00 [PATCH -next] block: fix uaf for flush rq while iterating tags Yu Kuai
2024-11-05 7:18 ` Ming Lei
2024-11-05 7:36 ` Yu Kuai
2024-11-05 7:58 ` Ming Lei
2024-11-05 8:09 ` Yu Kuai
2024-11-19 1:30 ` Yu Kuai
2024-11-05 11:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-06 2:58 ` Yu Kuai
2024-11-06 3:11 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2024-11-06 3:25 ` Yu Kuai
2024-11-06 3:36 ` Ming Lei
2024-11-06 3:51 ` Yu Kuai
2024-11-06 3:58 ` Ming Lei
2024-11-19 1:32 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZyreVTWn2no-WCC3@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox