From: "Bao D. Nguyen" <quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 14/14] scsi: ufs: Inform the block layer about write ordering
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 07:58:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a0923b0c-ba96-e025-e063-59ba9f97678d@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250115224649.3973718-15-bvanassche@acm.org>
On 1/15/2025 2:46 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> This patch improves performance as follows on a test setup with UFSHCI
> 3.0 controller:
> - With the mq-deadline scheduler: 2.5x more IOPS for small writes.
> - When not using an I/O scheduler compared to using mq-deadline with
> zone locking: 4x more IOPS for small writes.
Hi Bart,
Wondering if the change has been tried on 4.x hosts and using different
IO schedulers? Any performance improvements?
Thanks, Bao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-16 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-15 22:46 [PATCH v17 00/14] Improve write performance for zoned UFS devices Bart Van Assche
2025-01-15 22:46 ` [PATCH v17 01/14] block: Support block drivers that preserve the order of write requests Bart Van Assche
2025-01-15 22:46 ` [PATCH v17 02/14] dm-linear: Report to the block layer that the write order is preserved Bart Van Assche
2025-01-17 18:04 ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-01-21 21:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-01-27 17:55 ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-01-15 22:46 ` [PATCH v17 03/14] block: Rework request allocation in blk_mq_submit_bio() Bart Van Assche
2025-01-15 22:46 ` [PATCH v17 04/14] block: Support allocating from a specific software queue Bart Van Assche
2025-01-15 22:46 ` [PATCH v17 05/14] blk-mq: Restore the zoned write order when requeuing Bart Van Assche
2025-01-15 22:46 ` [PATCH v17 06/14] blk-zoned: Track the write pointer per zone Bart Van Assche
2025-01-15 22:46 ` [PATCH v17 07/14] blk-zoned: Defer error handling Bart Van Assche
2025-01-15 22:46 ` [PATCH v17 08/14] blk-zoned: Add an argument to blk_zone_plug_bio() Bart Van Assche
2025-01-15 22:46 ` [PATCH v17 09/14] blk-zoned: Support pipelining of zoned writes Bart Van Assche
2025-01-15 22:46 ` [PATCH v17 10/14] scsi: core: Retry unaligned " Bart Van Assche
2025-01-15 22:46 ` [PATCH v17 11/14] scsi: sd: Increase retry count for " Bart Van Assche
2025-01-15 22:46 ` [PATCH v17 12/14] scsi: scsi_debug: Add the preserves_write_order module parameter Bart Van Assche
2025-01-15 22:46 ` [PATCH v17 13/14] scsi: scsi_debug: Support injecting unaligned write errors Bart Van Assche
2025-01-15 22:46 ` [PATCH v17 14/14] scsi: ufs: Inform the block layer about write ordering Bart Van Assche
2025-01-16 7:43 ` Can Guo
2025-01-16 15:58 ` Bao D. Nguyen [this message]
2025-01-23 0:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-01-17 22:47 ` [PATCH v17 00/14] Improve write performance for zoned UFS devices Damien Le Moal
2025-01-21 21:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-01-23 4:16 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-27 23:01 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a0923b0c-ba96-e025-e063-59ba9f97678d@quicinc.com \
--to=quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=quic_cang@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox