From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA6CC4332F for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 01:33:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231368AbiCCBeH (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2022 20:34:07 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53592 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231367AbiCCBeG (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2022 20:34:06 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-f179.google.com (mail-pl1-f179.google.com [209.85.214.179]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F76010BBDD; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 17:33:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-f179.google.com with SMTP id 9so3159129pll.6; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 17:33:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BiZJTNZEsMklspJa+9DnmRI3gUhB91fsCcqQjaHBUqU=; b=oINLnJeXz63oxo0yOgVyJUhVYUG7NZfEonISN8BTtJ+W6Dc9CXWxbswKRKoc2EjXgF o8i0E34iboblKRUNJqIPUZMOC8WxcePxjUnLrURnxh/oSsxzUPN2dkWsaD6n0an+X7tn wcUqH+IUFztFdCH/nPb48bDdaSe5jAwzFS9qYwJb+M4d9M9wY8zdmg9oX9rwe0b0H5R8 pH7HcKXn3hlm9jo/qQ2iFe9cNWtsXzrbirKwWJjHbtaqPAn6xwlVMnUmtA73TSTd1WXs Jvlvv8zOlcyk/RHhiI1jIE6br8dYtQEyBoJIj8N0JMRoMq/WsT+TA6WC+Qgh7cCqK6kl k09A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531qwk4W72N9Zt8vYy9n3TpL1PRaeASY4ecYUBYz3YegfEoHbH6X pVl8rzpR60RGmCrwmaPvL3E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzYj+eHJE9/i13BDviH4uxYQG5wmLdgUQS7pue0aUcr2r9RiI03XSjJ3zZoSf55TMAquNncAg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:11c6:b0:151:a247:31eb with SMTP id q6-20020a17090311c600b00151a24731ebmr3415425plh.91.1646271200872; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 17:33:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2601:647:4000:d7:feaa:14ff:fe9d:6dbd? ([2601:647:4000:d7:feaa:14ff:fe9d:6dbd]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id cv15-20020a17090afd0f00b001bedcbca1a9sm6066368pjb.57.2022.03.02.17.33.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Mar 2022 17:33:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 17:33:18 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1 Subject: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF BoF] BoF for Zoned Storage Content-Language: en-US To: Luis Chamberlain , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Matias_Bj=c3=b8rling?= , =?UTF-8?Q?Javier_Gonz=c3=a1lez?= , Damien Le Moal , Adam Manzanares , Keith Busch , Johannes Thumshirn , Naohiro Aota , Pankaj Raghav , Kanchan Joshi , Nitesh Shetty References: From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On 3/2/22 16:56, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > Thinking proactively about LSFMM, regarding just Zone storage.. > > I'd like to propose a BoF for Zoned Storage. The point of it is > to address the existing point points we have and take advantage of > having folks in the room we can likely settle on things faster which > otherwise would take years. > > I'll throw at least one topic out: > > * Raw access for zone append for microbenchmarks: > - are we really happy with the status quo? > - if not what outlets do we have? > > I think the nvme passthrogh stuff deserves it's own shared > discussion though and should not make it part of the BoF. Since I'm working on zoned storage I'd like to participate. Thanks, Bart.