From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>, hch@lst.de, yukuai3@huawei.com
Cc: penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
yangerkun@huawei.com, johnny.chenyi@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] brd: fix sleeping function called from invalid context in brd_insert_page()
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 09:28:28 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a2dc2566-44e1-4460-bbff-bb813f4655d9@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eb41cab3-5946-4fe3-a1be-843dd6fca159@kernel.dk>
On 6/30/25 9:24 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 6/30/25 5:28 AM, Yu Kuai wrote:
>> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
>>
>> __xa_cmpxchg() is called with rcu_read_lock(), and it will allocate
>> memory if necessary.
>>
>> Fix the problem by moving rcu_read_lock() after __xa_cmpxchg(), meanwhile,
>> it still should be held before xa_unlock(), prevent returned page to be
>> freed by concurrent discard.
>
> The rcu locking in there is a bit of a mess, imho. What _exactly_ is the
> rcu read side locking protecting? Is it only needed around the lookup
> and insert? We even hold it over the kmap and copy, which seems very
> heavy handed.
Gah it's holding the page alive too. Can't we just grab a ref to the
page when inserting it, and drop that at free time? It would be a lot
better to have only the lookup be RCU protected, having the full
copies under it seems kind of crazy.
IOW, I think there's room for some good cleanups here.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-30 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-30 11:28 [PATCH v2] brd: fix sleeping function called from invalid context in brd_insert_page() Yu Kuai
2025-06-30 15:24 ` Jens Axboe
2025-06-30 15:28 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2025-07-01 1:28 ` Yu Kuai
2025-07-01 3:00 ` Jens Axboe
2025-07-01 7:38 ` Yu Kuai
2025-07-01 14:01 ` Jens Axboe
2025-07-01 14:14 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a2dc2566-44e1-4460-bbff-bb813f4655d9@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=johnny.chenyi@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox