linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] dm-integrity: use the nop integrity profile
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 16:52:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a5570194-920c-45d8-98d5-da99db0d2f8d@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240605063031.3286655-2-hch@lst.de>

On 6/5/24 8:28 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Use the block layer built-in nop profile instead of reinventing it.

As this is my "invention", I am pretty sure that "nop" profile was
not available at the time I was prototyping AEAD dmcrypt extension.
(It was months before we submitted it upstream - and then nobody
apparently fixed it.)

So, I am quite happy this hack can go away!

I run full cryptsetup testuite with this patch and everything
works, nice cleanup.

Reviewed-by: Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>

Thanks,
Milan

> 
> Tested by:
> 
> $ dd if=/dev/urandom of=key.bin bs=512 count=1
> 
> $ cryptsetup luksFormat -q --type luks2 --integrity hmac-sha256 \
>   	--integrity-no-wipe /dev/nvme0n1 key.bin
> $ cryptsetup luksOpen /dev/nvme0n1 luks-integrity --key-file key.bin
> 
> and then doing mkfs.xfs and simple I/O on the mount file system.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>   drivers/md/dm-crypt.c     |  4 ++--
>   drivers/md/dm-integrity.c | 20 --------------------
>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c b/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c
> index 1b7a97cc377943..1dfc462f29cd6f 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c
> @@ -1176,8 +1176,8 @@ static int crypt_integrity_ctr(struct crypt_config *cc, struct dm_target *ti)
>   	struct blk_integrity *bi = blk_get_integrity(cc->dev->bdev->bd_disk);
>   	struct mapped_device *md = dm_table_get_md(ti->table);
>   
> -	/* From now we require underlying device with our integrity profile */
> -	if (!bi || strcasecmp(bi->profile->name, "DM-DIF-EXT-TAG")) {
> +	/* We require an underlying device with non-PI metadata */
> +	if (!bi || strcmp(bi->profile->name, "nop")) {
>   		ti->error = "Integrity profile not supported.";
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   	}
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c b/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
> index 417fddebe367a2..c1cc27541673c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
> @@ -350,25 +350,6 @@ static struct kmem_cache *journal_io_cache;
>   #define DEBUG_bytes(bytes, len, msg, ...)	do { } while (0)
>   #endif
>   
> -static void dm_integrity_prepare(struct request *rq)
> -{
> -}
> -
> -static void dm_integrity_complete(struct request *rq, unsigned int nr_bytes)
> -{
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * DM Integrity profile, protection is performed layer above (dm-crypt)
> - */
> -static const struct blk_integrity_profile dm_integrity_profile = {
> -	.name			= "DM-DIF-EXT-TAG",
> -	.generate_fn		= NULL,
> -	.verify_fn		= NULL,
> -	.prepare_fn		= dm_integrity_prepare,
> -	.complete_fn		= dm_integrity_complete,
> -};
> -
>   static void dm_integrity_map_continue(struct dm_integrity_io *dio, bool from_map);
>   static void integrity_bio_wait(struct work_struct *w);
>   static void dm_integrity_dtr(struct dm_target *ti);
> @@ -3656,7 +3637,6 @@ static void dm_integrity_set(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_integrity_c *ic)
>   	struct blk_integrity bi;
>   
>   	memset(&bi, 0, sizeof(bi));
> -	bi.profile = &dm_integrity_profile;
>   	bi.tuple_size = ic->tag_size;
>   	bi.tag_size = bi.tuple_size;
>   	bi.interval_exp = ic->sb->log2_sectors_per_block + SECTOR_SHIFT;


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-05 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-05  6:28 move integrity settings to queue_limits Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05  6:28 ` [PATCH 01/12] dm-integrity: use the nop integrity profile Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 14:52   ` Milan Broz [this message]
2024-06-06  4:45     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-06  0:12   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-06-05  6:28 ` [PATCH 02/12] block: remove the unused BIP_{CTRL,DISK}_NOCHECK flags Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 16:16   ` Bart Van Assche
2024-06-05 23:31   ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-06-06  0:13   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-06-05  6:28 ` [PATCH 03/12] block: remove the BIP_IP_CHECKSUM flag Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 16:21   ` Bart Van Assche
2024-06-05 23:31   ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-06-06  0:14   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-06-05  6:28 ` [PATCH 04/12] block: remove the blk_integrity_profile structure Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 14:35   ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-06-06  4:49     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 16:31   ` Bart Van Assche
2024-06-06  4:50     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-06 15:38       ` Bart Van Assche
2024-06-05  6:28 ` [PATCH 05/12] block: remove the blk_flush_integrity call in blk_integrity_unregister Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05  6:28 ` [PATCH 06/12] block: factor out flag_{store,show} helper for integrity Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 16:00   ` Keith Busch
2024-06-06  0:16   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-06-05  6:28 ` [PATCH 07/12] block: use kstrtoul in flag_store Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 16:00   ` Keith Busch
2024-06-06  0:16   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-06-05  6:28 ` [PATCH 08/12] block: don't pretend to generate/verify for non-PI metadata Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05  6:28 ` [PATCH 09/12] block: don't require stable pages " Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05  6:28 ` [PATCH 10/12] block: bypass the STABLE_WRITES flag for protection information Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05  6:28 ` [PATCH 11/12] block: invert the BLK_INTEGRITY_{GENERATE,VERIFY} flags Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-06  0:20   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-06-05  6:28 ` [PATCH 12/12] block: move integrity information into queue_limits Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 16:56   ` Bart Van Assche
2024-06-06  4:51     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a5570194-920c-45d8-98d5-da99db0d2f8d@gmail.com \
    --to=gmazyland@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).