linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Cc: Linux Block Layer Mailinglist <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: respect virtual boundary mask in bvecs
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 06:53:16 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a97f3d77-d23b-b418-abce-2d93ed725bdb@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181105102301.9752-1-jthumshirn@suse.de>

On 11/5/18 2:23 AM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static inline bool biovec_phys_mergeable(struct request_queue *q,
>   static inline bool __bvec_gap_to_prev(struct request_queue *q,
>   		struct bio_vec *bprv, unsigned int offset)
>   {
> -	return offset ||
> +	return (offset & queue_virt_boundary(q)) ||
>   		((bprv->bv_offset + bprv->bv_len) & queue_virt_boundary(q));
>   }

How about changing that expression into the following to make it easier 
for the compiler to optimize this code?

(offset | (bprv->bv_offset + bprv->bv_len)) & queue_virt_boundary(q)

Thanks,

Bart.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-11-07  0:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-05 10:23 [PATCH] block: respect virtual boundary mask in bvecs Johannes Thumshirn
2018-11-05 10:55 ` Ming Lei
2018-11-05 11:50   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-11-05 12:01     ` Ming Lei
2018-11-06 12:34       ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-11-06 14:56         ` Ming Lei
2018-11-06 15:14           ` Keith Busch
2018-11-07  3:14           ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-11-07  3:11         ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-11-06 14:31 ` Keith Busch
2018-11-06 14:53 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2018-11-06 14:56   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-11-07  3:30     ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-11-07 16:10       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-08 15:04         ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a97f3d77-d23b-b418-abce-2d93ed725bdb@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).