From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] ublk: factor out ublk_start_io() helper
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 21:05:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aA4rqcpC01SzUn_g@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250427045803.772972-6-csander@purestorage.com>
On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 10:58:00PM -0600, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
> In preparation for calling it from outside ublk_dispatch_req(), factor
> out the code responsible for setting up an incoming ublk I/O request.
>
> Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> index 01fc92051754..90a38a82f8cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> @@ -1151,17 +1151,44 @@ static inline void __ublk_abort_rq(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
> blk_mq_requeue_request(rq, false);
> else
> blk_mq_end_request(rq, BLK_STS_IOERR);
> }
>
> +static void ublk_start_io(struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct request *req,
> + struct ublk_io *io)
> +{
> + unsigned mapped_bytes = ublk_map_io(ubq, req, io);
> +
> + /* partially mapped, update io descriptor */
> + if (unlikely(mapped_bytes != blk_rq_bytes(req))) {
> + /*
> + * Nothing mapped, retry until we succeed.
> + *
> + * We may never succeed in mapping any bytes here because
> + * of OOM. TODO: reserve one buffer with single page pinned
> + * for providing forward progress guarantee.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(!mapped_bytes)) {
> + blk_mq_requeue_request(req, false);
> + blk_mq_delay_kick_requeue_list(req->q,
> + UBLK_REQUEUE_DELAY_MS);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + ublk_get_iod(ubq, req->tag)->nr_sectors =
> + mapped_bytes >> 9;
> + }
> +
> + ublk_init_req_ref(ubq, req);
> +}
> +
> static void ublk_dispatch_req(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
> struct request *req,
> unsigned int issue_flags)
> {
> int tag = req->tag;
> struct ublk_io *io = &ubq->ios[tag];
> - unsigned int mapped_bytes;
>
> pr_devel("%s: complete: qid %d tag %d io_flags %x addr %llx\n",
> __func__, ubq->q_id, req->tag, io->flags,
> ublk_get_iod(ubq, req->tag)->addr);
>
> @@ -1204,33 +1231,11 @@ static void ublk_dispatch_req(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
> pr_devel("%s: update iod->addr: qid %d tag %d io_flags %x addr %llx\n",
> __func__, ubq->q_id, req->tag, io->flags,
> ublk_get_iod(ubq, req->tag)->addr);
> }
>
> - mapped_bytes = ublk_map_io(ubq, req, io);
> -
> - /* partially mapped, update io descriptor */
> - if (unlikely(mapped_bytes != blk_rq_bytes(req))) {
> - /*
> - * Nothing mapped, retry until we succeed.
> - *
> - * We may never succeed in mapping any bytes here because
> - * of OOM. TODO: reserve one buffer with single page pinned
> - * for providing forward progress guarantee.
> - */
> - if (unlikely(!mapped_bytes)) {
> - blk_mq_requeue_request(req, false);
> - blk_mq_delay_kick_requeue_list(req->q,
> - UBLK_REQUEUE_DELAY_MS);
> - return;
> - }
Here it needs to break ublk_dispatch_req() for not completing the
uring_cmd, however ublk_start_io() can't support it.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-27 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-27 4:57 [PATCH 0/8] ublk: simplify NEED_GET_DATA handling and request lookup Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 4:57 ` [PATCH 1/8] ublk: factor out ublk_commit_and_fetch Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 4:57 ` [PATCH 2/8] ublk: fix "immepdately" typo in comment Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 12:58 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-27 4:57 ` [PATCH 3/8] ublk: remove misleading "ubq" in "ubq_complete_io_cmd()" Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 13:01 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-27 4:57 ` [PATCH 4/8] ublk: don't log uring_cmd cmd_op in ublk_dispatch_req() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 13:03 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-27 4:58 ` [PATCH 5/8] ublk: factor out ublk_start_io() helper Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 13:05 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-04-28 14:28 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-28 15:12 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-29 4:05 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-29 14:55 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-30 22:44 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 4:58 ` [PATCH 6/8] ublk: don't call ublk_dispatch_req() for NEED_GET_DATA Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 13:10 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-27 4:58 ` [PATCH 7/8] ublk: check UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV in ublk_abort_queue() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 13:13 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-27 4:58 ` [PATCH 8/8] ublk: store request pointer in ublk_io Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 13:25 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aA4rqcpC01SzUn_g@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox