From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E40FC14D2B7 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 14:06:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745503603; cv=none; b=D7QxYaKfe9sP4QUo2g3/LWxE/+joSSr1/mJOS4c7+HWaFjXKxjtXD6jDWlgW6PmDAY4xH6KH72YLoDiYJhqvJQKzd4yJ/u34v2d1c+znQeaBjA87KMUyfUtGTg2nC8Utf8EgzQlAibz9ebrlbuwsRgdIyMycspunnjTBmn5Jmbk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745503603; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5VD01WU9inVJwLJKeq8ptRnrdXy9Jbf+Rgp9NQqupAA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=AT9Lpezn4saFTgwbk5iQrzw5v1WHZUhNrc/fByFpGM/u1rsVQAHzDq/fqAXb6jZegJH3hAJ4sJnsfAERbHuDcK/kPRGksgnaxBnPZaqf1I3XZqgwLDuWutMzMyl/kov+9RsRCYElAapPIxuEOxJGFcer09K43QqVf4jJCHklIn4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=OIF9YuUo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="OIF9YuUo" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=YS9w0dHX3JifpWxDrVyfxSBsFp7DSMrJJqHMEsXVY2k=; b=OIF9YuUoRWArcUY8r+B+M88EgT F+ZCZo+N7EeqGXxtisWCPL5VXzGY984sIx5k/UH4dTGnesZz5yzNTgzKB53x261V8pMdhtdagBj18 WV0rf5EtgsO+hbpXkj1830Ox8Z5FH1Wo6mjgn9G5XCrB7hZ+jL6K59y33ipo7jwFn3hBe6ps6wC8l jWgnTXTvghvHBMTrgnJsyzvXo2GWXUY3z+8k9y5HVdNFxir7Vz1QxI7JW8WzKcHSlVsRrzX26Pqdw W+nozLF6mODqHczXDqCwYrfoxQDPLReNknp8trfZ6EHlz1BORp5fdTYH9SLp7TzL8OVTmV9MuAi1i QYLpkKBg==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1u7xDt-0000000EJgA-1rga; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 14:06:41 +0000 Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 07:06:41 -0700 From: "hch@infradead.org" To: Sean Anderson Cc: Shinichiro Kawasaki , "hch@infradead.org" , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests] zbd/005: Limit block size to zone length Message-ID: References: <20250423164957.2293594-1-seanga2@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 09:56:11AM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote: > > As a similar idea, how about to skip the test case if the test target device's > > zone size is too small? > > Why would I want that? The test passes with an appropriate block size. Because this is a completely stupid device that can't actually be used by any file system or storage system designed for zones. Why would we make a mess of our tests for a highschool science fair project?