From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
"Shinichiro Kawasaki" <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 08/20] block: don't allow to switch elevator if updating nr_hw_queues is in-progress
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 10:43:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBA84hnKcddOff4W@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab875b11-9591-4034-bb11-ed8a35454a75@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 09:47:02PM +0530, Nilay Shroff wrote:
>
>
> On 4/27/25 7:57 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 06:18:33PM +0530, Nilay Shroff wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 4/24/25 8:51 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> >>> Elevator switch code is another `nr_hw_queue` reader in non-fast-IO code
> >>> path, so it can't be done if updating `nr_hw_queues` is in-progress.
> >>>
> >>> Take same approach with not allowing add/del disk when updating
> >>> nr_hw_queues is in-progress, by grabbing read lock of
> >>> set->update_nr_hwq_sema.
> >>>
> >>> Take the nested variant for avoiding the following false positive
> >>> splat[1], and this way is correct because:
> >>>
> >>> - the read lock in elv_iosched_store() is not overlapped with the read lock
> >>> in adding/deleting disk:
> >>>
> >>> - kobject attribute is only available after the kobject is added and
> >>> before it is deleted
> >>>
> >>> -> #4 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue){++++}-{0:0}:
> >>> -> #3 (&q->limits_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
> >>> -> #2 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
> >>> -> #1 (&set->update_nr_hwq_lock){.+.+}-{4:4}:
> >>> -> #0 (kn->active#103){++++}-{0:0}:
> >>>
> >>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/aAWv3NPtNIKKvJZc@fedora/ [1]
> >>> Reported-by: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
> >>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/mz4t4tlwiqjijw3zvqnjb7ovvvaegkqganegmmlc567tt5xj67@xal5ro544cnc/
> >>> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> block/elevator.c | 3 +++
> >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/block/elevator.c b/block/elevator.c
> >>> index 4400eb8fe54f..56da6ab7691a 100644
> >>> --- a/block/elevator.c
> >>> +++ b/block/elevator.c
> >>> @@ -723,6 +723,7 @@ ssize_t elv_iosched_store(struct gendisk *disk, const char *buf,
> >>> int ret;
> >>> unsigned int memflags;
> >>> struct request_queue *q = disk->queue;
> >>> + struct blk_mq_tag_set *set = q->tag_set;
> >>>
> >>> /*
> >>> * If the attribute needs to load a module, do it before freezing the
> >>> @@ -734,6 +735,7 @@ ssize_t elv_iosched_store(struct gendisk *disk, const char *buf,
> >>>
> >>> elv_iosched_load_module(name);
> >>>
> >>> + down_read_nested(&set->update_nr_hwq_sema, 1);
> >>
> >> Why do we need to add nested read lock here? The lockdep splat[1] which
> >> you reported earlier is possibly due to the same reader lock being acquired
> >> recursively in elv_iosched_store and then elevator_change?
> >
> > The splat isn't related with the nested read lock.
> >
> > If you replace down_read_nested() with down_read(), the same splat can be
> > triggered again when running `blktests block/001`.
> >
> I couldn't recreate it on my setup using above blktests.
It is reproduced in my test vm every time after killing the nested variant:
[ 74.257200] ======================================================
[ 74.259369] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 74.260772] 6.15.0-rc3_ublk+ #547 Not tainted
[ 74.261950] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 74.263281] check/5077 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 74.264492] ffff888105f1fd18 (kn->active#119){++++}-{0:0}, at: __kernfs_remove+0x213/0x680
[ 74.266006]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 74.267998] ffff88828a661e20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#14){++++}-{0:0}, at: del_gendisk+0xe5/0x180
[ 74.269631]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 74.272645]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 74.274804]
-> #3 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#14){++++}-{0:0}:
[ 74.277009] blk_queue_enter+0x4c2/0x630
[ 74.278218] blk_mq_alloc_request+0x479/0xa00
[ 74.279539] scsi_execute_cmd+0x151/0xba0
[ 74.281078] sr_check_events+0x1bc/0xa40
[ 74.283012] cdrom_check_events+0x5c/0x120
[ 74.284892] disk_check_events+0xbe/0x390
[ 74.286181] disk_check_media_change+0xf1/0x220
[ 74.287455] sr_block_open+0xce/0x230
[ 74.288528] blkdev_get_whole+0x8d/0x200
[ 74.289702] bdev_open+0x614/0xc60
[ 74.290882] blkdev_open+0x1f6/0x360
[ 74.292215] do_dentry_open+0x491/0x1820
[ 74.293309] vfs_open+0x7a/0x440
[ 74.294384] path_openat+0x1b7e/0x2ce0
[ 74.295507] do_filp_open+0x1c5/0x450
[ 74.296616] do_sys_openat2+0xef/0x180
[ 74.297667] __x64_sys_openat+0x10e/0x210
[ 74.298768] do_syscall_64+0x92/0x180
[ 74.299800] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[ 74.300971]
-> #2 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
[ 74.302700] __mutex_lock+0x19c/0x1990
[ 74.303682] bdev_open+0x6cd/0xc60
[ 74.304613] bdev_file_open_by_dev+0xc4/0x140
[ 74.306008] disk_scan_partitions+0x191/0x290
[ 74.307716] __add_disk_fwnode+0xd2a/0x1140
[ 74.309394] add_disk_fwnode+0x10e/0x220
[ 74.311039] nvme_alloc_ns+0x1833/0x2c30
[ 74.312669] nvme_scan_ns+0x5a0/0x6f0
[ 74.314151] async_run_entry_fn+0x94/0x540
[ 74.315719] process_one_work+0x86a/0x14a0
[ 74.317287] worker_thread+0x5bb/0xf90
[ 74.318228] kthread+0x371/0x720
[ 74.319085] ret_from_fork+0x31/0x70
[ 74.319941] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[ 74.320808]
-> #1 (&set->update_nr_hwq_sema){.+.+}-{4:4}:
[ 74.322311] down_read+0x8e/0x470
[ 74.323135] elv_iosched_store+0x17a/0x210
[ 74.324036] queue_attr_store+0x234/0x340
[ 74.324881] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x39b/0x5a0
[ 74.325771] vfs_write+0x5df/0xec0
[ 74.326514] ksys_write+0xff/0x200
[ 74.327262] do_syscall_64+0x92/0x180
[ 74.328018] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[ 74.328963]
-> #0 (kn->active#119){++++}-{0:0}:
[ 74.330433] __lock_acquire+0x145f/0x2260
[ 74.331329] lock_acquire+0x163/0x300
[ 74.332221] kernfs_drain+0x39d/0x450
[ 74.333002] __kernfs_remove+0x213/0x680
[ 74.333792] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0xa2/0x100
[ 74.334589] remove_files+0x8d/0x1b0
[ 74.335326] sysfs_remove_group+0x7c/0x160
[ 74.336118] sysfs_remove_groups+0x55/0xb0
[ 74.336869] __kobject_del+0x7d/0x1d0
[ 74.337637] kobject_del+0x38/0x60
[ 74.338340] blk_unregister_queue+0x153/0x2c0
[ 74.339125] __del_gendisk+0x252/0x9d0
[ 74.339959] del_gendisk+0xe5/0x180
[ 74.340756] sr_remove+0x7b/0xd0
[ 74.341429] device_release_driver_internal+0x36d/0x520
[ 74.342353] bus_remove_device+0x1ef/0x3f0
[ 74.343172] device_del+0x3be/0x9b0
[ 74.343951] __scsi_remove_device+0x27f/0x340
[ 74.344724] sdev_store_delete+0x87/0x120
[ 74.345508] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x39b/0x5a0
[ 74.346287] vfs_write+0x5df/0xec0
[ 74.347170] ksys_write+0xff/0x200
[ 74.348312] do_syscall_64+0x92/0x180
[ 74.349519] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[ 74.350797]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 74.353554] Chain exists of:
kn->active#119 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &q->q_usage_counter(queue)#14
[ 74.355535] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 74.356650] CPU0 CPU1
[ 74.357328] ---- ----
[ 74.358026] lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#14);
[ 74.358749] lock(&disk->open_mutex);
[ 74.359561] lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#14);
[ 74.360488] lock(kn->active#119);
[ 74.361113]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ 74.362574] 6 locks held by check/5077:
[ 74.363193] #0: ffff888114640420 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0xff/0x200
[ 74.364274] #1: ffff88829abb6088 (&of->mutex#2){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x25b/0x5a0
[ 74.365937] #2: ffff8881176ca0e0 (&shost->scan_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: sdev_store_delete+0x7f/0x120
[ 74.367643] #3: ffff88828521c380 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x90/0x520
[ 74.369464] #4: ffff8881176ca380 (&set->update_nr_hwq_sema){.+.+}-{4:4}, at: del_gendisk+0xdd/0x180
[ 74.370961] #5: ffff88828a661e20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#14){++++}-{0:0}, at: del_gendisk+0xe5/0x180
[ 74.372050]
stack backtrace:
[ 74.373111] CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 5077 Comm: check Not tainted 6.15.0-rc3_ublk+ #547 PREEMPT(voluntary)
[ 74.373116] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014
[ 74.373118] Call Trace:
[ 74.373121] <TASK>
[ 74.373123] dump_stack_lvl+0x84/0xd0
[ 74.373129] print_circular_bug.cold+0x185/0x1d0
[ 74.373134] check_noncircular+0x14a/0x170
[ 74.373140] __lock_acquire+0x145f/0x2260
[ 74.373145] lock_acquire+0x163/0x300
[ 74.373149] ? __kernfs_remove+0x213/0x680
[ 74.373155] kernfs_drain+0x39d/0x450
[ 74.373158] ? __kernfs_remove+0x213/0x680
[ 74.373161] ? __pfx_kernfs_drain+0x10/0x10
[ 74.373165] ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
[ 74.373168] ? kernfs_root+0xb0/0x1c0
[ 74.373173] __kernfs_remove+0x213/0x680
[ 74.373176] ? kernfs_find_ns+0x197/0x390
[ 74.373183] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0xa2/0x100
[ 74.373186] remove_files+0x8d/0x1b0
[ 74.373191] sysfs_remove_group+0x7c/0x160
[ 74.373194] sysfs_remove_groups+0x55/0xb0
[ 74.373198] __kobject_del+0x7d/0x1d0
[ 74.373203] kobject_del+0x38/0x60
[ 74.373206] blk_unregister_queue+0x153/0x2c0
[ 74.373210] __del_gendisk+0x252/0x9d0
[ 74.373214] ? down_read+0x1a7/0x470
[ 74.373218] ? __pfx___del_gendisk+0x10/0x10
[ 74.373221] ? __pfx_down_read+0x10/0x10
[ 74.373224] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xdb/0x190
[ 74.373227] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x18/0x150
[ 74.373231] del_gendisk+0xe5/0x180
[ 74.373235] sr_remove+0x7b/0xd0
[ 74.373239] device_release_driver_internal+0x36d/0x520
[ 74.373243] ? kobject_put+0x5e/0x4a0
[ 74.373246] bus_remove_device+0x1ef/0x3f0
[ 74.373250] device_del+0x3be/0x9b0
[ 74.373254] ? attribute_container_device_trigger+0x181/0x1f0
[ 74.373257] ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10
[ 74.373260] ? __pfx_attribute_container_device_trigger+0x10/0x10
[ 74.373264] __scsi_remove_device+0x27f/0x340
[ 74.373267] sdev_store_delete+0x87/0x120
[ 74.373270] ? __pfx_sysfs_kf_write+0x10/0x10
[ 74.373273] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x39b/0x5a0
[ 74.373276] ? __pfx_kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x10/0x10
[ 74.373278] vfs_write+0x5df/0xec0
[ 74.373282] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x18/0x150
[ 74.373285] ? __pfx_vfs_write+0x10/0x10
[ 74.373291] ksys_write+0xff/0x200
[ 74.373295] ? __pfx_ksys_write+0x10/0x10
[ 74.373298] ? fput_close_sync+0xd6/0x160
[ 74.373303] do_syscall_64+0x92/0x180
[ 74.373309] ? trace_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x101/0x150
[ 74.373313] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xdb/0x190
[ 74.373317] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x97/0x290
[ 74.373322] ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
[ 74.373330] ? fput_close+0xd6/0x160
[ 74.373333] ? __pfx_fput_close+0x10/0x10
[ 74.373338] ? filp_close+0x25/0x40
[ 74.373341] ? do_dup2+0x287/0x4f0
[ 74.373346] ? trace_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x101/0x150
[ 74.373348] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xdb/0x190
[ 74.373351] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x97/0x290
[ 74.373353] ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
[ 74.373357] ? trace_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x101/0x150
[ 74.373359] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xdb/0x190
[ 74.373362] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x97/0x290
[ 74.373364] ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
[ 74.373368] ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
[ 74.373371] ? trace_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x101/0x150
[ 74.373373] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xdb/0x190
[ 74.373376] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x97/0x290
[ 74.373379] ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
[ 74.373382] ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
[ 74.373385] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x35/0x90
[ 74.373388] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x35/0x90
[ 74.373390] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x35/0x90
[ 74.373393] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[ 74.373396] RIP: 0033:0x7fa3873a8756
[ 74.373409] Code: 5d e8 41 8b 93 08 03 00 00 59 5e 48 83 f8 fc 75 19 83 e2 39 83 fa 08 75 11 e8 26 ff ff ff 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 45 10 0f 05 <48> 8b 5d f8 c9 c3 0f 1f 40 00 f3 0f 1e fa 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 08
[ 74.373412] RSP: 002b:00007ffede0285d0 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
[ 74.373416] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 00007fa3873a8756
[ 74.373418] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 000056557b3dc7d0 RDI: 0000000000000001
[ 74.373420] RBP: 00007ffede0285f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 74.373421] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000002
[ 74.373423] R13: 000056557b3dc7d0 R14: 00007fa3875245c0 R15: 0000000000000000
[ 74.373428] </TASK>
>
> >>
> >> On another note, if we suspect possible one-depth recursion for the same
> >> class of lock then then we should use SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING (instead of using
> >> 1 here) for subclass. But still I am not clear why this lock needs nesting.
> >
> > It is just one false positive, because elv_iosched_store() won't happen
> > when adding disk.
> >
> Yes, but how could we avoid false positive? It's probably because of commit
> ffa1e7ada456 ("block: Make request_queue lockdep splats show up earlier"). How about adding manual dependency of fs-reclaim on freeze-lock after we add
> the disk. Currently that manual dependency is added in blk_alloc_queue.
Please see the above trace, which isn't related with commit ffa1e7ada456,
and the lock chain doesn't include 'fs_reclaim' at all.
commit ffa1e7ada456 isn't wrong too, which just helps us to expose deadlock
risk early.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-29 2:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-24 15:21 [PATCH V3 00/20] block: unify elevator changing and fix lockdep warning Ming Lei
2025-04-24 15:21 ` [PATCH V3 01/20] block: move blk_mq_add_queue_tag_set() after blk_mq_map_swqueue() Ming Lei
2025-04-24 15:21 ` [PATCH V3 02/20] block: move ELEVATOR_FLAG_DISABLE_WBT a request queue flag Ming Lei
2025-04-25 14:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-24 15:21 ` [PATCH V3 03/20] block: don't call freeze queue in elevator_switch() and elevator_disable() Ming Lei
2025-04-25 14:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-24 15:21 ` [PATCH V3 04/20] block: use q->elevator with ->elevator_lock held in elv_iosched_show() Ming Lei
2025-04-25 6:08 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-25 10:53 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-25 14:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-24 15:21 ` [PATCH V3 05/20] block: add two helpers for registering/un-registering sched debugfs Ming Lei
2025-04-24 15:21 ` [PATCH V3 06/20] block: move sched debugfs register into elvevator_register_queue Ming Lei
2025-04-24 15:21 ` [PATCH V3 07/20] block: prevent adding/deleting disk during updating nr_hw_queues Ming Lei
2025-04-25 6:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-25 11:37 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-25 14:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-25 16:46 ` kernel test robot
2025-04-24 15:21 ` [PATCH V3 08/20] block: don't allow to switch elevator if updating nr_hw_queues is in-progress Ming Lei
2025-04-25 6:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-25 12:48 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-27 2:27 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-28 16:17 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-29 2:43 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-04-29 10:22 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-30 0:54 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-24 15:21 ` [PATCH V3 09/20] block: simplify elevator reattachment for updating nr_hw_queues Ming Lei
2025-04-25 6:34 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-25 18:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-29 9:51 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-24 15:21 ` [PATCH V3 10/20] block: move blk_unregister_queue() & device_del() after freeze wait Ming Lei
2025-04-25 6:35 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-25 12:50 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-25 14:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-28 11:51 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-24 15:21 ` [PATCH V3 11/20] block: move queue freezing & elevator_lock into elevator_change() Ming Lei
2025-04-25 6:36 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-25 12:54 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-25 14:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-24 15:21 ` [PATCH V3 12/20] block: add `struct elv_change_ctx` for unifying elevator change Ming Lei
2025-04-25 6:38 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-25 18:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-29 15:45 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-24 15:21 ` [PATCH V3 13/20] block: " Ming Lei
2025-04-25 6:39 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-25 13:03 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-30 0:46 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-25 18:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-24 15:21 ` [PATCH V3 14/20] block: pass elevator_queue to elv_register_queue & unregister_queue Ming Lei
2025-04-25 6:40 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-24 15:21 ` [PATCH V3 15/20] block: fail to show/store elevator sysfs attribute if elevator is dying Ming Lei
2025-04-25 6:45 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-25 18:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-30 1:07 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-24 15:21 ` [PATCH V3 16/20] block: move elv_register[unregister]_queue out of elevator_lock Ming Lei
2025-04-25 6:46 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-25 13:05 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-25 18:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-24 15:21 ` [PATCH V3 17/20] block: move debugfs/sysfs register out of freezing queue Ming Lei
2025-04-25 6:47 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-25 18:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-28 11:28 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-24 15:21 ` [PATCH V3 18/20] block: remove several ->elevator_lock Ming Lei
2025-04-25 6:48 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-25 18:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-24 15:21 ` [PATCH V3 19/20] block: move hctx cpuhp add/del out of queue freezing Ming Lei
2025-04-25 6:49 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-24 15:21 ` [PATCH V3 20/20] block: move wbt_enable_default() out of queue freezing from sched ->exit() Ming Lei
2025-04-25 13:10 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-29 10:59 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-29 12:00 ` [PATCH V3 00/20] block: unify elevator changing and fix lockdep warning Stefan Haberland
2025-04-29 12:11 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aBA84hnKcddOff4W@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox