From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E514221B9D8 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749481492; cv=none; b=ubZjf3KrJldakEw9dZk/pzv8h4NYH6ad74lAVk5DrHZp8DXFZpjPAaVztpFAmR7QSuHE1tlxz0cvuWKBMdxW4tAmauZT8WbOl42aq6rp14MNgz8VCbuvy4eu6S2687egwYQf/VGfn5xxWkNfauKcNQw+pV4WOf9UNdQaVTTCzpY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749481492; c=relaxed/simple; bh=V9R/MlXkDxF8BcfPqNzbvEqrs6zAbVcZgELa1g9IE3k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=RbnWVUfBYbBociphflJGMu7+J3RWaBc+jpd4WQal1inXrvsLmiHQnHV0+yFWA8UhUFIko/5Y8ShgkyUAkrHd7nB/GR8TLkXeZ2w3cVNO19aM6pMCK4Xvy+WPdPZgv2u5e86TEBjiOVkMUCy7Sv5+pJYPzdtUQlU9/ugyqUM4Cz8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=JSL/Vd3w; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="JSL/Vd3w" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 446D8C4CEEB; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:04:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1749481491; bh=V9R/MlXkDxF8BcfPqNzbvEqrs6zAbVcZgELa1g9IE3k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=JSL/Vd3wCBE2pYIJY1CXXvjGJLBptYttI7nc36++QiqsFY+326Whyb0jHu5+h/b8k B/8XM6nroSV7iG6l1PpmKBqyyqA5Zwy1P3n/+z/jI4w5ZUUtjHk5WrKpRZyoH15Mz/ dRyoVQ56uokfoNO8OADQharWJpnnzXLBnBPuYwPoWGimk7t5TqBU5B4+CrJdhplMP2 TCJcmcxlFbhuDQzKbZg9usDlk1A4IamPhRC9ynNOgTKRtleKOcyfJWE/nAktt5GRL/ vsLMzGSwXikIKppTyAl1dzxm5QMud30CAJpNBV5CG47LzrYk6Ds0kzzOirVFXV6CLG tRd32RnIGTDMQ== Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 09:04:49 -0600 From: Keith Busch To: Shinichiro Kawasaki Cc: Keith Busch , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" , "axboe@kernel.dk" Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests] block tests: nvme metadata passthrough Message-ID: References: <20250606003015.3203624-1-kbusch@meta.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sat, Jun 07, 2025 at 12:54:50PM +0000, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote: > On Jun 05, 2025 / 17:30, Keith Busch wrote: > > From: Keith Busch > > > > Get more coverage on nvme metadata passthrough. Specifically in this > > test, read-only metadata is targeted as this had been a gap in previous > > test coveraged. > > Thanks for the patch. I ran the test case on the kernel v6.15, and it passed. > Is this pass result expected? I guess this test case intends to extend test > coverage, and does not intend to recreate the failure reported in the Link. > So, I'm guessing the test case should pass with v6.15 kernel. Oh, I thought it would fail in 6.15, or at least part of this test would have. I changed a lot at the last second before posting, so maybe I messed something up. I'll do another version after making sense of what's going on.