From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, axboe@kernel.dk,
sth@linux.ibm.com, gjoyce@ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] block: move elevator queue allocation logic into blk_mq_init_sched
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 23:07:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFGEzN5c0-b5VdcM@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250616173233.3803824-2-nilay@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 11:02:25PM +0530, Nilay Shroff wrote:
> In preparation for allocating sched_tags before freezing the request
> queue and acquiring ->elevator_lock, move the elevator queue allocation
> logic from the elevator ops ->init_sched callback into blk_mq_init_sched.
>
> This refactoring provides a centralized location for elevator queue
> initialization, which makes it easier to store pre-allocated sched_tags
> in the struct elevator_queue during later changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> block/bfq-iosched.c | 13 +++----------
> block/blk-mq-sched.c | 7 ++++++-
> block/elevator.h | 2 +-
> block/kyber-iosched.c | 11 ++---------
> block/mq-deadline.c | 14 ++------------
> 5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> index 0cb1e9873aab..fd26dc1901b0 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> @@ -7232,22 +7232,16 @@ static void bfq_init_root_group(struct bfq_group *root_group,
> root_group->sched_data.bfq_class_idle_last_service = jiffies;
> }
>
> -static int bfq_init_queue(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_type *e)
> +static int bfq_init_queue(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_queue *eq)
> {
> struct bfq_data *bfqd;
> - struct elevator_queue *eq;
> unsigned int i;
> struct blk_independent_access_ranges *ia_ranges = q->disk->ia_ranges;
>
> - eq = elevator_alloc(q, e);
> - if (!eq)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> bfqd = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*bfqd), GFP_KERNEL, q->node);
> - if (!bfqd) {
> - kobject_put(&eq->kobj);
> + if (!bfqd)
> return -ENOMEM;
> - }
> +
> eq->elevator_data = bfqd;
>
> spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
> @@ -7405,7 +7399,6 @@ static int bfq_init_queue(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_type *e)
>
> out_free:
> kfree(bfqd);
> - kobject_put(&eq->kobj);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> index 55a0fd105147..d914eb9d61a6 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> @@ -475,6 +475,10 @@ int blk_mq_init_sched(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_type *e)
> q->nr_requests = 2 * min_t(unsigned int, q->tag_set->queue_depth,
> BLKDEV_DEFAULT_RQ);
>
> + eq = elevator_alloc(q, e);
> + if (!eq)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> if (blk_mq_is_shared_tags(flags)) {
> ret = blk_mq_init_sched_shared_tags(q);
> if (ret)
The above failure needs to be handled by kobject_put(&eq->kobj).
Otherwise, feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-17 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-16 17:32 [PATCHv3 0/2] block: move sched_tags allocation/de-allocation outside of locking context Nilay Shroff
2025-06-16 17:32 ` [PATCHv3 1/2] block: move elevator queue allocation logic into blk_mq_init_sched Nilay Shroff
2025-06-17 15:07 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-06-20 14:39 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-06-20 15:17 ` Ming Lei
2025-06-20 16:13 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-06-23 5:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-23 9:14 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-06-16 17:32 ` [PATCHv3 2/2] block: fix lock dependency between percpu alloc lock and elevator lock Nilay Shroff
2025-06-18 3:06 ` Ming Lei
2025-06-18 6:52 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-06-23 6:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-23 9:33 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-06-23 13:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aFGEzN5c0-b5VdcM@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=gjoyce@ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sth@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox