From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Do we need an opt-in for file systems use of hw atomic writes?
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 06:53:29 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aHVuSU3TB4eNRq8V@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250714131713.GA8742@lst.de>
On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 03:17:13PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm currently trying to sort out the nvme atomics limits mess, and
> between that, the lack of a atomic write command in nvme, and the
> overall degrading quality of cheap consumer nvme devices I'm starting
> to free really uneasy about XFS using hardware atomics by default without
> an explicit opt-in, as broken atomics implementations will lead to
> really subtle data corruption.
>
> Is is just me, or would it be a good idea to require an explicit
> opt-in to user hardware atomics?
This isn't a filesystem question - this is a question about what
features the block device should expose by default to the
user/filesystem by default.
Block device feature configuration is typically done at hotplug time
with udev rules. Require the user to add a custom udev rule for the
block device to enable hardware atomics if you are concerned that
hardware atomic writes are problematic.
Once the user has opted in to having their bdev feature activated,
then the filesystem should be able to detect and use it
automatically.
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-14 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-14 13:17 Do we need an opt-in for file systems use of hw atomic writes? Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-14 13:24 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-07-14 13:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-14 16:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-15 6:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-15 3:22 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-07-15 6:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-15 12:45 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-07-14 13:39 ` John Garry
2025-07-14 13:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-14 15:53 ` John Garry
2025-07-15 6:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-15 8:42 ` John Garry
2025-07-15 9:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-19 11:42 ` John Garry
2025-08-19 13:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-19 14:36 ` John Garry
2025-08-19 14:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-19 14:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-21 14:01 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-15 10:02 ` Christian Brauner
2025-07-15 11:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-15 12:20 ` Christian Brauner
2025-07-15 11:58 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-07-14 20:53 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2025-07-15 6:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-15 20:56 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-16 5:50 ` Nilay Shroff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aHVuSU3TB4eNRq8V@dread.disaster.area \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).