From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3579220F2C; Thu, 28 Aug 2025 15:19:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756394364; cv=none; b=CNGy+TU4Uoci7uzfLoXZlnoYtLVh4zgeL1LURvZBmue5ZEOGj3JGnMNDDPruToPtPX5TXh3KMkf6N5/+r+EBCsPc72BiOswvMv7EDtY6AV5bqQ4vvmkUmvqrGUutPB6u6U6OU8GKvWpQ2NvlIKHzApedtebPHO17aZobGkHj8YE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756394364; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nTKrcpDsshWT34MR4DBCaPN8mPA7gJtcVOPD1NWA+qw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=u1mvEnU2IpNcmYxpK5k8whUxYOjt7HBLnLbwXz6cXLxFOKPgQxf73u630Oys8Ht5yZAI3ONW6Yj29KEKW/4nKDhBHe3YNdFeY7TlCRzEqWdzI3SNh41zw/IxPLiKBOJDrAGWodQzPIc7m0OTNnd/T9H6axFs7gYVfZSt/xl9d3g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Fiz/IFX/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Fiz/IFX/" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D216BC4CEEB; Thu, 28 Aug 2025 15:19:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1756394363; bh=nTKrcpDsshWT34MR4DBCaPN8mPA7gJtcVOPD1NWA+qw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Fiz/IFX/cbprksFrwcYLPDvY3Zj3oM+9xj/s3otiwCFW0WEBrDAgB6JRjK+IdqZnC OFN4Z0AL7m05VQmwPYApcrLewjZzB+NKCYXZOIU9ibwe7/P/cr26ecTqFmQEgaS6pv 89DgMHR/jfK9TG7bugNXs7ta3ON2u0FFPpRcZMhF8LuBBzR8fYiYNcrkRaeoqL84Pa vG8dcgdTqIBhIwwgWFEaigYJZlxM0LDruE+7Hf8BMGaT2uPwEeDcL2AHvfnUbMmlQ1 qic40gUjOmMG1Ib24qu6/1eYpqYTDcYO5/R+Bonh5umwbDCeb4/lCZ33BnqzYEikCq EOso5xuGJTjTg== Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 09:19:20 -0600 From: Keith Busch To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Marek Szyprowski , Leon Romanovsky , Jason Gunthorpe , Abdiel Janulgue , Alexander Potapenko , Alex Gaynor , Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig , Danilo Krummrich , iommu@lists.linux.dev, Jason Wang , Jens Axboe , Joerg Roedel , Jonathan Corbet , Juergen Gross , kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Madhavan Srinivasan , Masami Hiramatsu , Michael Ellerman , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Miguel Ojeda , Robin Murphy , rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, Sagi Grimberg , Stefano Stabellini , Steven Rostedt , virtualization@lists.linux.dev, Will Deacon , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/16] block-dma: properly take MMIO path Message-ID: References: <642dbeb7aa94257eaea71ec63c06e3f939270023.1755624249.git.leon@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <642dbeb7aa94257eaea71ec63c06e3f939270023.1755624249.git.leon@kernel.org> On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 08:36:59PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h > index 09b99d52fd36..283058bcb5b1 100644 > --- a/include/linux/blk_types.h > +++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h > @@ -387,6 +387,7 @@ enum req_flag_bits { > __REQ_FS_PRIVATE, /* for file system (submitter) use */ > __REQ_ATOMIC, /* for atomic write operations */ > __REQ_P2PDMA, /* contains P2P DMA pages */ > + __REQ_MMIO, /* contains MMIO memory */ > /* > * Command specific flags, keep last: > */ > @@ -420,6 +421,7 @@ enum req_flag_bits { > #define REQ_FS_PRIVATE (__force blk_opf_t)(1ULL << __REQ_FS_PRIVATE) > #define REQ_ATOMIC (__force blk_opf_t)(1ULL << __REQ_ATOMIC) > #define REQ_P2PDMA (__force blk_opf_t)(1ULL << __REQ_P2PDMA) > +#define REQ_MMIO (__force blk_opf_t)(1ULL << __REQ_MMIO) Now that my integrity metadata DMA series is staged, I don't think we can use REQ flags like this because data and metadata may have different mapping types. I think we should add a flags field to the dma_iova_state instead.