From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26FF62868A9 for ; Sat, 18 Oct 2025 19:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760815112; cv=none; b=NNhZg80TcpvLvoCuqEynSkRZxOHyHCfwwanpDciOjh9zbCEbpDYeVO7eAwFDSCC/qOdb5tQKeQ/aaHByq4nbm9pk1Of6wVsfs08hRvkhYqV1lucYlkoJMeGVnKA+n3dHL6vSFklP7QDnLVV0NwX0ePUDTlLgb76tKZt9IkN8p3A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760815112; c=relaxed/simple; bh=w05CNOrXPy1aJSCpU/iFbw/ziBEh1x9+eqcFGCBigBk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=f1fcQPP3OvZYDd0j4P23X24qzYKX7wjgcc7LwLpNn4CgxGmY2eKjKCXYK8JDOjOeDu+Qd/IG+hg1uIVMFhlKQITZDQu69afXVrBCl0G/dCbhK7cyb+A+2FzFDJIV9t98sn+43b5GFmHdaXS4gjnokEEN1hMULb37yr5ti32JehU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=FYD6ozFy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="FYD6ozFy" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1760815111; x=1792351111; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=w05CNOrXPy1aJSCpU/iFbw/ziBEh1x9+eqcFGCBigBk=; b=FYD6ozFy4DnW2ASMiwU1D0sSTGpRP7PQeN+WP0ABhkAwXN/fvTegGub1 4nVpEAeQE+hOmmj7pTdX9hjq0LJ0PeJFho69uML9SRVLhL7tMpYAloyIE 8f3vCwTbTUM18ryto8U8XGKeSrUsrYJh99pMmRDuwi1zLGMXh5uSEGGD3 XRFEZxLHkRNdjJzsiCqDG7GeZ3jJ+vIlJoOj2EQ5pGyqe39ckM0eHA1o8 lpF/mmzZ+pWHWYUX0mArVU0sRVsJc/kdDJzP2mm1C7RfPTHaKUQAFZWay gZDo7VTL7odepejnZLcmIOM4hpgi6Ux63w6zSHta6kiCExg2WzgmQFlYZ Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: bAxOVWoCRz+H6JVx0yrdSw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Ni8BxU1RRDWvE2Opu2trrw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11586"; a="63041702" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,239,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="63041702" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by fmvoesa108.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Oct 2025 12:18:30 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: slvOlB7qQNO3XNsQlwY9Jw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: oMD52Br6QfSYbN5ISHSXqA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,239,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="187250273" Received: from pgcooper-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO ashevche-desk.local) ([10.245.244.194]) by orviesa004-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Oct 2025 12:18:28 -0700 Received: from andy by ashevche-desk.local with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vACRd-00000000xOQ-1xfq; Sat, 18 Oct 2025 22:18:25 +0300 Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 22:18:25 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Alok Tiwari Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, phasta@kernel.org, fourier.thomas@gmail.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: mtip32xx: Fix typos in comments and log messages Message-ID: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Sun, Oct 12, 2025 at 11:40:03AM -0700, Alok Tiwari wrote: > This patch corrects several minor typos and spelling errors in mtip32xx.c > - Fixing "ge" -> "get" in a warning message. > - Correcting "kernrel" -> "kernel", "progess" -> "progress" > "strucutre" -> "structure" in comments. > > no functional impact. I would go further and add another patch that fixes kernel-doc warnings (Missing Return section). This one LGTM, though. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko