public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, axboe@kernel.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] blk-integrity: support arbitrary buffer alignment
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2025 09:20:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQ9tuPo7XLEAIc5i@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yq1y0ohjk5a.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>

On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 10:52:14PM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > +static void blk_crc(struct blk_integrity_iter *iter, void *data,
> > +		    unsigned int len)
> 
> Maybe blk_calculate_checksum() or blk_calculate_guard()? It's a bit
> weird to refer to the IP checksum as a CRC.

Sounds good.
 
> To my knowledge, no SCSI controller can handle PI split across segments
> and the PI tuples are required to be naturally aligned in memory. SCSI
> controllers probably can't handle split data segments either since the
> design constraint is one PI segment per protection interval sized data
> segment.

There are not many nvme controllers that can handle split pi segments
either. Anything setting ID_CTRL SGLS.MSDS can do it, but it's a rarely
advertised capability. For everyone else, metadata buffers have a single
segment limit.

As for interval data split across segments, that's totally fine for any
nvme that supports PI formats. That kind of data was mainly what I was
initially trying to handle here since that's sufficient to reinstate the
lower dma_alignment limit. It wasn't much more work to support split pi
though, unlikely as it is to have hardware capable of it.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-08 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-07 23:23 [PATCHv3] blk-integrity: support arbitrary buffer alignment Keith Busch
2025-11-08  3:52 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-11-08 16:20   ` Keith Busch [this message]
2025-11-11 14:14     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aQ9tuPo7XLEAIc5i@kbusch-mbp \
    --to=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox