[PATCH] block: fix typos in comments and strings in blk-core.c

[PATCH] block: fix typos in comments and strings in blk-core.c

[shechenglong]

This patch fixes multiple spelling mistakes in comments and documentation
in the file block/blk-core.c.

No functional changes intended.

Signed-off-by: shechenglong <shechenglong@xfusion.com>
---
 block/blk-core.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 14ae73eebe0d..7757cd589b59 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -662,13 +662,13 @@ static void __submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
  *    bio_list of new bios to be added.  ->submit_bio() may indeed add some more
  *    bios through a recursive call to submit_bio_noacct.  If it did, we find a
  *    non-NULL value in bio_list and re-enter the loop from the top.
- *  - In this case we really did just take the bio of the top of the list (no
+ *  - In this case we really did just take the bio off the top of the list (no
  *    pretending) and so remove it from bio_list, and call into ->submit_bio()
  *    again.
  *
  * bio_list_on_stack[0] contains bios submitted by the current ->submit_bio.
  * bio_list_on_stack[1] contains bios that were submitted before the current
- *	->submit_bio, but that haven't been processed yet.
+ *	->submit_bio(), but that haven't been processed yet.
  */
 static void __submit_bio_noacct(struct bio *bio)
 {
@@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ void submit_bio_noacct_nocheck(struct bio *bio, bool split)
 	/*
 	 * We only want one ->submit_bio to be active at a time, else stack
 	 * usage with stacked devices could be a problem.  Use current->bio_list
-	 * to collect a list of requests submited by a ->submit_bio method while
+	 * to collect a list of requests submitted by a ->submit_bio method while
 	 * it is active, and then process them after it returned.
 	 */
 	if (current->bio_list) {
@@ -901,7 +901,7 @@ static void bio_set_ioprio(struct bio *bio)
  *
  * submit_bio() is used to submit I/O requests to block devices.  It is passed a
  * fully set up &struct bio that describes the I/O that needs to be done.  The
- * bio will be send to the device described by the bi_bdev field.
+ * bio will be sent to the device described by the bi_bdev field.
  *
  * The success/failure status of the request, along with notification of
  * completion, is delivered asynchronously through the ->bi_end_io() callback
@@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ int iocb_bio_iopoll(struct kiocb *kiocb, struct io_comp_batch *iob,
 	 * point to a freshly allocated bio at this point.  If that happens
 	 * we have a few cases to consider:
 	 *
-	 *  1) the bio is beeing initialized and bi_bdev is NULL.  We can just
+	 *  1) the bio is being initialized and bi_bdev is NULL.  We can just
 	 *     simply nothing in this case
 	 *  2) the bio points to a not poll enabled device.  bio_poll will catch
 	 *     this and return 0
-- 
2.33.0

Re: [PATCH] block: fix typos in comments and strings in blk-core.c

[Chaitanya Kulkarni]

On 11/3/25 22:21, shechenglong wrote:
> This patch fixes multiple spelling mistakes in comments and documentation
> in the file block/blk-core.c.
>
> No functional changes intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: shechenglong<shechenglong@xfusion.com>


Looks good.

Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>

-ck

Re: [PATCH] block: fix typos in comments and strings in blk-core.c

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 02:21:13PM +0800, shechenglong wrote:
>  	 * usage with stacked devices could be a problem.  Use current->bio_list
> -	 * to collect a list of requests submited by a ->submit_bio method while
> +	 * to collect a list of requests submitted by a ->submit_bio method while

This now adds an overly long line.

[PATCH v2 0/1] block: fix typos in comments and strings in blk-core

[shechenglong]

> This now adds an overly long line.

Hi Christoph,

Thank you for your review and feedback.I've fixed the overly long line
by splitting it as you suggested.

shechenglong (1):
  block: fix typos in comments and strings in blk-core

 block/blk-core.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

-- 
2.33.0

[PATCH v2 1/1] block: fix typos in comments and strings in blk-core

[shechenglong]

This patch fixes multiple spelling mistakes in comments and documentation
in the file block/blk-core.c.

No functional changes intended.

Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: shechenglong <shechenglong@xfusion.com>
---
 block/blk-core.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 14ae73eebe0d..8387fe50ea15 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -662,13 +662,13 @@ static void __submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
  *    bio_list of new bios to be added.  ->submit_bio() may indeed add some more
  *    bios through a recursive call to submit_bio_noacct.  If it did, we find a
  *    non-NULL value in bio_list and re-enter the loop from the top.
- *  - In this case we really did just take the bio of the top of the list (no
+ *  - In this case we really did just take the bio off the top of the list (no
  *    pretending) and so remove it from bio_list, and call into ->submit_bio()
  *    again.
  *
  * bio_list_on_stack[0] contains bios submitted by the current ->submit_bio.
  * bio_list_on_stack[1] contains bios that were submitted before the current
- *	->submit_bio, but that haven't been processed yet.
+ *	->submit_bio(), but that haven't been processed yet.
  */
 static void __submit_bio_noacct(struct bio *bio)
 {
@@ -743,8 +743,8 @@ void submit_bio_noacct_nocheck(struct bio *bio, bool split)
 	/*
 	 * We only want one ->submit_bio to be active at a time, else stack
 	 * usage with stacked devices could be a problem.  Use current->bio_list
-	 * to collect a list of requests submited by a ->submit_bio method while
-	 * it is active, and then process them after it returned.
+	 * to collect a list of requests submitted by a ->submit_bio method
+	 * while it is active, and then process them after it returned.
 	 */
 	if (current->bio_list) {
 		if (split)
@@ -901,7 +901,7 @@ static void bio_set_ioprio(struct bio *bio)
  *
  * submit_bio() is used to submit I/O requests to block devices.  It is passed a
  * fully set up &struct bio that describes the I/O that needs to be done.  The
- * bio will be send to the device described by the bi_bdev field.
+ * bio will be sent to the device described by the bi_bdev field.
  *
  * The success/failure status of the request, along with notification of
  * completion, is delivered asynchronously through the ->bi_end_io() callback
@@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ int iocb_bio_iopoll(struct kiocb *kiocb, struct io_comp_batch *iob,
 	 * point to a freshly allocated bio at this point.  If that happens
 	 * we have a few cases to consider:
 	 *
-	 *  1) the bio is beeing initialized and bi_bdev is NULL.  We can just
+	 *  1) the bio is being initialized and bi_bdev is NULL.  We can just
 	 *     simply nothing in this case
 	 *  2) the bio points to a not poll enabled device.  bio_poll will catch
 	 *     this and return 0
-- 
2.33.0

[RESEND PATCH v2 0/1] block: fix typos in comments and strings in blk-core

[shechenglong]

> This now adds an overly long line.

Hi Christoph,

Thank you for your review and feedback.I've fixed the overly long line
by splitting it as you suggested.

shechenglong (1):
  block: fix typos in comments and strings in blk-core

 block/blk-core.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

-- 
2.33.0

[PATCH v2 1/1] block: fix typos in comments and strings in blk-core

[shechenglong]

This patch fixes multiple spelling mistakes in comments and documentation
in the file block/blk-core.c.

No functional changes intended.

Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: shechenglong <shechenglong@xfusion.com>
---
 block/blk-core.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 14ae73eebe0d..8387fe50ea15 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -662,13 +662,13 @@ static void __submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
  *    bio_list of new bios to be added.  ->submit_bio() may indeed add some more
  *    bios through a recursive call to submit_bio_noacct.  If it did, we find a
  *    non-NULL value in bio_list and re-enter the loop from the top.
- *  - In this case we really did just take the bio of the top of the list (no
+ *  - In this case we really did just take the bio off the top of the list (no
  *    pretending) and so remove it from bio_list, and call into ->submit_bio()
  *    again.
  *
  * bio_list_on_stack[0] contains bios submitted by the current ->submit_bio.
  * bio_list_on_stack[1] contains bios that were submitted before the current
- *	->submit_bio, but that haven't been processed yet.
+ *	->submit_bio(), but that haven't been processed yet.
  */
 static void __submit_bio_noacct(struct bio *bio)
 {
@@ -743,8 +743,8 @@ void submit_bio_noacct_nocheck(struct bio *bio, bool split)
 	/*
 	 * We only want one ->submit_bio to be active at a time, else stack
 	 * usage with stacked devices could be a problem.  Use current->bio_list
-	 * to collect a list of requests submited by a ->submit_bio method while
-	 * it is active, and then process them after it returned.
+	 * to collect a list of requests submitted by a ->submit_bio method
+	 * while it is active, and then process them after it returned.
 	 */
 	if (current->bio_list) {
 		if (split)
@@ -901,7 +901,7 @@ static void bio_set_ioprio(struct bio *bio)
  *
  * submit_bio() is used to submit I/O requests to block devices.  It is passed a
  * fully set up &struct bio that describes the I/O that needs to be done.  The
- * bio will be send to the device described by the bi_bdev field.
+ * bio will be sent to the device described by the bi_bdev field.
  *
  * The success/failure status of the request, along with notification of
  * completion, is delivered asynchronously through the ->bi_end_io() callback
@@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ int iocb_bio_iopoll(struct kiocb *kiocb, struct io_comp_batch *iob,
 	 * point to a freshly allocated bio at this point.  If that happens
 	 * we have a few cases to consider:
 	 *
-	 *  1) the bio is beeing initialized and bi_bdev is NULL.  We can just
+	 *  1) the bio is being initialized and bi_bdev is NULL.  We can just
 	 *     simply nothing in this case
 	 *  2) the bio points to a not poll enabled device.  bio_poll will catch
 	 *     this and return 0
-- 
2.33.0

Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] block: fix typos in comments and strings in blk-core

[Christoph Hellwig]

Looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Re: (subset) [PATCH v2 0/1] block: fix typos in comments and strings in blk-core

[Jens Axboe]

On Tue, 04 Nov 2025 20:34:59 +0800, shechenglong wrote:
> > This now adds an overly long line.
> 
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> Thank you for your review and feedback.I've fixed the overly long line
> by splitting it as you suggested.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] block: fix typos in comments and strings in blk-core
      commit: 3a64c46c40460386aeca6e8698076d1207aeaf44

Best regards,
-- 
Jens Axboe