From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, axboe@kernel.dk,
yi.zhang@redhat.com, czhong@redhat.com, yukuai@fnnas.com,
gjoyce@ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 2/5] block: move elevator tags into struct elevator_resources
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 10:52:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRKk5uz5altdiEil@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251110081457.1006206-3-nilay@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 01:44:49PM +0530, Nilay Shroff wrote:
> This patch introduces a new structure, struct elevator_resources, to
> group together all elevator-related resources that share the same
> lifetime. As a first step, this change moves the elevator tag pointer
> from struct elv_change_ctx into the new struct elevator_resources.
>
> Additionally, rename blk_mq_alloc_sched_tags_batch() and
> blk_mq_free_sched_tags_batch() to blk_mq_alloc_sched_res_batch() and
> blk_mq_free_sched_res_batch(), respectively. Introduce two new wrapper
> helpers, blk_mq_alloc_sched_res() and blk_mq_free_sched_res(), around
> blk_mq_alloc_sched_tags() and blk_mq_free_sched_tags().
>
> These changes pave the way for consolidating the allocation and freeing
> of elevator-specific resources into common helper functions. This
> refactoring improves encapsulation and prepares the code for future
> extensions, allowing additional elevator-specific data to be added to
> struct elevator_resources without cluttering struct elv_change_ctx.
>
> Subsequent patches will extend struct elevator_resources to include
> other elevator-related data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> block/blk-mq-sched.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> block/blk-mq-sched.h | 10 +++++---
> block/blk-mq.c | 2 +-
> block/elevator.c | 31 +++++++++++++------------
> block/elevator.h | 9 ++++++--
> 5 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> index 3d9386555a50..c7091ea4dccd 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> @@ -427,7 +427,16 @@ void blk_mq_free_sched_tags(struct elevator_tags *et,
> kfree(et);
> }
>
> -void blk_mq_free_sched_tags_batch(struct xarray *elv_tbl,
> +void blk_mq_free_sched_res(struct elevator_resources *res,
> + struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
> +{
> + if (res->et) {
> + blk_mq_free_sched_tags(res->et, set);
> + res->et = NULL;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +void blk_mq_free_sched_res_batch(struct xarray *elv_tbl,
> struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
> {
> struct request_queue *q;
> @@ -445,12 +454,11 @@ void blk_mq_free_sched_tags_batch(struct xarray *elv_tbl,
> */
> if (q->elevator) {
> ctx = xa_load(elv_tbl, q->id);
> - if (!ctx || !ctx->et) {
> + if (!ctx) {
> WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> continue;
> }
> - blk_mq_free_sched_tags(ctx->et, set);
> - ctx->et = NULL;
> + blk_mq_free_sched_res(&ctx->res, set);
> }
> }
> }
> @@ -532,12 +540,22 @@ struct elevator_tags *blk_mq_alloc_sched_tags(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
> return NULL;
> }
>
> -int blk_mq_alloc_sched_tags_batch(struct xarray *elv_tbl,
> +int blk_mq_alloc_sched_res(struct elevator_resources *res,
> + struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, unsigned int nr_hw_queues)
In patch 4, `struct request_queue *` is added to parameter of
blk_mq_alloc_sched_res(), so why not add it from beginning?
Then ` struct blk_mq_tag_set *set` can be avoided.
Similar with blk_mq_free_sched_res().
This way is more readable, because scheduler is request_queue
wide.
> +{
> + res->et = blk_mq_alloc_sched_tags(set, nr_hw_queues,
> + blk_mq_default_nr_requests(set));
> + if (!res->et)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int blk_mq_alloc_sched_res_batch(struct xarray *elv_tbl,
> struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, unsigned int nr_hw_queues)
> {
> struct elv_change_ctx *ctx;
> struct request_queue *q;
> - struct elevator_tags *et;
> int ret = -ENOMEM;
>
> lockdep_assert_held_write(&set->update_nr_hwq_lock);
> @@ -557,11 +575,10 @@ int blk_mq_alloc_sched_tags_batch(struct xarray *elv_tbl,
> goto out_unwind;
> }
>
> - ctx->et = blk_mq_alloc_sched_tags(set, nr_hw_queues,
> - blk_mq_default_nr_requests(set));
> - if (!ctx->et)
> + ret = blk_mq_alloc_sched_res(&ctx->res, set,
> + nr_hw_queues);
> + if (ret)
> goto out_unwind;
> -
> }
> }
> return 0;
> @@ -569,10 +586,8 @@ int blk_mq_alloc_sched_tags_batch(struct xarray *elv_tbl,
> list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list) {
> if (q->elevator) {
> ctx = xa_load(elv_tbl, q->id);
> - if (ctx && ctx->et) {
> - blk_mq_free_sched_tags(ctx->et, set);
> - ctx->et = NULL;
> - }
> + if (ctx)
> + blk_mq_free_sched_res(&ctx->res, set);
> }
> }
> return ret;
> @@ -580,7 +595,7 @@ int blk_mq_alloc_sched_tags_batch(struct xarray *elv_tbl,
>
> /* caller must have a reference to @e, will grab another one if successful */
> int blk_mq_init_sched(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_type *e,
> - struct elevator_tags *et)
> + struct elevator_resources *res)
> {
> unsigned int flags = q->tag_set->flags;
> struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
> @@ -588,23 +603,23 @@ int blk_mq_init_sched(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_type *e,
> unsigned long i;
> int ret;
>
> - eq = elevator_alloc(q, e, et);
> + eq = elevator_alloc(q, e, res->et);
> if (!eq)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - q->nr_requests = et->nr_requests;
> + q->nr_requests = res->et->nr_requests;
>
> if (blk_mq_is_shared_tags(flags)) {
> /* Shared tags are stored at index 0 in @et->tags. */
> - q->sched_shared_tags = et->tags[0];
> - blk_mq_tag_update_sched_shared_tags(q, et->nr_requests);
> + q->sched_shared_tags = res->et->tags[0];
> + blk_mq_tag_update_sched_shared_tags(q, res->et->nr_requests);
> }
>
> queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
> if (blk_mq_is_shared_tags(flags))
> hctx->sched_tags = q->sched_shared_tags;
> else
> - hctx->sched_tags = et->tags[i];
> + hctx->sched_tags = res->et->tags[i];
> }
Adding one local variable of 'et' could kill all above changes, looks you like
big patch, but up to you.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-11 2:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-10 8:14 [PATCHv4 0/5] block: restructure elevator switch path and fix a lockdep splat Nilay Shroff
2025-11-10 8:14 ` [PATCHv4 1/5] block: unify elevator tags and type xarrays into struct elv_change_ctx Nilay Shroff
2025-11-11 6:55 ` Yu Kuai
2025-11-11 8:37 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-11-11 10:02 ` Yu Kuai
2025-11-11 12:00 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-11-10 8:14 ` [PATCHv4 2/5] block: move elevator tags into struct elevator_resources Nilay Shroff
2025-11-11 2:52 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-11-11 6:49 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-11-10 8:14 ` [PATCHv4 3/5] block: introduce alloc_sched_data and free_sched_data elevator methods Nilay Shroff
2025-11-11 2:53 ` Ming Lei
2025-11-11 7:20 ` Yu Kuai
2025-11-11 8:39 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-11-10 8:14 ` [PATCHv4 4/5] block: use {alloc|free}_sched data methods Nilay Shroff
2025-11-11 2:58 ` Ming Lei
2025-11-11 6:51 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-11-10 8:14 ` [PATCHv4 5/5] block: define alloc_sched_data and free_sched_data methods for kyber Nilay Shroff
2025-11-11 3:01 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aRKk5uz5altdiEil@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=czhong@redhat.com \
--cc=gjoyce@ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
--cc=yukuai@fnnas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).