From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Yu Kuai <yukuai@fnnas.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
axboe@kernel.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 1/2] block: accumulate memory segment gaps per bio
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 08:54:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRNALUnnxzIuyHng@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251111134001.GA708@lst.de>
On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 02:40:01PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 08:25:38AM -0500, Keith Busch wrote:
> > Ah, so we're merging a discard for a device that doesn't support
> > vectored discard. I think we still want to be able to front/back merge
> > such requests, though.
>
> Yes, but purely based on bi_sector/bi_size, not based on the payload.
This should do it:
---
diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
index 3ca6fbf8b7870..d3115d7469df0 100644
--- a/block/blk-merge.c
+++ b/block/blk-merge.c
@@ -737,6 +737,9 @@ u8 bio_seg_gap(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *prev, struct bio *next,
{
struct bio_vec pb, nb;
+ if (!bio_has_data(prev))
+ return 0;
+
gaps_bit = min_not_zero(gaps_bit, prev->bi_bvec_gap_bit);
gaps_bit = min_not_zero(gaps_bit, next->bi_bvec_gap_bit);
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-11 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-14 15:04 [PATCHv5 0/2] block, nvme: removing virtual boundary mask reliance Keith Busch
2025-10-14 15:04 ` [PATCHv5 1/2] block: accumulate memory segment gaps per bio Keith Busch
2025-10-14 21:18 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-10-15 4:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-11 4:26 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-11-11 4:50 ` Keith Busch
2025-11-11 7:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-11 9:36 ` Yu Kuai
2025-11-11 9:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-11 10:14 ` Yu Kuai
2025-11-11 13:25 ` Keith Busch
2025-11-11 13:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-11 13:54 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2025-11-11 13:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-11 14:03 ` Yu Kuai
2025-10-14 15:04 ` [PATCHv5 2/2] nvme: remove virtual boundary for sgl capable devices Keith Busch
2025-10-14 21:19 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-11-07 1:03 ` [PATCHv5 0/2] block, nvme: removing virtual boundary mask reliance Keith Busch
2025-11-07 1:12 ` Jens Axboe
2025-11-07 1:12 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aRNALUnnxzIuyHng@kbusch-mbp \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@meta.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yukuai@fnnas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox