From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, axboe@kernel.dk,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4] blk-integrity: support arbitrary buffer alignment
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 13:14:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRYf9S-UuJqa37fi@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251113173135.GD1792@sol>
On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 09:31:35AM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 07:26:21AM -0800, Keith Busch wrote:
> > +static void blk_set_ip_pi(struct t10_pi_tuple *pi,
> > + struct blk_integrity_iter *iter)
> > {
> > - u8 offset = bi->pi_offset;
> > - unsigned int i;
> > -
> > - for (i = 0 ; i < iter->data_size ; i += iter->interval) {
> > - struct crc64_pi_tuple *pi = iter->prot_buf + offset;
> > + __be16 csum = (__force __be16)~(lower_16_bits(iter->crc));
>
> This just throws away half of the checksum instead of properly combining
> the two halves. How is this being tested?
Yeah, this is the only guard type I've never seen a device subscribe to,
so not particularly easily tested on my side. I just forced the code
path down here anyway and checked if the result matches the result from
the existing code calling "ip_compute_csum()". Maybe I can just continue
using that as I suspect devices using that can't handle split data
intervals that I'm trying to enable.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-13 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-13 15:26 [PATCHv4] blk-integrity: support arbitrary buffer alignment Keith Busch
2025-11-13 17:31 ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-13 18:14 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2025-11-13 19:20 ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-13 19:48 ` Keith Busch
2025-11-13 19:55 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-11-13 19:57 ` Keith Busch
2025-11-13 20:02 ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-13 20:11 ` Keith Busch
2025-11-13 20:21 ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-13 20:21 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aRYf9S-UuJqa37fi@kbusch-mbp \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@meta.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox