From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq-dma: always initialize dma state
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 16:06:57 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aTkcEeRFPHuN8d9f@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251210065407.GA650@lst.de>
On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 07:54:07AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 10:49:15PM -0800, Keith Busch wrote:
> > - if (blk_can_dma_map_iova(req, dma_dev) &&
> > - dma_iova_try_alloc(dma_dev, state, vec.paddr, total_len))
> > + if (!blk_can_dma_map_iova(req, dma_dev))
> > + memset(state, 0, sizeof(*state));
> > + else if (dma_iova_try_alloc(dma_dev, state, vec.paddr, total_len))
> > return blk_rq_dma_map_iova(req, dma_dev, state, iter, &vec);
>
> What about just doing the memset unconditionally? It's just two
> 64-bit fields so no real overhead, and it gives us a clean slate that
> avoid introducing other bugs later on.
I didn't do that is because dma_iova_try_alloc() also does that, so it'd
be two repeated and unnecessary memset's on the same address. That feels
undesirable no matter how small the struct is. I could remove the memset
in dma_iova_try_alloc instead and make the caller initialize it. There
are only two existing users of the API, so not a big deal to change it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-10 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-10 6:49 [PATCH] blk-mq-dma: always initialize dma state Keith Busch
2025-12-10 6:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 7:06 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2025-12-10 8:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 10:38 ` Sebastian Ott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aTkcEeRFPHuN8d9f@kbusch-mbp \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@meta.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sebott@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox