linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Stanley Zhang <stazhang@purestorage.com>,
	Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/20] ublk: implement integrity user copy
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2025 10:38:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aU31Ey2jWJi8U_53@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251217053455.281509-13-csander@purestorage.com>

On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 10:34:46PM -0700, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
> From: Stanley Zhang <stazhang@purestorage.com>
> 
> Add a function ublk_copy_user_integrity() to copy integrity information
> between a request and a user iov_iter. This mirrors the existing
> ublk_copy_user_pages() but operates on request integrity data instead of
> regular data. Check UBLKSRV_IO_INTEGRITY_FLAG in iocb->ki_pos in
> ublk_user_copy() to choose between copying data or integrity data.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanley Zhang <stazhang@purestorage.com>
> [csander: change offset units from data bytes to integrity data bytes,
>  test UBLKSRV_IO_INTEGRITY_FLAG after subtracting UBLKSRV_IO_BUF_OFFSET,
>  fix CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY=n build,
>  rebase on ublk user copy refactor]
> Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
> ---
>  drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> index 7fa0a9f0bfae..042df4de9253 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> @@ -606,10 +606,15 @@ static inline unsigned ublk_pos_to_tag(loff_t pos)
>  {
>  	return ((pos - UBLKSRV_IO_BUF_OFFSET) >> UBLK_TAG_OFF) &
>  		UBLK_TAG_BITS_MASK;
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool ublk_pos_is_integrity(loff_t pos)
> +{
> +	return !!((pos - UBLKSRV_IO_BUF_OFFSET) & UBLKSRV_IO_INTEGRITY_FLAG);
> +}
> +
>  static void ublk_dev_param_basic_apply(struct ublk_device *ub)
>  {
>  	const struct ublk_param_basic *p = &ub->params.basic;
>  
>  	if (p->attrs & UBLK_ATTR_READ_ONLY)
> @@ -1034,10 +1039,31 @@ static size_t ublk_copy_user_pages(const struct request *req,
>  			break;
>  	}
>  	return done;
>  }
>  
> +static size_t ublk_copy_user_integrity(const struct request *req,
> +		unsigned offset, struct iov_iter *uiter, int dir)
> +{
> +	size_t done = 0;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY
> +	struct bio *bio = req->bio;
> +	struct bvec_iter iter;
> +	struct bio_vec iv;
> +
> +	if (!blk_integrity_rq(req))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	bio_for_each_integrity_vec(iv, bio, iter) {
> +		if (!ublk_copy_user_bvec(iv, &offset, uiter, dir, &done))
> +			break;
> +	}
> +#endif
> +
> +	return done;
> +}

The usual way is to define the whole helper conditionally:

#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY
static size_t ublk_copy_user_integrity(const struct request *req,
		unsigned offset, struct iov_iter *uiter, int dir)
{
	...
}
#else
static inline size_t ublk_copy_user_integrity(const struct request *req,
		unsigned offset, struct iov_iter *uiter, int dir)
{
	return 0;
}
#endif

Otherwise, this patch looks fine.


Thanks, 
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-26  2:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-17  5:34 [PATCH 00/20] ublk: add support for integrity data Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-17  5:34 ` [PATCH 01/20] block: validate pi_offset integrity limit Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-18  8:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-17  5:34 ` [PATCH 02/20] block: validate interval_exp " Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-18  8:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-17  5:34 ` [PATCH 03/20] blk-integrity: take const pointer in blk_integrity_rq() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-19 14:16   ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17  5:34 ` [PATCH 04/20] ublk: add integrity UAPI Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-22 14:26   ` Ming Lei
2025-12-22 15:09     ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-23  1:51       ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17  5:34 ` [PATCH 05/20] ublk: move ublk flag check functions earlier Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-22 14:30   ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17  5:34 ` [PATCH 06/20] ublk: support UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_INTEGRITY in device creation Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-22 14:47   ` Ming Lei
2025-12-22 15:35     ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-23  1:58       ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17  5:34 ` [PATCH 07/20] ublk: set UBLK_IO_F_INTEGRITY in ublksrv_io_desc Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-22 14:48   ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17  5:34 ` [PATCH 08/20] ublk: add ublk_copy_user_bvec() helper Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-22 14:52   ` Ming Lei
2025-12-22 15:37     ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-17  5:34 ` [PATCH 09/20] ublk: split out ublk_user_copy() helper Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-22 14:58   ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17  5:34 ` [PATCH 10/20] ublk: inline ublk_check_and_get_req() into ublk_user_copy() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-26  2:10   ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17  5:34 ` [PATCH 11/20] ublk: move offset check out of __ublk_check_and_get_req() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-26  2:15   ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17  5:34 ` [PATCH 12/20] ublk: implement integrity user copy Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-26  2:38   ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-12-17  5:34 ` [PATCH 13/20] ublk: optimize ublk_user_copy() on daemon task Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-26  2:51   ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17  5:34 ` [PATCH 14/20] selftests: ublk: add utility to get block device metadata size Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-17  5:34 ` [PATCH 15/20] selftests: ublk: add kublk support for integrity params Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-17  5:34 ` [PATCH 16/20] selftests: ublk: implement integrity user copy in kublk Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-17  5:34 ` [PATCH 17/20] selftests: ublk: support non-O_DIRECT backing files Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-17  5:34 ` [PATCH 18/20] selftests: ublk: add integrity data support to loop target Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-17  5:34 ` [PATCH 19/20] selftests: ublk: add integrity params test Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-17  5:34 ` [PATCH 20/20] selftests: ublk: add end-to-end integrity test Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-18 16:54 ` (subset) [PATCH 00/20] ublk: add support for integrity data Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aU31Ey2jWJi8U_53@fedora \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=csander@purestorage.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=stazhang@purestorage.com \
    --cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).