From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>,
Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ublk: fix deadlock when reading partition table
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 11:09:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aUIe3RXASOEKKc0m@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5e2038e1-efcf-4313-8a14-565b970370f2@kernel.dk>
On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 10:57:25AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 12/16/25 8:03 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> The issue for ublk is actually triggered by something abnormal: submit AIO
> >> & close(ublk disk) in client application, then fput() is called when the
> >> submitted AIO is done, it will cause deferred fput handler to wq for any block
> >> IO completed from irq handler.
> >
> > My suggested logic is something ala this in bdev_release():
> >
> > if (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD) {
> > mutex_lock(&disk->open_mutex);
> > } else {
> > if (!mutex_trylock(&disk->open_mutex)) {
> > deferred_put(file);
> > return;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > and that's about it.
>
> I took a look at the bug report, and now it makes more sense to me -
> this is an aio only issue, as it does fput() from ->bi_end_io() context.
> That's pretty nasty, as you don't really know what context that might
> be, both in terms of irq/bh state, but also in terms of locks. The
> former fput() does work around.
>
> Why isn't the fix something as simple as the below, with your comment
> added on top? I'm not aware of anyone else that would do fput off
> ->bi_end_io, so we migt as well treat the source of the issue rather
> than work around it in ublk. THAT makes a lot more sense to me.
It doesn't matter if fput is called from ->bi_end_io() directly, it can
be triggered on io-uring indirectly too, in which fput() is called from
__io_submit_flush_completions() in case of non-registerd file.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-17 3:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-12 14:34 [PATCH V2] ublk: fix deadlock when reading partition table Ming Lei
2025-12-12 16:57 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-12 19:49 ` Jens Axboe
2025-12-13 2:28 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-14 6:41 ` Jens Axboe
2025-12-16 8:56 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-16 15:03 ` Jens Axboe
2025-12-16 17:57 ` Jens Axboe
2025-12-17 3:09 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-12-17 3:19 ` Jens Axboe
2025-12-17 3:33 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-18 2:37 ` Jens Axboe
2025-12-18 2:41 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aUIe3RXASOEKKc0m@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox