From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD5A425B662 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 14:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766153805; cv=none; b=AXhbQBbndXNlcP3KPYbYvDwsszg6kqq3XIOeJ7Ri8BSJFw7C30Hj/cUMOAuRNAgiwoMLeL327rcZBGEXZf24PBeVVDWjQAGddCg5vZSOO8l1uMePNmTheaqq4Hc7mDGWV7npuidk1iBbou+FMmFS3CkZewmFgQivmDeCqqrUmv8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766153805; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qFdBthuvOaf5gMDGOSU82adg6xi1wuqIG4gH/BzEp80=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kXWQJipfR1QkIclxvJ0a4MJ98/3MyAqtc+pnvWI0EQchpnnGAJfhrz44N4hMx0BXWYHAkGYVI5ABYV3nK2Wv/oJo8VkPHk81BbRZtKQKWyQBRidoLs09+VW1f0qz8QdYzQRWBV6KXCK8cJ8+XZACJ/PqlwfU9d3X1n58VPjAffk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=F2lFlDzP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="F2lFlDzP" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1766153802; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iWXPrzLiJtl4wMOdUVzXHjiRsKB7d+Unwe6U8L+x5pE=; b=F2lFlDzPAAsi569A/EBFMTHbLxrMjslKnXFegAqsMgkwrx97s87i4t9sJ77G1ir+cjARlo EP3WJjyiYi8lxV38aEtftuhitR7Wc1P3aNEWEvpzuKYdcnguFRWL5WcGC2Xv/f5I8MyNHW x30BtNeAryo+58hZcaOmKw7aCZR+fOE= Received: from mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-36-9u1jT9wROnWuWrlt2bYX1A-1; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 09:16:39 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 9u1jT9wROnWuWrlt2bYX1A-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 9u1jT9wROnWuWrlt2bYX1A_1766153797 Received: from mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.111]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D986195608E; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 14:16:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fedora (unknown [10.72.116.41]) by mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3082A180045B; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 14:16:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 22:16:14 +0800 From: Ming Lei To: Caleb Sander Mateos Cc: Jens Axboe , Shuah Khan , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stanley Zhang , Uday Shankar Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/20] blk-integrity: take const pointer in blk_integrity_rq() Message-ID: References: <20251217053455.281509-1-csander@purestorage.com> <20251217053455.281509-4-csander@purestorage.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251217053455.281509-4-csander@purestorage.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.111 On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 10:34:37PM -0700, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote: > blk_integrity_rq() doesn't modify the struct request passed in, so allow > a const pointer to be passed. Use a matching signature for the > !CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY version. > > Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos Reviewed-by: Ming Lei Thanks, Ming