From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BFE632470A for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2026 09:48:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767779322; cv=none; b=ZLf0jIic+ubgiiRw/t9NzjxncoLxRmizbHTJaq2EYDOlfKXbYe5GGGkYMCLr2fHjWIv0HPOJHuWhTcLc4REqLrnflzs0EagKiwozRaSrJVymD317W7DwO1lI6+DhfahhliZwNrNRizxLsSSWrMH0w/QrevKjjeHorQXckz8WrdQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767779322; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uVRmdGCSayyGjI/b7AL/T79yXt1DSW5tjzBwgib8s0E=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=oPeESHLpIJelKTDL8AIkcuVwl3pxcbEyemdBd39t5AJqqCHbctFfyG99Eur3Wrv7IpxKlWLySarlilmAQ+r9vOxKsgUC79bXmNOhzr64fPLx/fTje6cNsyNaG7pyjSNSF/f1NxA32CrbwYQPp0Kd+NFvjbD6Pz7p/iBuZb3R9ag= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=JR8EAZK/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="JR8EAZK/" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1767779319; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vUpP78PSALste0yX423rkzHxQgZmH0i5Q7OsoeOml6w=; b=JR8EAZK/+I+DF4YHri+3KI24ndxPSszfI6UY2XRxRbiBkGa52AYdn6SGkQO0tjr7Blx5H6 DPEHY36U3++b+pUxzCMSQo+J5Pa7qfK7+UYkL5S+bOTqm6Z5y/cONqGg2bQPwcJBpspKAS iaSSBSLpmmjGsgClcYq1muRuS3Rlf1w= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-529-U7kLOQZiOWa9UO66jn2lww-1; Wed, 07 Jan 2026 04:48:36 -0500 X-MC-Unique: U7kLOQZiOWa9UO66jn2lww-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: U7kLOQZiOWa9UO66jn2lww_1767779315 Received: from mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4E1A1956054; Wed, 7 Jan 2026 09:48:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fedora (unknown [10.72.116.199]) by mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45DAE1956048; Wed, 7 Jan 2026 09:48:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 17:48:26 +0800 From: Ming Lei To: Yu Kuai Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, nilay@linux.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/16] blk-mq-debugfs: remove blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_rqos() Message-ID: References: <20251231085126.205310-1-yukuai@fnnas.com> <20251231085126.205310-7-yukuai@fnnas.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251231085126.205310-7-yukuai@fnnas.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.17 On Wed, Dec 31, 2025 at 04:51:16PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote: > Because this helper is only used by iocost and iolatency, while they > don't have debugfs entries. > > Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai rq_qos_del() is only used by iocost and iolatency, so looks correct: Reviewed-by: Ming Lei Thanks, Ming