From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Stanley Zhang <stazhang@purestorage.com>,
Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/19] ublk: set request integrity params in ublksrv_io_desc
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2026 22:14:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aVkkSxNNUBMz9E61@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260103004529.1582405-5-csander@purestorage.com>
On Fri, Jan 02, 2026 at 05:45:14PM -0700, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
> Indicate to the ublk server when an incoming request has integrity data
> by setting UBLK_IO_F_INTEGRITY in the ublksrv_io_desc's op_flags field.
> If the ublk device doesn't support integrity, the request will never
> provide integrity data. If the ublk device supports integrity, the
> request may omit the integrity buffer only if metadata_size matches the
> PI tuple size determined by csum_type. In this case, the ublk server
> should internally generate/verify the protection information from the
> data and sector offset.
> Set the UBLK_IO_F_CHECK_{GUARD,REFTAG,APPTAG} flags based on the
> request's BIP_CHECK_{GUARD,REFTAG,APPTAG} flags, indicating whether to
> verify the guard, reference, and app tags in the protection information.
> The expected reference tag (32 or 48 bits) and app tag (16 bits) are
> indicated in ublksrv_io_desc's new struct ublksrv_io_integrity integrity
> field. This field is unioned with the addr field to avoid changing the
It might be fine to set per-rq app_tag, but bios in one request might have
different app_tag in case of io merge actually.
Also block layer builds ref_tag for each internal, please see
t10_pi_generate() and ext_pi_crc64_generate().
So looks this way is wrong.
More importantly reusing iod->addr for other purpose not related with IO
buffer is very unfriendly for adding new features, and one lesson is for ZONED support
by reusing ublksrv_io_cmd->addr for zoned's append lba.
For example, there is chance to support dma-buf based zero copy for ublk, and
please see the io-uring dma-buf support[1], and iod->addr might carry IO buffer info
in dma-buf format in future.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/cover.1763725387.git.asml.silence@gmail.com/#t
> size of struct ublksrv_io_desc. UBLK_F_INTEGRITY requires
> UBLK_F_USER_COPY and the addr field isn't used for UBLK_F_USER_COPY, so
> the two fields aren't needed simultaneously.
>
> Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> index 2f9316febf83..51469e0627ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> @@ -316,10 +316,36 @@ static inline bool ublk_dev_is_zoned(const struct ublk_device *ub)
> static inline bool ublk_queue_is_zoned(const struct ublk_queue *ubq)
> {
> return ubq->flags & UBLK_F_ZONED;
> }
>
> +static void ublk_setup_iod_buf(const struct ublk_queue *ubq,
> + const struct request *req,
> + struct ublksrv_io_desc *iod)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY
> + if (ubq->flags & UBLK_F_INTEGRITY) {
> + struct bio_integrity_payload *bip;
> + sector_t ref_tag_seed;
> +
> + if (!blk_integrity_rq(req))
> + return;
> +
> + bip = bio_integrity(req->bio);
> + ref_tag_seed = bip_get_seed(bip);
As mentioned, t10_pi_generate() and ext_pi_crc64_generate() builds
per-internal ref tag.
> + iod->integrity.ref_tag_lo = ref_tag_seed;
> + iod->integrity.ref_tag_hi = ref_tag_seed >> 32;
> + iod->integrity.app_tag = bip->app_tag;
In case of io merge, each bio may have different ->app_tag.
Given you have to copy meta data via user copy, I suggest to follow the PI
standard and make it per-internal.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-03 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-03 0:45 [PATCH v2 00/19] ublk: add support for integrity data Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-03 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 01/19] blk-integrity: take const pointer in blk_integrity_rq() Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-04 21:50 ` Martin K. Petersen
2026-01-03 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 02/19] ublk: move ublk flag check functions earlier Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-03 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 03/19] ublk: support UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_INTEGRITY in device creation Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-03 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 04/19] ublk: set request integrity params in ublksrv_io_desc Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-03 14:14 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2026-01-05 16:44 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-06 1:55 ` Ming Lei
2026-01-07 17:45 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-03 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 05/19] ublk: add ublk_copy_user_bvec() helper Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-03 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 06/19] ublk: split out ublk_user_copy() helper Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-03 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 07/19] ublk: inline ublk_check_and_get_req() into ublk_user_copy() Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-03 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 08/19] ublk: move offset check out of __ublk_check_and_get_req() Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-03 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 09/19] ublk: implement integrity user copy Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-03 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 10/19] ublk: support UBLK_F_INTEGRITY Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-03 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 11/19] ublk: optimize ublk_user_copy() on daemon task Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-03 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 12/19] selftests: ublk: display UBLK_F_INTEGRITY support Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-03 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 13/19] selftests: ublk: add utility to get block device metadata size Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-03 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 14/19] selftests: ublk: add kublk support for integrity params Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-03 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 15/19] selftests: ublk: implement integrity user copy in kublk Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-03 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 16/19] selftests: ublk: support non-O_DIRECT backing files Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-03 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 17/19] selftests: ublk: add integrity data support to loop target Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-03 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 18/19] selftests: ublk: add integrity params test Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-03 0:45 ` [PATCH v2 19/19] selftests: ublk: add end-to-end integrity test Caleb Sander Mateos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aVkkSxNNUBMz9E61@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=stazhang@purestorage.com \
--cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).