* [PATCH] ublk: fix use-after-free in ublk_partition_scan_work
@ 2026-01-09 12:14 Ming Lei
2026-01-09 13:57 ` Jens Axboe
2026-01-09 15:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2026-01-09 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe, linux-block
Cc: Caleb Sander Mateos, Uday Shankar, Ming Lei, Ruikai Peng
A race condition exists between the async partition scan work and device
teardown that can lead to a use-after-free of ub->ub_disk:
1. ublk_ctrl_start_dev() schedules partition_scan_work after add_disk()
2. ublk_stop_dev() calls ublk_stop_dev_unlocked() which does:
- del_gendisk(ub->ub_disk)
- ublk_detach_disk() sets ub->ub_disk = NULL
- put_disk() which may free the disk
3. The worker ublk_partition_scan_work() then dereferences ub->ub_disk
leading to UAF
Fix this by using ublk_get_disk()/ublk_put_disk() in the worker to hold
a reference to the disk during the partition scan. The spinlock in
ublk_get_disk() synchronizes with ublk_detach_disk() ensuring the worker
either gets a valid reference or sees NULL and exits early.
Also change flush_work() to cancel_work_sync() to avoid running the
partition scan work unnecessarily when the disk is already detached.
Fixes: 7fc4da6a304b ("ublk: scan partition in async way")
Reported-by: Ruikai Peng <ruikai@pwno.io>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index 837fedb02e0d..f6e5a0766721 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -255,20 +255,6 @@ static inline struct request *__ublk_check_and_get_req(struct ublk_device *ub,
u16 q_id, u16 tag, struct ublk_io *io, size_t offset);
static inline unsigned int ublk_req_build_flags(struct request *req);
-static void ublk_partition_scan_work(struct work_struct *work)
-{
- struct ublk_device *ub =
- container_of(work, struct ublk_device, partition_scan_work);
-
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!test_and_clear_bit(GD_SUPPRESS_PART_SCAN,
- &ub->ub_disk->state)))
- return;
-
- mutex_lock(&ub->ub_disk->open_mutex);
- bdev_disk_changed(ub->ub_disk, false);
- mutex_unlock(&ub->ub_disk->open_mutex);
-}
-
static inline struct ublksrv_io_desc *
ublk_get_iod(const struct ublk_queue *ubq, unsigned tag)
{
@@ -1597,6 +1583,27 @@ static void ublk_put_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
put_device(disk_to_dev(disk));
}
+static void ublk_partition_scan_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct ublk_device *ub =
+ container_of(work, struct ublk_device, partition_scan_work);
+ /* Hold disk reference to prevent UAF during concurrent teardown */
+ struct gendisk *disk = ublk_get_disk(ub);
+
+ if (!disk)
+ return;
+
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!test_and_clear_bit(GD_SUPPRESS_PART_SCAN,
+ &disk->state)))
+ goto out;
+
+ mutex_lock(&disk->open_mutex);
+ bdev_disk_changed(disk, false);
+ mutex_unlock(&disk->open_mutex);
+out:
+ ublk_put_disk(disk);
+}
+
/*
* Use this function to ensure that ->canceling is consistently set for
* the device and all queues. Do not set these flags directly.
@@ -2041,7 +2048,7 @@ static void ublk_stop_dev(struct ublk_device *ub)
mutex_lock(&ub->mutex);
ublk_stop_dev_unlocked(ub);
mutex_unlock(&ub->mutex);
- flush_work(&ub->partition_scan_work);
+ cancel_work_sync(&ub->partition_scan_work);
ublk_cancel_dev(ub);
}
--
2.47.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ublk: fix use-after-free in ublk_partition_scan_work
2026-01-09 12:14 [PATCH] ublk: fix use-after-free in ublk_partition_scan_work Ming Lei
@ 2026-01-09 13:57 ` Jens Axboe
2026-01-09 15:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2026-01-09 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-block, Ming Lei; +Cc: Caleb Sander Mateos, Uday Shankar, Ruikai Peng
On Fri, 09 Jan 2026 20:14:54 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> A race condition exists between the async partition scan work and device
> teardown that can lead to a use-after-free of ub->ub_disk:
>
> 1. ublk_ctrl_start_dev() schedules partition_scan_work after add_disk()
> 2. ublk_stop_dev() calls ublk_stop_dev_unlocked() which does:
> - del_gendisk(ub->ub_disk)
> - ublk_detach_disk() sets ub->ub_disk = NULL
> - put_disk() which may free the disk
> 3. The worker ublk_partition_scan_work() then dereferences ub->ub_disk
> leading to UAF
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] ublk: fix use-after-free in ublk_partition_scan_work
commit: f0d385f6689f37a2828c686fb279121df006b4cb
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ublk: fix use-after-free in ublk_partition_scan_work
2026-01-09 12:14 [PATCH] ublk: fix use-after-free in ublk_partition_scan_work Ming Lei
2026-01-09 13:57 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2026-01-09 15:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-09 15:31 ` Ming Lei
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2026-01-09 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ming Lei
Cc: Jens Axboe, linux-block, Caleb Sander Mateos, Uday Shankar,
Ruikai Peng
Why does ublk have it's own partition scan code anyway?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ublk: fix use-after-free in ublk_partition_scan_work
2026-01-09 15:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2026-01-09 15:31 ` Ming Lei
2026-01-09 15:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2026-01-09 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig
Cc: Jens Axboe, linux-block, Caleb Sander Mateos, Uday Shankar,
Ruikai Peng
On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 07:09:44AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Why does ublk have it's own partition scan code anyway?
It is for improving error handling and avoiding deadlock.
ub->mutex is held when calling add_disk(), when IO error or timeout is
triggered, error handling code path requires ub->mutex.
So it takes nvme mpath's approach to scan partition from wq context.
Thanks,
Ming
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ublk: fix use-after-free in ublk_partition_scan_work
2026-01-09 15:31 ` Ming Lei
@ 2026-01-09 15:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2026-01-09 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ming Lei
Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Jens Axboe, linux-block, Caleb Sander Mateos,
Uday Shankar, Ruikai Peng
On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 11:31:15PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 07:09:44AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Why does ublk have it's own partition scan code anyway?
>
> It is for improving error handling and avoiding deadlock.
>
> ub->mutex is held when calling add_disk(), when IO error or timeout is
> triggered, error handling code path requires ub->mutex.
>
> So it takes nvme mpath's approach to scan partition from wq context.
Ok. I have to say I hate both instance of it, we really need to find
a way to do better than that :(
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-01-09 15:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-01-09 12:14 [PATCH] ublk: fix use-after-free in ublk_partition_scan_work Ming Lei
2026-01-09 13:57 ` Jens Axboe
2026-01-09 15:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-09 15:31 ` Ming Lei
2026-01-09 15:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox