From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>,
Seamus Connor <sconnor@purestorage.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/ublk: fix garbage output and cleanup on failure
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 09:46:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aWWj8Ae8FLNLuXG4@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADUfDZpnX1yU-+7xDcEtSqTMuaR2q5zgzgMs0Bh3x8+c=1g+_w@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 09:36:39AM -0800, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2026 at 8:12 PM Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Fix several issues in kublk:
> >
> > 1. Initialize _evtfd to -1 in struct dev_ctx to prevent garbage output
> > in foreground mode. Without this, _evtfd is zero-initialized to 0
> > (stdin), and when ublk_send_dev_event() is called on failure, it
> > writes binary data to stdin which appears as garbage on the terminal.
>
> Nice, I always wondered why that happened!
>
> >
> > 2. Move fail label in ublk_start_daemon() to ensure pthread_join() is
> > called before queue deinit on the error path. This ensures proper
> > thread cleanup when startup fails.
> >
> > 3. Add async parameter to ublk_ctrl_del_dev() and use async deletion
> > when the daemon fails to start. This prevents potential hangs when
> > deleting a device that failed during startup.
> >
> > Also fix a debug message format string that was missing __func__ and
> > had wrong escape character.
>
> These all look good, but maybe they would make sense as separate commits?
Fine, I will split it into two patches:
- one is for fixing start_dev failure handling
- another one is for fixing misc debug message problems
>
> >
> > Fixes: 6aecda00b7d1 ("selftests: ublk: add kernel selftests for ublk")
> > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c | 14 +++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c
> > index 185ba553686a..0c62a967f2cb 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c
> > @@ -153,11 +153,10 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_add_dev(struct ublk_dev *dev)
> > return __ublk_ctrl_cmd(dev, &data);
> > }
> >
> > -static int ublk_ctrl_del_dev(struct ublk_dev *dev)
> > +static int ublk_ctrl_del_dev(struct ublk_dev *dev, bool async)
> > {
> > struct ublk_ctrl_cmd_data data = {
> > - .cmd_op = UBLK_U_CMD_DEL_DEV,
> > - .flags = 0,
> > + .cmd_op = async ? UBLK_U_CMD_DEL_DEV_ASYNC: UBLK_U_CMD_DEL_DEV,
> > };
> >
> > return __ublk_ctrl_cmd(dev, &data);
> > @@ -1063,11 +1062,11 @@ static int ublk_start_daemon(const struct dev_ctx *ctx, struct ublk_dev *dev)
> > else
> > ublk_send_dev_event(ctx, dev, dev->dev_info.dev_id);
> >
> > + fail:
> > /* wait until we are terminated */
> > for (i = 0; i < dev->nthreads; i++)
> > pthread_join(tinfo[i].thread, &thread_ret);
>
> Is it valid to call pthread_join() on a zeroed pthread_t value? If
> ublk_queue_init() fails, there is a goto fail before any of the
> tinfo[i].thread have been assigned. And there's no checking of the
> return value from pthread_create(), so if pthread_create() fails,
> tinfo[i].thread may not be assigned either.
Good catch, will add new fail_queue_init label for covering it.
Thanks,
Ming
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-13 1:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-12 4:12 [PATCH 0/2] ublk: fix error handling if start_dev pid validation failed Ming Lei
2026-01-12 4:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] ublk: cancel device on START_DEV failure Ming Lei
2026-01-12 16:52 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-13 1:38 ` Ming Lei
2026-01-12 4:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/ublk: fix garbage output and cleanup on failure Ming Lei
2026-01-12 17:36 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-01-13 1:46 ` Ming Lei [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aWWj8Ae8FLNLuXG4@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sconnor@purestorage.com \
--cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox