From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
colyli@fnnas.com, axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, Shida Zhang <zhangshida@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "bcache: fix improper use of bi_end_io"
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 00:58:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aWYJRsxQcLfEXJlu@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aWYDySBBmQ01JQOk@moria.home.lan>
On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 03:39:28AM -0500, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> No. The original (buggy) patch has your name on it in the suggested-by,
> you should have done your homework.
How about you stop being a dick? And if you're talking about homework
do you own and lookup that thread, and help implementing the suggestions
for fixing an API abuse, or at least reviewing them instead of angrily
shouting at someone suggesting to fix things.
> You need to reexamine your priorities here.
Maybe my priority should be to better ignore you..
Anyway, Coly: I think the issue is that bcache tries to do a silly
shortcut and reuses the bio for multiple layers of I/O which still trying
to hook into completions for both. Something like the (untested) patch
below fixes that by cloning the bio and making everything work as
expected. I'm not sure how dead lock safe even the original version is,
and my suspicion is that it needs a bio_set. Of course even suggesting
something will probably get me in trouble so take it with a grain of
salt.
---
From 1a2336f617f2e351564ec20e4db9727584e04aa9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 09:53:34 +0100
Subject: bcache: clone bio in detached_dev_do_request
Not-yet-Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
drivers/md/bcache/request.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
index 82fdea7dea7a..9e7b59121313 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
@@ -1078,67 +1078,66 @@ static CLOSURE_CALLBACK(cached_dev_nodata)
}
struct detached_dev_io_private {
- struct bcache_device *d;
unsigned long start_time;
- bio_end_io_t *bi_end_io;
- void *bi_private;
- struct block_device *orig_bdev;
+ struct bio *orig_bio;
+ struct bio bio;
};
static void detached_dev_end_io(struct bio *bio)
{
- struct detached_dev_io_private *ddip;
-
- ddip = bio->bi_private;
- bio->bi_end_io = ddip->bi_end_io;
- bio->bi_private = ddip->bi_private;
+ struct detached_dev_io_private *ddip =
+ container_of(bio, struct detached_dev_io_private, bio);
+ struct bio *orig_bio = ddip->orig_bio;
/* Count on the bcache device */
- bio_end_io_acct_remapped(bio, ddip->start_time, ddip->orig_bdev);
+ bio_end_io_acct(orig_bio, ddip->start_time);
if (bio->bi_status) {
- struct cached_dev *dc = container_of(ddip->d,
- struct cached_dev, disk);
+ struct cached_dev *dc = bio->bi_private;
+
/* should count I/O error for backing device here */
bch_count_backing_io_errors(dc, bio);
+ orig_bio->bi_status = bio->bi_status;
}
kfree(ddip);
- bio_endio(bio);
+ bio_endio(orig_bio);
}
-static void detached_dev_do_request(struct bcache_device *d, struct bio *bio,
- struct block_device *orig_bdev, unsigned long start_time)
+static void detached_dev_do_request(struct bcache_device *d,
+ struct bio *orig_bio, unsigned long start_time)
{
struct detached_dev_io_private *ddip;
struct cached_dev *dc = container_of(d, struct cached_dev, disk);
+ if (bio_op(orig_bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD &&
+ !bdev_max_discard_sectors(dc->bdev)) {
+ bio_endio(orig_bio);
+ return;
+ }
+
/*
* no need to call closure_get(&dc->disk.cl),
* because upper layer had already opened bcache device,
* which would call closure_get(&dc->disk.cl)
*/
ddip = kzalloc(sizeof(struct detached_dev_io_private), GFP_NOIO);
- if (!ddip) {
- bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
- bio_endio(bio);
- return;
- }
-
- ddip->d = d;
+ if (!ddip)
+ goto enomem;
+ if (bio_init_clone(dc->bdev, &ddip->bio, orig_bio, GFP_NOIO))
+ goto free_ddip;
/* Count on the bcache device */
- ddip->orig_bdev = orig_bdev;
ddip->start_time = start_time;
- ddip->bi_end_io = bio->bi_end_io;
- ddip->bi_private = bio->bi_private;
- bio->bi_end_io = detached_dev_end_io;
- bio->bi_private = ddip;
-
- if ((bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD) &&
- !bdev_max_discard_sectors(dc->bdev))
- detached_dev_end_io(bio);
- else
- submit_bio_noacct(bio);
+ ddip->orig_bio = orig_bio;
+ ddip->bio.bi_end_io = detached_dev_end_io;
+ ddip->bio.bi_private = dc;
+ submit_bio_noacct(&ddip->bio);
+ return;
+free_ddip:
+ kfree(ddip);
+enomem:
+ orig_bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
+ bio_endio(orig_bio);
}
static void quit_max_writeback_rate(struct cache_set *c,
@@ -1214,10 +1213,10 @@ void cached_dev_submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
start_time = bio_start_io_acct(bio);
- bio_set_dev(bio, dc->bdev);
bio->bi_iter.bi_sector += dc->sb.data_offset;
if (cached_dev_get(dc)) {
+ bio_set_dev(bio, dc->bdev);
s = search_alloc(bio, d, orig_bdev, start_time);
trace_bcache_request_start(s->d, bio);
@@ -1237,9 +1236,10 @@ void cached_dev_submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
else
cached_dev_read(dc, s);
}
- } else
+ } else {
/* I/O request sent to backing device */
- detached_dev_do_request(d, bio, orig_bdev, start_time);
+ detached_dev_do_request(d, bio, start_time);
+ }
}
static int cached_dev_ioctl(struct bcache_device *d, blk_mode_t mode,
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-13 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-13 6:09 [PATCH] Revert "bcache: fix improper use of bi_end_io" colyli
2026-01-13 8:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 8:30 ` Kent Overstreet
2026-01-13 8:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 8:39 ` Kent Overstreet
2026-01-13 8:58 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-01-13 9:27 ` Kent Overstreet
2026-01-13 15:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 15:30 ` Kent Overstreet
2026-01-13 16:18 ` Coly Li
2026-01-13 16:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 16:34 ` Kent Overstreet
2026-01-19 9:51 ` Daniel Wagner
2026-01-19 10:18 ` Kent Overstreet
2026-01-19 10:34 ` Daniel Wagner
2026-01-19 15:57 ` Daniel Wagner
2026-01-13 16:22 ` Coly Li
2026-01-13 16:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aWYJRsxQcLfEXJlu@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=colyli@fnnas.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zhangshida@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox