From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6CF02E2665; Tue, 13 Jan 2026 15:00:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768316410; cv=none; b=qZhSuU7DJFwj4CYKBskFpqS2uxb4WQRpNpXnkw88jZPulWtXfjr3ErkdYCeXjvK05PqgwsAaK0LPul6gIQTlrcNB2v5q3NIvd8NVHLT6BC7zcf5nM8X1TGQdXfkNuw7A0knJZVMMBBx2Np5s0WycrZ3oL1oeLkWkCF4sSo58DSM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768316410; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WZjYyxEXNfb0G6BP32MqdY+H0KBZSMku95YWUo+ebyI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=nn6HNqBCTAaV3ghZxMU1KKB8XG2CDYRfhd+bQmN2It//g5j8/pWL+zG13Ln656kL/CYM+W52s3q5Z0F+z0Ml6BEgQW2lxdGsMY/v6KKErqhMYO76UZShuaJ82iWaSRtkkvIdWEHl0PsTw5l23ZR1iBRmtK34VuAJJYI1zBnd+2g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=dK6Q0Umj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="dK6Q0Umj" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=+fuxlbJlUYfXOxWEs5TdvrBNHebtJpsq9L9QFtFHmYA=; b=dK6Q0UmjovhgfIXbwPb36+2+do med8zrKmxrIb/keFIzltbEhogntaItG9wDiVR/6/v/xbgPw+NDOl6q4NskeHMtm8oS3u4c0F5NWSH +xkPi6BKkqVNtdq4QV4IoC+Llw0A8iJDn3DMIhSOPrIGqfA2c4jcdMfvPqxRkG0dbkTNKywaxE9dr Kjyp5s3UdDEShGMIrhiT6xkT2zyQUb/707IDJUryo2miAkGJcHg6lhwN8Fiut8eE5m9M8IxbEqao3 jgjsOVTPjpwo9Bdwuq0f+jQAW2gk3ISaNEpRNq6CDPL/FbuzgaOhqx4TotSp8Y2CoSg+NQPROOYvJ PlwE6lDA==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vffsJ-00000007JE2-23X2; Tue, 13 Jan 2026 15:00:03 +0000 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 07:00:03 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Kent Overstreet Cc: Christoph Hellwig , colyli@fnnas.com, axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, Shida Zhang Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "bcache: fix improper use of bi_end_io" Message-ID: References: <20260113060940.46489-1-colyli@fnnas.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 04:27:19AM -0500, Kent Overstreet wrote: > It's not being a dick to tell someone they need to slow down and be more > careful when they're doing something broken and arguing over the revert. Yes, you are. I did not actually do anything here but point out that bcache is broken. If that fix made things worse it would be useful if one of the maintainers or a CI system spots it. You need to do your job as maintainer instead of constantly attacking others. Start with that, and then just try being a little nice to people. Most folks will respond nicely to questions, but less so when you start out with an attack. And until you learn that I have absolutely no interest in wasting any further time on arguing with you in any form.