public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Coly Li" <colyli@fnnas.com>
To: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: "Kent Overstreet" <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>, <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	 <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org>,
	 "Shida Zhang" <zhangshida@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "bcache: fix improper use of bi_end_io"
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 00:18:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aWZwBZaVVBC0otPd@studio.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aWYJRsxQcLfEXJlu@infradead.org>

On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 12:58:46AM +0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Anyway, Coly: I think the issue is that bcache tries to do a silly
> shortcut and reuses the bio for multiple layers of I/O which still trying
> to hook into completions for both.  Something like the (untested) patch
> below fixes that by cloning the bio and making everything work as
> expected.  I'm not sure how dead lock safe even the original version is,
> and my suspicion is that it needs a bio_set.  Of course even suggesting
> something will probably get me in trouble so take it with a grain of
> salt.
> 
> ---
> From 1a2336f617f2e351564ec20e4db9727584e04aa9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 09:53:34 +0100
> Subject: bcache: clone bio in detached_dev_do_request
> 
> Not-yet-Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Hi Christoph,

This cloned bio method looks good. Could you please post a formal patch?
Then I may replace the revert commit with your patch.

Thanks.

Coly Li

> ---
>  drivers/md/bcache/request.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> index 82fdea7dea7a..9e7b59121313 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> @@ -1078,67 +1078,66 @@ static CLOSURE_CALLBACK(cached_dev_nodata)
>  }
>  
>  struct detached_dev_io_private {
> -	struct bcache_device	*d;
>  	unsigned long		start_time;
> -	bio_end_io_t		*bi_end_io;
> -	void			*bi_private;
> -	struct block_device	*orig_bdev;
> +	struct bio		*orig_bio;
> +	struct bio		bio;
>  };
>  
>  static void detached_dev_end_io(struct bio *bio)
>  {
> -	struct detached_dev_io_private *ddip;
> -
> -	ddip = bio->bi_private;
> -	bio->bi_end_io = ddip->bi_end_io;
> -	bio->bi_private = ddip->bi_private;
> +	struct detached_dev_io_private *ddip =
> +		container_of(bio, struct detached_dev_io_private, bio);
> +	struct bio *orig_bio = ddip->orig_bio;
>  
>  	/* Count on the bcache device */
> -	bio_end_io_acct_remapped(bio, ddip->start_time, ddip->orig_bdev);
> +	bio_end_io_acct(orig_bio, ddip->start_time);
>  
>  	if (bio->bi_status) {
> -		struct cached_dev *dc = container_of(ddip->d,
> -						     struct cached_dev, disk);
> +		struct cached_dev *dc = bio->bi_private;
> +
>  		/* should count I/O error for backing device here */
>  		bch_count_backing_io_errors(dc, bio);
> +		orig_bio->bi_status = bio->bi_status;
>  	}
>  
>  	kfree(ddip);
> -	bio_endio(bio);
> +	bio_endio(orig_bio);
>  }
>  
> -static void detached_dev_do_request(struct bcache_device *d, struct bio *bio,
> -		struct block_device *orig_bdev, unsigned long start_time)
> +static void detached_dev_do_request(struct bcache_device *d,
> +		struct bio *orig_bio, unsigned long start_time)
>  {
>  	struct detached_dev_io_private *ddip;
>  	struct cached_dev *dc = container_of(d, struct cached_dev, disk);
>  
> +	if (bio_op(orig_bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD &&
> +	    !bdev_max_discard_sectors(dc->bdev)) {
> +		bio_endio(orig_bio);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * no need to call closure_get(&dc->disk.cl),
>  	 * because upper layer had already opened bcache device,
>  	 * which would call closure_get(&dc->disk.cl)
>  	 */
>  	ddip = kzalloc(sizeof(struct detached_dev_io_private), GFP_NOIO);
> -	if (!ddip) {
> -		bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
> -		bio_endio(bio);
> -		return;
> -	}
> -
> -	ddip->d = d;
> +	if (!ddip)
> +		goto enomem;
> +	if (bio_init_clone(dc->bdev, &ddip->bio, orig_bio, GFP_NOIO))
> +		goto free_ddip;
>  	/* Count on the bcache device */
> -	ddip->orig_bdev = orig_bdev;
>  	ddip->start_time = start_time;
> -	ddip->bi_end_io = bio->bi_end_io;
> -	ddip->bi_private = bio->bi_private;
> -	bio->bi_end_io = detached_dev_end_io;
> -	bio->bi_private = ddip;
> -
> -	if ((bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD) &&
> -	    !bdev_max_discard_sectors(dc->bdev))
> -		detached_dev_end_io(bio);
> -	else
> -		submit_bio_noacct(bio);
> +	ddip->orig_bio = orig_bio;
> +	ddip->bio.bi_end_io = detached_dev_end_io;
> +	ddip->bio.bi_private = dc;
> +	submit_bio_noacct(&ddip->bio);
> +	return;
> +free_ddip:
> +	kfree(ddip);
> +enomem:
> +	orig_bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
> +	bio_endio(orig_bio);
>  }
>  
>  static void quit_max_writeback_rate(struct cache_set *c,
> @@ -1214,10 +1213,10 @@ void cached_dev_submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
>  
>  	start_time = bio_start_io_acct(bio);
>  
> -	bio_set_dev(bio, dc->bdev);
>  	bio->bi_iter.bi_sector += dc->sb.data_offset;
>  
>  	if (cached_dev_get(dc)) {
> +		bio_set_dev(bio, dc->bdev);
>  		s = search_alloc(bio, d, orig_bdev, start_time);
>  		trace_bcache_request_start(s->d, bio);
>  
> @@ -1237,9 +1236,10 @@ void cached_dev_submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
>  			else
>  				cached_dev_read(dc, s);
>  		}
> -	} else
> +	} else {
>  		/* I/O request sent to backing device */
> -		detached_dev_do_request(d, bio, orig_bdev, start_time);
> +		detached_dev_do_request(d, bio, start_time);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static int cached_dev_ioctl(struct bcache_device *d, blk_mode_t mode,
> -- 
> 2.47.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-13 16:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-13  6:09 [PATCH] Revert "bcache: fix improper use of bi_end_io" colyli
2026-01-13  8:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13  8:30   ` Kent Overstreet
2026-01-13  8:34     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13  8:39       ` Kent Overstreet
2026-01-13  8:58         ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13  9:27           ` Kent Overstreet
2026-01-13 15:00             ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 15:30               ` Kent Overstreet
2026-01-13 16:18           ` Coly Li [this message]
2026-01-13 16:26             ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 16:34               ` Kent Overstreet
2026-01-19  9:51                 ` Daniel Wagner
2026-01-19 10:18                   ` Kent Overstreet
2026-01-19 10:34                     ` Daniel Wagner
2026-01-19 15:57                       ` Daniel Wagner
2026-01-13 16:22   ` Coly Li
2026-01-13 16:25     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aWZwBZaVVBC0otPd@studio.local \
    --to=colyli@fnnas.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zhangshida@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox