From: "Coly Li" <colyli@fnnas.com>
To: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: "Kent Overstreet" <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>, <axboe@kernel.dk>,
<linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org>,
"Shida Zhang" <zhangshida@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "bcache: fix improper use of bi_end_io"
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 00:18:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aWZwBZaVVBC0otPd@studio.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aWYJRsxQcLfEXJlu@infradead.org>
On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 12:58:46AM +0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Anyway, Coly: I think the issue is that bcache tries to do a silly
> shortcut and reuses the bio for multiple layers of I/O which still trying
> to hook into completions for both. Something like the (untested) patch
> below fixes that by cloning the bio and making everything work as
> expected. I'm not sure how dead lock safe even the original version is,
> and my suspicion is that it needs a bio_set. Of course even suggesting
> something will probably get me in trouble so take it with a grain of
> salt.
>
> ---
> From 1a2336f617f2e351564ec20e4db9727584e04aa9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 09:53:34 +0100
> Subject: bcache: clone bio in detached_dev_do_request
>
> Not-yet-Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Hi Christoph,
This cloned bio method looks good. Could you please post a formal patch?
Then I may replace the revert commit with your patch.
Thanks.
Coly Li
> ---
> drivers/md/bcache/request.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> index 82fdea7dea7a..9e7b59121313 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> @@ -1078,67 +1078,66 @@ static CLOSURE_CALLBACK(cached_dev_nodata)
> }
>
> struct detached_dev_io_private {
> - struct bcache_device *d;
> unsigned long start_time;
> - bio_end_io_t *bi_end_io;
> - void *bi_private;
> - struct block_device *orig_bdev;
> + struct bio *orig_bio;
> + struct bio bio;
> };
>
> static void detached_dev_end_io(struct bio *bio)
> {
> - struct detached_dev_io_private *ddip;
> -
> - ddip = bio->bi_private;
> - bio->bi_end_io = ddip->bi_end_io;
> - bio->bi_private = ddip->bi_private;
> + struct detached_dev_io_private *ddip =
> + container_of(bio, struct detached_dev_io_private, bio);
> + struct bio *orig_bio = ddip->orig_bio;
>
> /* Count on the bcache device */
> - bio_end_io_acct_remapped(bio, ddip->start_time, ddip->orig_bdev);
> + bio_end_io_acct(orig_bio, ddip->start_time);
>
> if (bio->bi_status) {
> - struct cached_dev *dc = container_of(ddip->d,
> - struct cached_dev, disk);
> + struct cached_dev *dc = bio->bi_private;
> +
> /* should count I/O error for backing device here */
> bch_count_backing_io_errors(dc, bio);
> + orig_bio->bi_status = bio->bi_status;
> }
>
> kfree(ddip);
> - bio_endio(bio);
> + bio_endio(orig_bio);
> }
>
> -static void detached_dev_do_request(struct bcache_device *d, struct bio *bio,
> - struct block_device *orig_bdev, unsigned long start_time)
> +static void detached_dev_do_request(struct bcache_device *d,
> + struct bio *orig_bio, unsigned long start_time)
> {
> struct detached_dev_io_private *ddip;
> struct cached_dev *dc = container_of(d, struct cached_dev, disk);
>
> + if (bio_op(orig_bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD &&
> + !bdev_max_discard_sectors(dc->bdev)) {
> + bio_endio(orig_bio);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * no need to call closure_get(&dc->disk.cl),
> * because upper layer had already opened bcache device,
> * which would call closure_get(&dc->disk.cl)
> */
> ddip = kzalloc(sizeof(struct detached_dev_io_private), GFP_NOIO);
> - if (!ddip) {
> - bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
> - bio_endio(bio);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - ddip->d = d;
> + if (!ddip)
> + goto enomem;
> + if (bio_init_clone(dc->bdev, &ddip->bio, orig_bio, GFP_NOIO))
> + goto free_ddip;
> /* Count on the bcache device */
> - ddip->orig_bdev = orig_bdev;
> ddip->start_time = start_time;
> - ddip->bi_end_io = bio->bi_end_io;
> - ddip->bi_private = bio->bi_private;
> - bio->bi_end_io = detached_dev_end_io;
> - bio->bi_private = ddip;
> -
> - if ((bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD) &&
> - !bdev_max_discard_sectors(dc->bdev))
> - detached_dev_end_io(bio);
> - else
> - submit_bio_noacct(bio);
> + ddip->orig_bio = orig_bio;
> + ddip->bio.bi_end_io = detached_dev_end_io;
> + ddip->bio.bi_private = dc;
> + submit_bio_noacct(&ddip->bio);
> + return;
> +free_ddip:
> + kfree(ddip);
> +enomem:
> + orig_bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
> + bio_endio(orig_bio);
> }
>
> static void quit_max_writeback_rate(struct cache_set *c,
> @@ -1214,10 +1213,10 @@ void cached_dev_submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
>
> start_time = bio_start_io_acct(bio);
>
> - bio_set_dev(bio, dc->bdev);
> bio->bi_iter.bi_sector += dc->sb.data_offset;
>
> if (cached_dev_get(dc)) {
> + bio_set_dev(bio, dc->bdev);
> s = search_alloc(bio, d, orig_bdev, start_time);
> trace_bcache_request_start(s->d, bio);
>
> @@ -1237,9 +1236,10 @@ void cached_dev_submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
> else
> cached_dev_read(dc, s);
> }
> - } else
> + } else {
> /* I/O request sent to backing device */
> - detached_dev_do_request(d, bio, orig_bdev, start_time);
> + detached_dev_do_request(d, bio, start_time);
> + }
> }
>
> static int cached_dev_ioctl(struct bcache_device *d, blk_mode_t mode,
> --
> 2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-13 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-13 6:09 [PATCH] Revert "bcache: fix improper use of bi_end_io" colyli
2026-01-13 8:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 8:30 ` Kent Overstreet
2026-01-13 8:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 8:39 ` Kent Overstreet
2026-01-13 8:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 9:27 ` Kent Overstreet
2026-01-13 15:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 15:30 ` Kent Overstreet
2026-01-13 16:18 ` Coly Li [this message]
2026-01-13 16:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 16:34 ` Kent Overstreet
2026-01-19 9:51 ` Daniel Wagner
2026-01-19 10:18 ` Kent Overstreet
2026-01-19 10:34 ` Daniel Wagner
2026-01-19 15:57 ` Daniel Wagner
2026-01-13 16:22 ` Coly Li
2026-01-13 16:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aWZwBZaVVBC0otPd@studio.local \
--to=colyli@fnnas.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zhangshida@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox