From: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
To: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
Cc: "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
Stephen Zhang <starzhangzsd@gmail.com>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
Coly Li <colyli@fnnas.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org" <linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests v2 1/2] bcache: add bcache/001
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 08:05:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXHWBswguTmf8VCx@shinmob> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260121-bcache-v2-1-b26af185e63a@suse.de>
Hi Daniel, thank you for working on this. It's great to extend the test
coverage :)
Please find my review comments in line. I ran the new test case, and observed a
failure. I noted my findings about the failure as one of the inline comments.
On Jan 21, 2026 / 15:36, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> So far we are missing tests for bcache. Besides a relative simple
> setup/teardown tests add also the corresponding infrastructure. More
> tests are to be expected to depend on this.
>
> _create_bcache/_remove_bcache are tracking the resources and if anything
> is missing it will complain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
> ---
> tests/bcache/001 | 32 +++++++
> tests/bcache/001.out | 1 +
> tests/bcache/rc | 259 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 292 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/bcache/001 b/tests/bcache/001
> new file mode 100644
To be consistent with other test case files, I suggest to set the file mode 755.
> index 000000000000..4a6e01113b6b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/bcache/001
> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> +#!/bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
Most of blktests files specifies GPL-3.0+. If there is no specific reason,
I suggest GPL-3.0+. Same comment for tests/bcache/rc.
> +# Copyright (C) 2026 Daniel Wagner, SUSE Labs
> +#
> +# Test bcache setup and teardown
> +
> +. tests/bcache/rc
> +
> +DESCRIPTION="test bcache setup and teardown"
> +
> +requires() {
> + _bcache_requires
> +}
Do you foresee that all bcache/* test cases have this _bcache_requires call?
If so, I suggest to,
- rename _bcache_requires() in tests/bcache/rc to group_requires(), and
- drop the three lines above from bcache/001.
group_requires() is called once before start testing this bcache group.
> +
> +test_device_array() {
> + echo "Running ${TEST_NAME}"
> +
> + if [[ ${#TEST_DEV_ARRAY[@]} -lt 3 ]]; then
> + SKIP_REASONS+=("requires at least 3 devices")
> + return 1
> + fi
> +
> + _create_bcache \
> + --cache "${TEST_DEV_ARRAY[0]##*/}" \
> + --bdev "${TEST_DEV_ARRAY[1]##*/}"
> + _remove_bcache
> +
> + _create_bcache \
> + --cache "${TEST_DEV_ARRAY[0]##*/}" \
> + --bdev "${TEST_DEV_ARRAY[1]##*/}" "${TEST_DEV_ARRAY[2]##*/}"
> + _remove_bcache
> +}
> diff --git a/tests/bcache/001.out b/tests/bcache/001.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..f890aed2736c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/bcache/001.out
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +Running bcache/001
> diff --git a/tests/bcache/rc b/tests/bcache/rc
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3dba6c85b1ee
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/bcache/rc
> @@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
> +#!/bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (C) 2026 Daniel Wagner, SUSE Labs
> +
> +. common/rc
> +
> +declare -a BCACHE_DEVS=()
> +declare -a BCACHE_BDEVS=()
> +declare -a BCACHE_CSETS=()
> +
> +BCACHE_MAX_RETRIES=5
> +
> +_bcache_requires() {
> + _have_kernel_options MD BCACHE BCACHE_DEBUG AUTOFS_FS
> + _have_program make-bcache
> + _have_crypto_algorithm crc32c
> +}
As noted above, you may want to rename _bcache_requires() to group_requires().
> +
> +_bcache_wipe_devs() {
Nit: "local dev" can be added here.
> + for dev in "${BCACHE_DEVS[@]}"; do
> + # Attempt a clean wipe first
> + if wipefs --all --quiet "${dev}" 2>/dev/null; then
> + continue
> + fi
> +
> + # Overwrite the first 10MB to clear stubborn partition tables or metadata
> + if ! dd if=/dev/zero of="${dev}" bs=1M count=10 conv=notrunc status=none; then
> + echo "Error: dd failed on ${dev}" >&2
> + fi
> +
> + # Try wiping again after clearing the headers
> + if ! wipefs --all --quiet --force "${dev}"; then
> + echo "Warning: Failed to wipe ${dev} even after dd." >&2
> + fi
> + done
> +}
> +
> +_bcache_register() {
When I did trial run, the test case bcache/001 failed with the message below.
bcache/001 => nvme1n1 nvme2n1 nvme3n1 nvme4n1 (test bcache setup and teardown) [failed]
runtime 8.406s ... 12.789s
--- tests/bcache/001.out 2026-01-22 13:55:00.510094421 +0900
+++ /home/shin/Blktests/blktests/results/nvme1n1_nvme2n1_nvme3n1_nvme4n1/bcache/001.out.bad 2026-01-22 16:21:47.686976578 +0900
@@ -1 +1,3 @@
Running bcache/001
+ERROR: bcache registration interface not found.
+WARNING: Could not find device node for UUID b854b766-8e08-42b5-b7cc-e137fd78ca51 after 5s
I found that when the bcache driver is loadable and not yet loaded, the
make-bcache command call loads the driver. However, it takes time for
kernel to prepare /sys/fs/bcache/register. Hence the error message above.
I suggest to add a hunk below here, to wait for the register file get ready.
With this change, the failure disappeared in my test environment.
local dev err_msg timeout=0
while [[ ! -w /sys/fs/bcache/register ]] && (( timeout < 10 )); do
sleep 1
(( timeout ++ ))
done
> + if [[ ! -w /sys/fs/bcache/register ]]; then
> + echo "ERROR: bcache registration interface not found." >&2
> + return 1
> + fi
> +
> + for dev in "${BCACHE_DEVS[@]}"; do
> + if ! echo "${dev}" > /sys/fs/bcache/register 2>/tmp/bcache_err; then
> + err_msg=$(< /tmp/bcache_err)
> +
> + if [[ "${err_msg}" != *"Device or resource busy"* ]]; then
> + echo "ERROR: Failed to register ${dev}: ${err_msg:-"Unknown error"}" >&2
> + fi
> + fi
> + done
> +}
> +
> +_create_bcache() {
> + local -a cdevs=()
> + local -a bdevs=()
> + local -a ARGS=()
> + local bucket_size="64k"
> + local block_size="4k"
> +
> + _register_test_cleanup _cleanup_bcache
> +
> + while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do
> + case $1 in
> + --cache)
> + shift
> + # Collect arguments until the next flag or end of input
> + while [[ $# -gt 0 && ! $1 =~ ^-- ]]; do
> + cdevs+=("$1")
> + shift
> + done
> + ;;
> + --bdev)
> + shift
> + # Collect arguments until the next flag or end of input
> + while [[ $# -gt 0 && ! $1 =~ ^-- ]]; do
> + bdevs+=("$1")
> + shift
> + done
> + ;;
> + --bucket-size)
> + bucket_size="$2"
> + shift 2
> + ;;
> + --block-size)
> + block_size="$2"
> + shift 2
> + ;;
> + --writeback)
> + ARGS+=(--writeback)
> + shift 1
> + ;;
> + --discard)
> + ARGS+=(--discard)
> + shift 1
> + ;;
> + *)
> + echo "WARNING: unknown argument: $1"
> + shift
> + ;;
> + esac
> + done
> +
> + # add /dev prefix to device names
> + cdevs=( "${cdevs[@]/#/\/dev\/}" )
> + bdevs=( "${bdevs[@]/#/\/dev\/}" )
> +
> + # make-bcache expects empty/cleared devices
> + BCACHE_DEVS+=("${cdevs[@]}" "${bdevs[@]}")
> + _bcache_wipe_devs
> +
> + local -a cdevs_args=()
Nit: "local dev" can be added here.
> + for dev in "${cdevs[@]}"; do
> + cdevs_args+=("--cache" "${dev}")
> + done
> +
> + local -a bdevs_args=()
> + for dev in "${bdevs[@]}"; do
> + bdevs_args+=("--bdev" "${dev}")
> + done
> +
> + local output cmd
"cmd" is array, then, I guess you meant,
local -a cmd
local output
> + cmd=(make-bcache \
> + --wipe-bcache \
> + --bucket "${bucket_size}" \
> + --block "${block_size}" \
> + "${cdevs_args[@]}" \
> + "${bdevs_args[@]}" \
> + "${ARGS[@]}")
> +
> + output=$("${cmd[@]}" 2>&1)
> + local rc=$?
> + if [[ "${rc}" -ne 0 ]]; then
> + echo "ERROR: make-bcache failed:" >&2
> + echo "$output" >&2
> + return 1
> + fi
> +
> + local cset_uuid
> + cset_uuid=$(echo "$output" | awk '/Set UUID:/ {print $3}' | head -n 1)
> + if [[ -z "${cset_uuid}" ]]; then
> + echo "ERROR: Could not extract cset UUID from make-bcache output" >&2
> + return 1
> + fi
> + BCACHE_CSETS+=("${cset_uuid}")
> +
> + local -a bdev_uuids
> + mapfile -t bdev_uuids < <(echo "$output" | awk '
> + $1 == "UUID:" { last_uuid = $2 }
> + $1 == "version:" && $2 == "1" { print last_uuid}
> + ')
> +
> + udevadm settle
> +
> + _bcache_register
> +
> + for uuid in "${bdev_uuids[@]}"; do
> + local link found attempt
> +
> + link=/dev/bcache/by-uuid/"${uuid}"
> + found=false
> + attempt=0
> +
> + while (( attempt < BCACHE_MAX_RETRIES )); do
> + if [[ -L "$link" ]]; then
> + BCACHE_BDEVS+=("${uuid}")
> + found=true
> + break
> + fi
> +
> + (( attempt++ ))
> + sleep 1
> + done
> +
> + if [[ "$found" == "false" ]]; then
> + echo "WARNING: Could not find device node for UUID ${uuid} after ${BCACHE_MAX_RETRIES}s" >&2
Two spaces are used for the indent above.
> + fi
> + done
> +}
> +
> +_remove_bcache() {
> + local uuid
> +
> + for uuid in "${BCACHE_BDEVS[@]}"; do
> + local dev_path
> +
> + dev_path=$(blkid -U "${uuid}")
> + if [ -n "$dev_path" ]; then
> + local dev_name
> +
> + dev_name="${dev_path##*/}"
> + if [ -f "/sys/block/${dev_name}/bcache/stop" ] ; then
> + echo 1 > "/sys/block/${dev_name}/bcache/stop"
Same here.
> + fi
> + fi
> + done
> +
> + for uuid in "${BCACHE_CSETS[@]}"; do
> + if [ -f /sys/fs/bcache/"${uuid}"/unregister ] ; then
> + echo 1 > /sys/fs/bcache/"${uuid}"/unregister
Same here.
> + fi
> + done
> +
> + udevadm settle
> +
> + local timeout
> + timeout=0
> + for uuid in "${BCACHE_CSETS[@]}"; do
> + while [[ -d "/sys/fs/bcache/${uuid}" ]] && (( timeout < 10 )); do
> + sleep 0.5
> + (( timeout++ ))
> + done
> + done
> +
> + _bcache_wipe_devs
> +
> + BCACHE_CSETS=()
> + BCACHE_BDEVS=()
> +}
> +
> +_cleanup_bcache() {
> + local cset dev
> +
> + shopt -s nullglob
> + for dev in /sys/block/bcache* ; do
> + [ -e "${dev}" ] || continue
> +
> + dev=$(basename "${dev}")
> + echo "WARNING: bcache device ${dev} found"
> +
> + if [[ -f /sys/block/"${dev}"/bcache/stop ]]; then
> + echo 1 > /sys/block/"${dev}"/bcache/stop 2>/dev/null || true
Do we need "|| true" here?
> + fi
> + done
> +
> + for cset in /sys/fs/bcache/*-*-*-*-*; do
> + if [[ -d "${cset}" ]]; then
> + echo "WARNING: Unregistering cset $(basename "${cset}")"
> + echo 1 > "${cset}"/unregister 2>/dev/null || true
Same here.
> + fi
> + done
> + shopt -u nullglob
> +
> + udevadm settle
> +
> + local timeout
> + timeout=0
> + for cset in /sys/fs/bcache/*-*-*-*-*; do
> + while [[ -d "${cset}" ]] && (( timeout < 10 )); do
> + sleep 0.5
> + (( timeout++ ))
> + done
> + done
> +
> + _bcache_wipe_devs
> +
> + BCACHE_DEVS=()
> +}
>
> --
> 2.52.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-22 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-21 14:36 [PATCH blktests v2 0/2] bcache: add bcache/001 Daniel Wagner
2026-01-21 14:36 ` [PATCH blktests v2 1/2] " Daniel Wagner
2026-01-21 16:08 ` Daniel Wagner
2026-01-22 8:05 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki [this message]
2026-01-22 10:28 ` Daniel Wagner
2026-01-21 14:36 ` [PATCH blktests v2 2/2] doc: document how to configure bcache tests Daniel Wagner
2026-01-22 8:08 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aXHWBswguTmf8VCx@shinmob \
--to=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
--cc=Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=colyli@fnnas.com \
--cc=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=starzhangzsd@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox