From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Alexander Atanasov <alex@zazolabs.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ublk: cleanup flag handling and fix UBLK_F_NO_AUTO_PART_SCAN
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 19:04:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZ2F24VQcnFOySji@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <182C75BB-3CBC-4627-9F15-AE8FE675260C@zazolabs.com>
On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 12:54:49PM +0200, Alexander Atanasov wrote:
>
>
> > On 24 Feb 2026, at 11:34, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 12:15:11PM +0000, Alexander Atanasov wrote:
> >> Currently the code misuse GD_SUPPRESS_PART_SCAN flag
> >> as it tries to use it as a switch for the auto partition scan.
> >> To fully disable creation of partitions GENHD_FL_NO_PART must
> >> be used, switch code to use it instead GD_SUPPRESS_PART_SCAN.
> >>
> >> Using the new flags rules for partitions become:
> >> - Unprivileged daemons - never scan partitions, they have
> >> GENHD_FL_NO_PART always set - they are devices without partitions.
> >>
> >> - Trusted daemons - by default have partitions disabled.
> >> Partitions can be enabled via UBLK_F_PARTITIONS flag and
> >> automatic initial scan can be requested via UBLK_F_AUTO_PART_SCAN flag.
> >>
> >> Rework the code to work as described above:
> >> - remove checks in ublk_partition_scan_work and rely on
> >> the caller to schedule the work only if it has to be done.
> >> - set GENHD_FL_NO_PART on unprivileged devices
> >> - set GENHD_FL_NO_PART depending on UBLK_F_PARTITIONS on trusted
> >> devices.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 8443e2087e70 ("ublk: add UBLK_F_NO_AUTO_PART_SCAN feature flag")
> >> Signed-off-by: Alexander Atanasov <alex@zazolabs.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
> >> include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h | 7 +++++--
> >> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> >> index 3c918db4905c..d0c646eb9435 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> >> @@ -81,7 +81,8 @@
> >> | (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY) ? UBLK_F_INTEGRITY : 0) \
> >> | UBLK_F_SAFE_STOP_DEV \
> >> | UBLK_F_BATCH_IO \
> >> - | UBLK_F_NO_AUTO_PART_SCAN)
> >> + | UBLK_F_PARTITIONS \
> >> + | UBLK_F_AUTO_PART_SCAN)
> >>
> >> #define UBLK_F_ALL_RECOVERY_FLAGS (UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY \
> >> | UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY_REISSUE \
> >> @@ -2361,14 +2362,9 @@ static void ublk_partition_scan_work(struct work_struct *work)
> >> if (!disk)
> >> return;
> >>
> >> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!test_and_clear_bit(GD_SUPPRESS_PART_SCAN,
> >> - &disk->state)))
> >> - goto out;
> >> -
> >> mutex_lock(&disk->open_mutex);
> >> bdev_disk_changed(disk, false);
> >> mutex_unlock(&disk->open_mutex);
> >> -out:
> >> ublk_put_disk(disk);
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -4409,9 +4405,13 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_start_dev(struct ublk_device *ub,
> >> * wait while holding ub->mutex, which can deadlock with other
> >> * operations that need the mutex. Defer partition scan to async
> >> * work.
> >> - * For unprivileged daemons, keep GD_SUPPRESS_PART_SCAN set
> >> - * permanently.
> >> + * For unprivileged daemons, set GENHD_FL_NO_PART to
> >> + * disable partitions.
> >> */
> >> + if (ub->unprivileged_daemons)
> >> + disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART;
> >
> > The above code block can cover UBLK_F_PARTITIONS too.
>
> Yes, as Hannes noted. I will merge flag update fragments in one place where possible.
> Only clear_bit(GD_SUPPRESS_PART_SCAN, &disk->state); needs to be after add_disk(disk);
> which will trigger partition scan that we want to do manually when ready.
>
>
> >> +
> >> + /* Disable partition scans */
> >> set_bit(GD_SUPPRESS_PART_SCAN, &disk->state);
> >>
> >> ublk_get_device(ub);
> >> @@ -4429,13 +4429,17 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_start_dev(struct ublk_device *ub,
> >>
> >> set_bit(UB_STATE_USED, &ub->state);
> >>
> >> - /* Skip partition scan if disabled by user */
> >> - if (ub->dev_info.flags & UBLK_F_NO_AUTO_PART_SCAN) {
> >> - clear_bit(GD_SUPPRESS_PART_SCAN, &disk->state);
> >> - } else {
> >> - /* Schedule async partition scan for trusted daemons */
> >> - if (!ub->unprivileged_daemons)
> >> - schedule_work(&ub->partition_scan_work);
> >> + if (!ub->unprivileged_daemons) {
> >> + if (!(ub->dev_info.flags & UBLK_F_PARTITIONS)) {
> >> + /* disable partitions on trusted device */
> >> + disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART;
> >> + } else {
> >> + /* Enable partition scan on device */
> >> + clear_bit(GD_SUPPRESS_PART_SCAN, &disk->state);
> >> + /* Schedule auto partition scan if requested */
> >> + if (ub->dev_info.flags & UBLK_F_AUTO_PART_SCAN)
> >> + schedule_work(&ub->partition_scan_work);
> >> + }
> >> }
> >>
> >> out_put_cdev:
> >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h b/include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h
> >> index a88876756805..467ecaa20ac1 100644
> >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h
> >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h
> >> @@ -367,8 +367,11 @@
> >> */
> >> #define UBLK_F_SAFE_STOP_DEV (1ULL << 17)
> >>
> >> -/* Disable automatic partition scanning when device is started */
> >> -#define UBLK_F_NO_AUTO_PART_SCAN (1ULL << 18)
> >> +/* Enable partitions on the device */
> >> +#define UBLK_F_PARTITIONS (1ULL << 18)
> >> +
> >> +/* Perform automatic partition scanning when device is started */
> >> +#define UBLK_F_AUTO_PART_SCAN (1ULL << 19)
> >
> > I think it isn't necessary to add UBLK_F_AUTO_PART_SCAN, and the default
> > behavior is to scan partitions automatically just like other block device.
>
>
> If we want by default to scan there should be UBLK_F_NO_AUTO_PART_SCAN to disable
> scanning when desired - are you ok with it?
I am fine with either way:
- keep UBLK_F_NO_AUTO_PART_SCAN as it is, which just disallow partition
scan during add disk; meantime add UBLK_F_NO_PART_SCAN, which disables part
scan permanently
- remove UBLK_F_NO_AUTO_PART_SCAN, as no one requires it, meantime add
UBLK_F_NO_PART_SCAN, which disables part scan permanently
But looks Hannes prefers to the latter, which is cleaner from UAPI
viewpoint.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-24 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-23 12:15 [PATCH 0/4] ublk: rework partition handling Alexander Atanasov
2026-02-23 12:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] ublk: cleanup flag handling and fix UBLK_F_NO_AUTO_PART_SCAN Alexander Atanasov
2026-02-23 12:29 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-02-23 15:59 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-02-23 16:23 ` Alexander Atanasov
2026-02-23 16:42 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-02-23 17:19 ` Alexander Atanasov
2026-02-24 9:31 ` Ming Lei
2026-02-24 9:34 ` Ming Lei
[not found] ` <182C75BB-3CBC-4627-9F15-AE8FE675260C@zazolabs.com>
2026-02-24 11:04 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2026-02-23 12:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] selftests: ublk: rework partitions tests for new flags Alexander Atanasov
2026-02-23 12:29 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-02-23 12:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] ublk: document partition flags, kublk and update external links Alexander Atanasov
2026-02-23 12:30 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-02-23 12:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] selftests: ublk: cleanup kublk.h Alexander Atanasov
2026-02-23 12:30 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aZ2F24VQcnFOySji@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=alex@zazolabs.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox